Sittings
Search every subject Parliament voted on since the term began in July 2024 — by topic, document number, rapporteur or procedure — or browse the sittings below.
All 124 sittings of this term are searchable. Index refreshed 10 h ago. Clear search
114 subjects match · 60 adopted, 54 rejected
Wednesday, 21 October 2026 1 match
-
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified soybean MON 87769Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament voted on a motion for a resolution on a draft Commission decision to renew the authorisation for placing on the market products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87769. Parliament adopted the resolution, meaning it states its position that the draft decision exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and is not consistent with Union law. Parliament calls on the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing decision and not to renew the authorisation of the GM soybean. It also asks the Commission to require an updated assessment of nutritional and compositional changes, to take account of current risk-assessment methodologies, and to strengthen post-market monitoring.
Jobs, social affairs & equality
Objections · motion for a resolution · 3 ballots · voted 13:50 · B-10-2026-0469 · 2026/2880
Adopted 442–196–9 · by a large majority
Tuesday, 20 October 2026 1 match
-
Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act
Certification methodologies for carbon farming activitiesWritten by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The text concerns a Commission delegated regulation that sets out certification methodologies for carbon farming activities under Regulation (EU) 2024/3012, the Union certification framework for permanent carbon removals, carbon farming and carbon storage in products. Parliament rejected the text, so the delegated regulation does not receive Parliament's approval. The motion argues that the proposed methodologies exclude direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions over the lifecycle of certified activities, such as indirect land-use change and livestock emissions, and conflict with the mandate in Article 4(2), point (a)(iii), of Regulation (EU) 2024/3012.
Economy & single marketJustice, rule of law & rights
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 13:30 · B-10-2026-0471 · 2026/2819
Rejected 199–407–45 · by a large majority
Monday, 19 October 2026 5 matches
- Monday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Riots
Agenda · voted 18:11
Rejected 115–317–12 · by a large majority - Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Riots
Agenda · voted 18:12
- Monday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – Riots
Agenda · voted 18:12
Rejected 166–281–1 · by a large majority - Monday’s agenda – Request by the PPE and ECR Groups – Riots
Agenda · voted 18:13
Adopted 282–161–6 · by a large majority - Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – The Trump Administration waiving of sanctions and tariffs required on Russia
Agenda · voted 18:15
Adopted 351–38–55 · by a large majority
Thursday, 8 October 2026 3 matches
-
Objection under Rule 115(2), (3) and (4)(c) · implementing measure
Lead in gunshotWritten by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament considered a draft Commission regulation that would amend the REACH Regulation on chemicals to restrict lead in gunshot. Parliament rejected its objection, so the Commission measure goes ahead. Parliament had opposed adoption of the draft regulation, saying it fails the principle of proportionality and is not compatible with Article 68(1) of the REACH Regulation. It called on the Commission to withdraw the draft and submit a new one after an up-to-date assessment, including of alternatives' availability, costs, weapon compatibility and effects on hunting and sport shooting.
Objections · motion for a resolution · 2 ballots · voted 13:03 · B-10-2026-0432 · 2026/2824
Rejected 193–333–22 · by a clear majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2), (3) and (4)(c) · implementing measure
Certain botanical species containing hydroxyanthracene derivativesWritten by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The draft Commission regulation would prohibit foods containing preparations from certain Rheum, Cassia senna and Rhamnus species where those preparations contain hydroxyanthracene derivatives, moving them from Part C to Part A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006. Parliament rejected the text, so it did not oppose adoption of the draft regulation. Parliament considers the draft regulation exceeds the Commission's implementing powers and calls on the Commission to withdraw it or defer adoption until the Court of Justice rules on the pending appeals. It also calls on the Commission to obtain a complete and up-to-date scientific assessment and to explain whether Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 applies.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 13:04 · B-10-2026-0465
-
Objection under Rule 115(2), (3) and (4)(c) · implementing measure
Monacolins from red yeast riceWritten by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The draft Commission regulation would move monacolins from red yeast rice from Part B to Part A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006, prohibiting their use in foods, including food supplements. Parliament rejected the text, so it did not oppose adoption of the draft Commission regulation. Parliament had considered that the draft regulation exceeds the implementing powers under Article 8 of that Regulation and fails to respect the principle of proportionality.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 13:05 · B-10-2026-0466
Monday, 5 October 2026 1 match
Wednesday, 16 September 2026 3 matches
-
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The text concerns a draft Commission decision to allow products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6 onto the market under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. Parliament adopted the resolution as its official position, objecting to that draft authorisation. Parliament points to scientific uncertainties, gaps in the risk assessment and the lack of a qualified majority among member states, and has repeatedly said the Commission should not authorise such products in those circumstances.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 14:48 · B-10-2026-0380 · 2026/2783
Adopted 442–184–12 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified soybean MON 94313Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament adopted a resolution on a draft Commission decision that would allow products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean MON 94313 to be placed on the market under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. By adopting the text, Parliament made it its official position, stating that the draft decision exceeds the Commission's implementing powers and is not consistent with Union law. Parliament calls on the Commission to withdraw the draft implementing decision and not to authorise the GM soybean, citing insufficient evidence on long-term impacts. It also asks the Commission to submit a legislative proposal to reform the decision-making procedure on genetically modified organisms.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 14:48 · B-10-2026-0379 · 2026/2782
Adopted 457–184–10 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified maize MON 87460Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament adopted a resolution on the draft Commission decision renewing the authorisation for placing on the market products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize MON 87460. Parliament considers that the draft decision exceeds the Commission's implementing powers and is not consistent with Union law, and it calls on the Commission to withdraw the draft decision. Parliament also calls on the Commission not to renew the authorisation of the GM maize, citing the lack of sufficient evidence on long-term impacts on biodiversity, food safety, farmers' livelihoods and animal health, in line with the One Health approach.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 14:49 · B-10-2026-0381 · 2026/2784
Adopted 433–159–10 · by a large majority
Monday, 14 September 2026 1 match
- Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – ECB
Agenda · voted 18:21
Rejected 154–216–85 · by a small majority
Wednesday, 8 July 2026 5 matches
-
Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act
Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targetsWritten by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The European Parliament voted to block a Commission delegated regulation that would have added soybean to the list of high indirect land-use change-risk feedstocks, phasing out soy-based biodiesel from EU renewable energy targets by 2030. The objection passed, meaning the Commission measure is blocked and cannot enter into force. Parliament does not object to the palm oil phase-down or to fixing the certification procedure, and asks the Commission to revise the act accordingly.
Objections · motion for a resolution · 14 ballots · voted 13:09 · B-10-2026-0337 · 2026/2680
Adopted 388–248–24 · by a clear majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3), and (4)(c) · implementing measure
Lead in certain fishing tackleWritten by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The European Parliament voted on a resolution to block a Commission regulation restricting lead in certain fishing tackle under the EU chemicals law REACH. MEPs rejected the objection, so the Commission measure will go ahead as planned. The resolution had argued the restriction lacked evidence on alternatives and proportionality, and asked the Commission to withdraw and re-submit it.
Climate & environmentEconomy & single market
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 13:12 · B-10-2026-0344 · 2026/2714
Rejected 197–455–7 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The European Parliament voted to block a Commission plan to renew the authorisation of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 for use in food, feed, and other products, excluding cultivation. The objection was adopted, meaning the Commission measure is blocked and the renewal cannot go ahead. Parliament cites concerns about herbicide tolerance, potential health and environmental risks, and the lack of member state support.
Objections · motion for a resolution · 3 ballots · voted 13:58 · B-10-2026-0335 · 2026/2745
Adopted 460–189–14 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified soybean MON 87705Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament objected to the Commission's draft decision renewing the authorisation for genetically modified soybean MON 87705 in food, feed, and other products, excluding cultivation. The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the renewal cannot go ahead. Parliament cited concerns about herbicide reliance, potential health and environmental risks, and insufficient long-term studies.
Objections · motion for a resolution · 3 ballots · voted 13:58 · B-10-2026-0334 · 2026/2747
Adopted 466–175–16 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament objected to a Commission decision that would have authorised selling food and feed made from genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations. The objection passed, so the Commission measure is blocked and the maize cannot be placed on the market in the EU. Parliament cited concerns about herbicide tolerance, safety uncertainties, and missing long-term studies.
Agriculture, food & fisheriesHealth
Objections · motion for a resolution · 3 ballots · voted 13:59 · B-10-2026-0336 · 2026/2746
Adopted 417–167–15 · by a large majority
Monday, 6 July 2026 2 matches
- Monday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Italy and Denmark
Agenda · voted 18:16
Adopted 283–142–11 · by a large majority - Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE and The Left groups – Surveillance by illegal spyware
Agenda · voted 18:18
Adopted 221–213–12 · narrowly
Monday, 15 June 2026 2 matches
- Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the S&D Group – AI
Agenda · voted 18:10
Adopted 244–179–15 · by a small majority - Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Middle East
Agenda · voted 18:12
Adopted 336–86–11 · by a large majority
Monday, 18 May 2026 4 matches
- Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in Modena
Agenda · voted 18:12
Adopted 355–86–7 · by a large majority - Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in Modena
Agenda · voted 18:12
Rejected 134–309–3 · by a large majority - Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Reduced US military deployment in Europe
Agenda · voted 18:15
Adopted 342–65–41 · by a large majority - Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel’s air strikes in Lebanon
Agenda · voted 18:16
Rejected 181–259–6 · by a clear majority
Wednesday, 29 April 2026 1 match
-
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified soybean MON 94637Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The European Parliament adopted a resolution objecting to the Commission's draft decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing genetically modified soybean MON 94637. The objection blocks the Commission measure, meaning the GM soybean cannot be authorised for sale in the EU. Parliament calls on the Commission to withdraw its draft decision and to reform the GMO authorisation procedure.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 15:03 · B-10-2026-0186 · 2026/2651
Adopted 412–145–11 · by a large majority
Monday, 27 April 2026 2 matches
- Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – ‘One Europe, one market’
Agenda · voted 18:12
Rejected 132–327–3 · by a large majority - Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislation
Agenda · voted 18:15
Rejected 127–338–5 · by a large majority
Thursday, 26 March 2026 1 match
-
Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act
Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potentialWritten by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The European Parliament voted to reject an objection to a Commission delegated regulation that sets a Union-wide method for calculating the life-cycle global warming potential of buildings. The objection failed, so the Commission measure goes ahead as planned. The Parliament calls on the Commission to submit a new, more limited delegated regulation by the third quarter of 2026.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 11:07 · B-10-2026-0178 · 2025/3044
Rejected 208–414–10 · by a large majority
Wednesday, 25 March 2026 3 matches
- Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Australia
Agenda · voted 15:17
Rejected 134–350–14 · by a large majority - Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group – Iran
Agenda · voted 15:23
- Thursday's agenda – Request by the Verts/ALE Group – Request for withdrawal from voting time
Agenda · voted 15:27
Rejected 163–344–14 · by a large majority
Monday, 9 March 2026 1 match
- Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group
Agenda · voted 17:15
Rejected 87–291–22 · by a large majority
Wednesday, 11 February 2026 4 matches
-
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The European Parliament objected to a Commission draft decision that would have authorised imports of genetically modified soybean DBN-09004-6, engineered to tolerate the herbicides glufosinate and glyphosate. MEPs adopted the objection, blocking the Commission measure and preventing the soybean from being placed on the EU market. Parliament argued the draft decision exceeded the Commission's implementing powers and was inconsistent with EU law on food safety.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 12:26 · B-10-2026-0107 · 2026/2523
Adopted 461–169–22 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified maize T25 (ACS-ZMØØ3-2)Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament objected to a Commission decision that would renew the authorisation of genetically modified maize T25, which is tolerant to the herbicide glufosinate, for use in food, feed, and other products, excluding cultivation. The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the renewal cannot go ahead. Parliament also called on the Commission to withdraw its draft decision and to propose a reform of the decision-making procedure for genetically modified organisms.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 12:26 · B-10-2026-0106 · 2026/2535
Adopted 462–169–22 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified cotton T304-40Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The European Parliament objected to a draft Commission decision that would renew the authorisation for selling products made from genetically modified cotton T304-40, which is resistant to certain pests and tolerant to the herbicide glufosinate. The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the authorisation cannot be renewed. Parliament asks the Commission to withdraw its draft decision and to propose a reform of the decision-making procedure for genetically modified organisms.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 12:27 · B-10-2026-0108 · 2026/2518
Adopted 428–156–22 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament objected to a Commission plan to renew the authorisation of genetically modified cotton GHB614 × LLCotton25 for use in food, feed and other products, excluding cultivation. The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the renewal cannot go ahead. Parliament argued the draft decision exceeds the Commission's powers and is inconsistent with EU law on GMO safety.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 12:27 · B-10-2026-0109 · 2026/2519
Adopted 463–164–21 · by a large majority
Monday, 9 February 2026 2 matches
- Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the Renew Group – Ukraine
Agenda · voted 17:10
Adopted 278–121–16 · by a large majority - Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Israel
Agenda · voted 17:12
Rejected 171–217–34 · by a small majority
Wednesday, 17 December 2025 1 match
-
Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act
Simplification of the content and presentation of information to be disclosed concerning environmentally sustainable activities and simplification of certain technical screening criteria for determining whether economic activities cause no significant harm to environmental objectivesWritten by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The Commission's delegated regulation simplifies reporting on environmentally sustainable activities and the technical screening criteria for the 'do no significant harm' principle. Parliament rejected the objection, so the Commission measure goes ahead as planned. The regulation narrows the scope of substances of very high concern covered and introduces a materiality threshold for reporting.
Climate & environmentEconomy & single market
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 12:28 · B-10-2025-0566 · 2025/2806
Rejected 230–402–28 · by a clear majority
Tuesday, 16 December 2025 2 matches
-
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified maize NK603Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament objected to a Commission plan to renew the authorisation of genetically modified maize NK603, which is tolerant to glyphosate, for use in food, feed and other products, excluding cultivation. The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the renewal cannot go ahead. Parliament called on the Commission to withdraw its decision and not to renew the authorisation, citing concerns about long-term impacts on biodiversity, food safety, farmers' livelihoods and animal health.
Agriculture, food & fisheriesHealth
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 13:14 · B-10-2025-0562 · 2025/2958
Adopted 479–173–8 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament objected to a Commission draft decision that would authorise selling food, food ingredients and feed made from genetically modified sugar beet KWS20-1 in the EU. The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the authorisation cannot go ahead. Parliament asks the Commission to withdraw its implementing decision.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 13:15 · B-10-2025-0559 · 2025/2959
Adopted 455–169–8 · by a large majority
Monday, 15 December 2025 4 matches
- Monday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group (epizootic)
Agenda · voted 17:14
Adopted 240–194–2 · by a small majority - Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group (Australia and Bavaria)
Agenda · voted 17:19
Rejected 130–316–3 · by a large majority - Tuesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group (tanker)
Agenda · voted 17:22
Rejected 181–261–9 · by a clear majority - Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group (preventing sexual harassment)
Agenda · voted 17:24
Adopted 323–112–12 · by a large majority
Wednesday, 26 November 2025 2 matches
-
Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act
Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weaponsWritten by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The Commission adopted a delegated regulation that changes the definition of prohibited weapons used to decide which companies can be excluded from EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks and EU Climate Transition Benchmarks. Parliament rejected its own objection, so the Commission measure goes ahead and the new definition applies. The objection had asked Parliament to block the delegated regulation and to call on the Commission to submit a new delegated act excluding companies active in nuclear weapons, depleted uranium and certain weapons covered by the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.
Objections · motion for a resolution · 5 ballots · voted 12:49 · B-10-2025-0502 · 2025/2847
Rejected 88–388–184 · by a clear majority -
Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act
Amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western SaharaWritten by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The Commission proposed a delegated regulation on origin labelling for fruit and vegetables from Western Sahara, a non-self-governing territory distinct from Morocco. Parliament rejected the objection to this measure, so the Commission's regulation will go ahead. The resolution had objected that the labelling could mislead consumers about the true origin, contrary to EU food information rules.
Agriculture, food & fisheriesEconomy & single marketTrade & customs
Objections · motion for a resolution · 10 ballots · voted 12:51 · B-10-2025-0506 · 2025/2943
Tuesday, 25 November 2025 5 matches
-
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified maize DAS1131Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The European Parliament adopted a resolution objecting to the Commission's draft decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing genetically modified maize DAS1131. The objection blocks the Commission measure, meaning the maize cannot be authorised for sale in the EU under this procedure. Parliament calls on the Commission to withdraw its draft decision and not to authorise the maize, citing insufficient evidence on long-term impacts.
Agriculture, food & fisheriesHealth
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 12:58 · B-10-2025-0489 · 2025/2893
Adopted 453–171–19 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified cotton MON 88913Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The European Parliament objected to the Commission's draft decision renewing the authorisation of genetically modified cotton MON 88913 for products containing, consisting of, or produced from it. The objection was adopted, blocking the Commission measure, so the renewal authorisation does not go ahead. Parliament calls on the Commission to withdraw the draft decision and not to renew the authorisation, citing concerns about herbicide use, biodiversity, and insufficient long-term safety evidence. It also asks the Commission to propose reforming the decision-making procedure for genetically modified organisms.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 12:59 · B-10-2025-0492 · 2025/2894
Adopted 452–182–13 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified oilseed rape MON 88302Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament objected to the Commission's draft decision renewing the authorisation of genetically modified oilseed rape MON 88302 for products containing or produced from it. The objection was adopted, blocking the Commission measure and preventing the renewal from taking effect. Parliament calls on the Commission to withdraw its draft decision and not to renew the authorisation, citing concerns about gene flow, environmental persistence, and herbicide use.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 12:59 · B-10-2025-0490 · 2025/2895
Adopted 456–166–21 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified soybean MON 87708Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The European Parliament voted to block the Commission's draft decision renewing the authorisation for genetically modified soybean MON 87708, which is tolerant to the herbicide dicamba. The objection was adopted, meaning the Commission measure is blocked and the authorisation cannot be renewed as proposed. Parliament calls on the Commission to withdraw the draft decision and not to renew the authorisation, citing risks from dicamba use and environmental impacts. It also asks the Commission to propose a reform of the decision-making procedure for genetically modified organisms.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 12:59 · B-10-2025-0493 · 2025/2896
Adopted 453–179–14 · by a large majority -
Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure
Genetically modified maize MON 87427Written by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Parliament objected to the Commission's draft decision renewing the authorisation of genetically modified maize MON 87427 for food, feed, and other uses except cultivation. The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the authorisation renewal cannot go ahead. Parliament calls on the Commission to withdraw the draft decision and not to renew the authorisation, citing risks from glyphosate use and insufficient long-term evidence. It also asks the Commission to propose reforming the GMO decision-making procedure to address Parliament's objections and the lack of qualified majority among member states.
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 13:00 · B-10-2025-0491 · 2025/2897
Adopted 426–157–17 · by a large majority
Monday, 24 November 2025 3 matches
- Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE, S&D, Renew and Verts/ALE groups – Ukraine (resolution)
Agenda · voted 17:12
Adopted 301–103–33 · by a large majority - Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – Gaza
Agenda · voted 17:15
Rejected 173–244–16 · by a clear majority
Thursday, 23 October 2025 1 match
-
Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act
InvestEU Fund strategic investments in the field of defenceWritten by an AI from the text voted on. The outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. The Commission delegated regulation of 28 August 2025 broadens the definition of eligible strategic investments under the InvestEU Fund to include more defence technologies and products for military use, and extends eligibility to entities in associated countries or controlled by non-associated countries under certain conditions. Parliament rejected the objection, so the Commission measure goes ahead and the expanded defence investment rules will apply. Parliament had asked the Commission to refrain from using delegated acts to change InvestEU's scope and to submit any further changes as a legislative proposal under the ordinary legislative procedure.
Economy & single marketDefence & securityEU budget & funds
Objections · motion for a resolution · voted 13:04 · B-10-2025-0456 · 2025/2846
Rejected 124–401–41 · by a large majority