← 28 April 30 April →

Plenary sitting, Wednesday, 29 April 2026

MEPs decided on 27 subjects between 13:14 and 15:03 — 27 adopted. That took 648 ballots, 298 of them by roll call with every MEP’s position recorded.

27
subjects decided
27 / 0
adopted / rejected
648
ballots, incl. 185 amendments
298
roll calls (per-MEP record)
Tightest result of the day: Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 — Adopted 328–199
New here? How plenary voting works and how to read this page

A sitting is one day of voting in the Parliament’s plenary. Everything voted that day is listed here by subject — a report, resolution, agreement or objection the Parliament is deciding on. Subjects are sorted into sections by what kind of decision they are (new laws, international agreements, non-binding resolutions, …); each section explains what “adopted” means there.

Each subject can involve many ballots. MEPs first vote on amendments (proposed changes) and on parts of the text a group asked to vote on separately, then hold the decisive vote on the whole text — that is the result shown at the top of every subject. The strip of squares and circles under it shows all the ballots in the order they were taken; open the list to see each one.

Only roll-call votes record how each MEP voted — click one to see every individual position and the full breakdown by political group. The row of group badges (✓ mostly for, ✗ mostly against, – mostly abstained, ~ split) shows which groups backed a result. Votes by show of hands record only the outcome.

Every subject is based on a document (a committee report, a motion for a resolution, or a Council/Commission text) and belongs to a procedure — the full legislative file that can span years. The buttons on each subject take you to both.

Glossary: Am 27 = amendment 27 · § 5 = paragraph 5 · part 1/2 = a paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts (a split vote) · separate vote = a paragraph voted on its own, usually so a group can vote against it · = joins identical amendments voted together · 1st reading (***I) = Parliament’s first pass at a proposed law · Lapsed = fell away without a vote because an earlier vote settled the matter.

New EU laws

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

1

Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products

Committee report by Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller · 1st reading · voted 14:16–14:21

📄 Report A-10-2026-0104 Full procedure 2025/0531
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 540 Against 60 Abstained 45

Final vote at 14:21 · 84% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN –
  • NI ~

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by The Left; ESN mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 37 ballots

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 13 amendments (13 rejected) and 20 parts of the text voted on separately (7 adopted, 10 rejected, 3 lapsed). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 37 ballots in voting order
1. Proposal to reject the text 14:16 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Proposal for rejection – Am 90
Rejected
2. Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Separate vote: article 1, paragraph 1, point 2 Article 1, § 1, point 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Separate vote: article 1, paragraph 1, point 2 Article 1, § 1, point 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Separate vote: article 1, paragraph 1, point 4 Article 1, § 1, point 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Separate vote: article 1, paragraph 1, point 4 Article 1, § 1, point 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Separate vote: article 1, paragraph 1, point 5 Article 1, § 1, point 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Separate vote: article 1, paragraph 1, point 5 Article 1, § 1, point 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Separate vote: article 1, paragraph 1, point 5 Article 1, § 1, point 5
Lapsed
10. Separate vote: article 1, paragraph 1, point 6 Article 1, § 1, point 6
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
11. Separate vote: article 1, paragraph 1, point 6 Article 1, § 1, point 6
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Amendment 116 14:17 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, before § 1 – Am 116 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
13. Separate vote: article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i Article 2, § 1, point 2, point a, point i
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
14. Separate vote: article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i Article 2, § 1, point 2, point a, point i
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
15. Amendment 117 14:17 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point a, point i – Am 117 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
16. Amendment 104 14:17 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point a, point i – Am 104 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
17. Amendment 95 14:17 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point a – Am 95 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
18. Separate vote: article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
19. Separate vote: article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b
Lapsed
20. Amendment 96 14:18 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b – Am 96 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
21. Amendment 105 14:18 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b – Am 105 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
22. Separate vote: article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
23. Amendment 97 14:18 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b – Am 97 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
24. Amendment 101 14:19 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, after point 2 – Am 101 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, The Left
Rejected
25. Separate vote: recital 2 Recital 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
26. Amendment 98 14:19 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – After recital 2 – Am 98 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
27. Amendment 91 14:19 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – After recital 15 – Am 91 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
28. Amendment 92 14:19 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – After recital 15 – Am 92 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
29. Separate vote: after recital 15 After recital 15
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
30. Amendment 93 14:20 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Recital 22 – Am 93 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
31. Separate vote: recital 22 Recital 22
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
32. Separate vote: recital 22 Recital 22
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
33. Separate vote: recital 22 Recital 22
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
34. Amendments 114 + 100 (voted as one) 14:20 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – After recital 22 – Am 114= 100= Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
35. Separate vote: after recital 22 After recital 22
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
36. Final vote 14:21 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Commission proposal
Adopted
37. Referral back to committee Request for referral back to committee
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2

Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sector

Committee report by Danuše Nerudová · 1st reading · voted 14:22–14:26

📄 Report A-10-2026-0098 Full procedure 2025/0380
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 433 Against 120 Abstained 91

Final vote at 14:26 · 67% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✗

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ESN; opposed by ECR and PfE.

How the vote unfolded · 25 ballots

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 10 amendments (3 adopted, 7 rejected) and 9 parts of the text voted on separately (9 rejected). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, ECR, PfE, Members · split votes by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 25 ballots in voting order
1. Proposal to reject the text Proposal for rejection
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Amendment 1 14:22 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 1 Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
4. Amendment 4 14:22 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 4 Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
5. Amendment 8 14:22 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 8 Roll call requested by ECR, PfE, Members
Adopted
6. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Amendment 25 14:23 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – Article 1, § 1, point 4 – Am 25 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
9. Amendment 20 14:23 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – After Article 1 – Am 20 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
10. Amendment 26 14:23 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – After Article 1 – Am 26 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
11. Amendment 27 14:23 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – After Article 1 – Am 27 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
12. Separate vote: after Article 1 After Article 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
13. Separate vote: after Article 1 After Article 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
14. Separate vote: article 2 Article 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
15. Separate vote: after recital 3 After recital 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
16. Separate vote: after recital 3 After recital 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
17. Separate vote: after recital 4 After recital 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
18. Separate vote: after recital 4 After recital 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
19. Amendment 17 14:25 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – After recital 6 – Am 17 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
20. Separate vote: after recital 6 After recital 6
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
21. Separate vote: after recital 6 After recital 6
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
22. Amendment 23 14:26 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – After recital 6 – Am 23 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
23. Amendment 24 14:26 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – After recital 6 – Am 24 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
24. Final vote 14:26 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – Commission proposal
Adopted
25. Referral back to committee 14:26 A10-0098/2026 – Danuše Nerudová – request for referral back to committee
Adopted
3

European Chemicals Agency and amending regulations

Committee report by Christophe Clergeau · 1st reading · voted at 14:28

📄 Report A-10-2026-0093 Full procedure 2025/0207
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 526 Against 56 Abstained 69

Final vote at 14:28 · 81% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by ESN; PfE mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 2 ballots

Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 2 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote 14:28 A10-0093/2026 – Christophe Clergeau – Commission proposal and amendments
Adopted
2. Referral back to committee Request for referral back to committee
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted

International agreements & consent

Treaties and agreements Parliament can only approve or refuse as a whole — no amendments are possible.

Budget & emergency funds

Spending decisions: amending budgets, solidarity and adjustment funds.

9

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Commission

Committee report by Daniel Freund · voted 13:16–13:29

📄 Report A-10-2026-0085 Full procedure 2025/2145
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

The spending was approved.

For 418 Against 207 Abstained 14

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:29 · 65% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 98 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 34 amendments (2 adopted, 32 rejected) and 61 parts of the text voted on separately (38 adopted, 23 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, ECR, PfE, ESN · split votes by Renew, ECR (2), PfE (12) · separate votes by Renew, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 98 ballots in voting order
1. Proposals for decisions
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Paragraph 2 — part 1 of 2 § 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘for sound financial management of the Union budget and that the Commission has a wide range of instruments at its disposal to ensure respect for these principles; notes with serious concern the continued backsliding with regard to the rule of law and systemic corruption and attacks on fundamental rights in several Member States, with direct implications for the sound management of Union funds, notes that the lack of Union funds has an alarming effect on the provision of public services; highlights in particular the deteriorating situation in Hungary, marked by widespread corruption and entrenched oligarchic networks, which requires continued attention; deplores that, while problems persist or worsen, the pressure exerted by the Commission to induce meaningful reforms has diminished as the amounts of funds that remain frozen are decreasing; stresses that the Commission needs to move beyond monitoring and to make full and consistent use of the available instruments to suspend or protect Union funding where rule of law deficiencies affect sound financial management in all Member States concerned;’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Paragraph 2 — part 2 of 2 § 2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Amendment 9 13:16 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 3 – Am 9 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
8. Amendment 31 13:16 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 6 – Am 31 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
9. Separate vote: paragraph 7 § 7
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Amendment 10 13:17 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 7 – Am 10 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
11. Amendment 30 13:17 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 7 – Am 30 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
12. Amendment 11 13:17 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 9 – Am 11 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
13. Amendment 36 13:17 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 9 – Am 36 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
14. Amendment 12 13:17 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 11 – Am 12 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
15. Separate vote: paragraph 13 § 13
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
16. Amendment 32 13:18 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 13 – Am 32 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
17. Amendment 13 13:18 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 13 – Am 13 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
18. Separate vote: after paragraph 13 After § 13
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
19. Separate vote: after paragraph 13 After § 13
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
20. Amendment 3 13:18 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 14 – Am 3 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
21. Paragraph 14 — part 1 of 2 § 14 Part 1: ‘Notes that, under the Treaties, civil society organisations are legitimate beneficiaries of Union funding and frequently support the attainment of Union objectives;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
22. Paragraph 14 — part 2 of 2 § 14 Part 2: ‘stresses that budgetary control, safeguards and transparency requirements must be applied in a neutral, proportionate and evidence-based way, with due regard for legal certainty; highlights that selective transparency can undermine confidence in the discharge process, and that effective scrutiny requires the consistent application of comparable standards to all beneficiaries; takes note of the Scrutiny Working Group established within Parliament in this regard;' Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
23. Amendment 14 13:18 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 14 – Am 14 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
24. Amendment 15 13:19 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 14 – Am 15 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
25. Paragraph 15 — part 1 of 2 § 15 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and highlights that CSOs may receive support from Union funds,’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
26. Paragraph 15 — part 2 of 2 § 15 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
27. Amendment 7 13:19 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 15 – Am 7
Rejected
28. Amendment 16 13:19 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 15 – Am 16 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
29. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
30. Separate vote: paragraph 20, point i § 20, point i
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
31. Amendment 47 13:20 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 20, point vi – Am 47 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
32. Amendment 48 13:20 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 20, point vii – Am 48 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
33. Amendment 49 13:20 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 20, point x – Am 49 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
34. Separate vote: paragraph 30 § 30
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
35. Separate vote: paragraph 46 § 46 Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
36. Paragraph 46 — part 2 13:20 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 46/2 Part 2: ‘stresses that, in the context of rising debt levels, the development of genuine new own resources is essential to prevent debt servicing costs from crowding out priorities under future multiannual financial frameworks;’ Split vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
37. Amendment 25 13:20 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 47 – Am 25
Rejected
38. Separate vote: paragraph 56 13:21 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 56 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
39. Amendment 35 13:21 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 68 – Am 35 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
40. Amendment 17 13:21 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 81 – Am 17 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
41. Amendment 18 13:21 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 86 – Am 18 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
42. Paragraph 103 — part 1 of 2 § 103 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the findings in the 2025 Rule of Law Report regarding the rule of law situation in Hungary,’ and ‘and the continuous reporting by the Hungarian Integrity Authority of obstacles in fulfilling its oversight tasks effectively;’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
43. Paragraph 103 — part 2 of 2 § 103 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
44. Paragraph 104 — part 1 of 2 § 104 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘reminds that on 25 March 2024, the European Parliament brought an action before the Court of Justice in order to review the legality of the Commission decision,’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
45. Paragraph 104 — part 2 of 2 § 104 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
46. Paragraph 105 — part 1 of 2 § 105 Part 1: ‘Notes that from the EUR 19,8 billion allocations under the CPR, initially blocked due to fundamental rights concerns, only EUR 7,6 billion remain blocked for the Hungarian government in January 2026; further notes that from the EUR 6,4 billion initially blocked under the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation because of rule of law and corruption concerns, EUR 1 and 1,1 billion have been decommitted at the end of 2024 and 2025 respectively;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
47. Paragraph 105 — part 2 of 2 § 105 Part 2: ‘expresses deep concern that, while the rule law continues to deteriorate and corruption flourishes through entrenched oligarchic networks in Hungary, the amount of Union funds that remains frozen due to rule of law and corruption concerns decreases, and consequently, the pressure applied by the Commission on the Hungarian government to make reforms shrinks constantly;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
48. Paragraph 106 — part 1 of 2 § 106 Part 1: ‘Notes the requests by the Hungarian government on 28 and 29 March 2025 to transfer EUR 545 million from two cohesion programmes to new priorities under the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform (STEP), of which EUR 395 million from funds frozen’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
49. Paragraph 106 — part 2 of 2 § 106 Part 2: ‘due to the failure to meet the horizontal enabling condition under the Charter of Fundamental Rights; deeply regrets the Commission’s approval of the amendments on 25 September 2025, that despite again blocking reimbursements for the new STEP priorities due to non-compliance with Charter requirements, nevertheless gave the Hungarian government access to EUR 317,3 million in pre-financing; reaffirms that the reallocation or reshuffling of frozen appropriations to other programmes or objectives would signal to governments non-compliant with Union values and with their obligations to protect the Union’s financial interests that losses can be offset elsewhere; recalls its position that funds suspended pursuant to the Conditionality Regulation or due to non-fulfilment of horizontal enabling conditions should not be eligible for programme amendments or transfers; calls, therefore, on the Commission to exercise its right of initiative and propose measures to close any existing loopholes in the Union’s legislative framework that may enable governments to transfer funds suspended due to breaches of their rule of law or other Charter of Fundamental Rights obligations, and ensure that any future funding instruments are proofed for circumvention;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
50. Paragraph 107 — part 1 of 2 § 107 Part 1: ‘Notes that MOL Plc, a publicly listed Hungarian petrochemical conglomerate, is effectively controlled through three so-called public interest trusts affiliated with the Hungarian Government, each holding a 10 % share; recalls that Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/2506 of 15 December 2022 prohibits the Commission from entering into new legal commitments, under direct or indirect management, with Hungarian public interest trusts and entities maintained by them when implementing the Union budget;' Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
51. Paragraph 107 — part 2 of 2 § 107 Part 2: ‘notes with concern that at least one funding agreement appears to have been concluded between the Commission and MOL after the adoption of that Decision; takes note of the Commission’s reply that it is investigating the matter, and expects the Commission to provide the discharge authority without delay with a clear explanation of how such a commitment could have been signed;' Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
52. Paragraph 108 — part 1 of 2 § 108 Part 1: ‘Notes that the Hungarian government is set to receive the third-largest allocation under the SAFE instrument, amounting to EUR 16,2 billion, intended to support major defence-industry investments;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
53. Paragraph 108 — part 2 of 2 § 108 Part 2: ‘recalls that the Commission has the power to withhold approval of national defence investment plans under SAFE where there are concerns regarding the protection of the Union’s financial interests; notes that the Hungarian government recently sold a controlling 75 %+1 vote majority stake in its state defence-industry holding to 4iG, a company widely seen as close to the government; strongly warns that, in light of the continued deterioration of the rule of law, persistent corruption risks and systemic weaknesses in oversight as described above, the Union’s financial interests cannot be considered adequately protected if SAFE funding were to be disbursed to the Hungarian government without, at the very least, setting strict conditions that must be met prior to any disbursement of funds;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
54. Amendment 37 13:23 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 108 – Am 37 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
55. Paragraph 109 — part 1 of 4 § 109 Part 1: ‘Highlights with alarm that since the 2024 Rule of Law Report, Slovakia adopted a series of amendments to the Criminal Code, passed in the second half of 2024, including the closure of specialised anti-corruption entities, the National Crime Agency and the Special Prosecutor’s Office, which resulted in delays in investigations transferred to other bodies and significant drops in the number of corruption cases;’ Split vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
56. Paragraph 109 — part 2 of 4 § 109 Part 2: ‘notes with concern Slovakia’s Government plan to replace the current office for whistleblowers with an institution whose chair would be appointed directly by the parliamentary speaker, which risks politicising the office, aligning its work with the Government’s priorities, scaling back protection of whistleblowers, and undercutting scrutiny of how the Government handles Union funds;’ Split vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
57. Paragraph 109 — part 3 of 4 § 109 Part 3: 'stresses that these developments pose an increased, substantial risk to the sound financial management of the Union budget; emphasises that the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation is not limited to last-resort measures,’ Split vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
58. Paragraph 109 — part 4 of 4 § 109 Part 4: ‘but also allows for early action with partial suspensions where rule of law breaches are identified that pose a serious risk to the sound financial management of the Union budget; fully supports the Commission’s decision and calls on the Commission to start the first step of the conditionality mechanism and to launch an infringement proceeding regarding this matter;’ Split vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
59. Amendment 50 13:23 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 117 – Am 50 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
60. Paragraph 117 — part 1 of 2 § 117 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘considers that Union support for media can contribute to strengthening media pluralism and informed public debate across the Union, provided that strict safeguards are in place to ensure full editorial independence and transparency;’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
61. Paragraph 117 — part 2 of 2 § 117 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
62. Separate vote: paragraph 120, point vii § 120, point vii
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
63. Amendment 39 13:24 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 120, after point vii – Am 39 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
64. Separate vote: paragraph 120, point ix § 120, point ix
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
65. Separate vote: paragraph 157 § 157
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
66. Separate vote: after paragraph 157 After § 157
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
67. Separate vote: paragraph 158 § 158
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
68. Amendment 40 13:24 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 160, after point vii – Am 40 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
69. Separate vote: paragraph 160, point xvi § 160, point xvi
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
70. Separate vote: paragraph 170 § 170
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
71. Amendment 51 13:26 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 171 – Am 51 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
72. Amendment 52 13:26 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 172 – Am 52 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
73. Amendment 53 13:26 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 173 – Am 53 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
74. Separate vote: paragraph 177, point iii § 177, point iii
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
75. Separate vote: paragraph 177, point vii § 177, point vii Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
76. Paragraph 177, point vii — part 2 13:27 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 177, point vii/2 Part 2: ‘and the principle of non-refoulement;’ Split vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
77. Separate vote: paragraph 200 § 200 Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
78. Separate vote: paragraph 200 § 200 Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
79. Separate vote: paragraph 201 § 201 Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
80. Separate vote: paragraph 201 § 201 Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
81. Amendment 56 13:27 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 202 – Am 56 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
82. Separate vote: paragraph 202 § 202 Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
83. Paragraph 205 — part 1 of 2 § 205 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Hungarian’ (twice)” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
84. Paragraph 205 — part 2 of 2 § 205 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
85. Paragraph 206 — part 1 of 2 § 206 Part 1: ‘Notes that Commissioners exercise significant political and regulatory authority and their conduct must therefore reflect the highest standards of independence, transparency, accountability, and ethical behaviour; stresses that strict adherence to the Code of Conduct for Members of the European Commission is essential to safeguarding the integrity, credibility, and democratic legitimacy of the Union’s executive; underlines that full compliance with the Code of Conduct is also indispensable to preventing conflicts of interest, avoiding undue influence, and ensuring that decisions are taken solely in the European interest;' Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
86. Paragraph 206 — part 2 of 2 § 206 Part 2: ‘considers that, taken together, the past serious and prolonged management failures in DG NEAR, the provision of inaccurate information to Parliament in the context of the discharge procedure, and the additional concerns relating to conduct and independence outlined above demonstrate a pattern that is incompatible with the standards of accountability, reliability and sound administration required of a Member of the Commission;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
87. Separate vote: after paragraph 212 After § 212
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
88. Separate vote: after paragraph 216 After § 216
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
89. Amendment 20 13:28 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 226 – Am 20 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
90. Amendment 21 13:28 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 237 – Am 21 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
91. Separate vote: after paragraph 237 After § 237
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
92. Separate vote: after paragraph 247, point iii After § 247, point iii
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
93. Separate vote: paragraph 247, point iv § 247, point iv
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
94. Amendment 28 13:29 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 247, after point iv – Am 28 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
95. Separate vote: paragraph 247, after point iv § 247, after point iv
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
96. Amendment 45 13:29 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – § 253 – Am 45D Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
97. Amendment 46 13:29 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – After § 253 – Am 46 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
98. Final vote — text as a whole 13:29 A10-0085/2026 – Daniel Freund – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
10

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament

Committee report by Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy · voted 13:30–13:44

📄 Report A-10-2026-0081 Full procedure 2025/2146
Adopted Adopted

The spending was approved.

Final vote — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 97 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 21 amendments (21 rejected) and 74 parts of the text voted on separately (35 adopted, 39 rejected).

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, ECR, PfE, Members · split votes by Verts/ALE (2), Renew, PPE (5), PfE (8) · separate votes by Verts/ALE, PPE, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 97 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote Proposal for a decision
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Amendment 27 13:30 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 1 – Am 27 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
3. Separate vote: paragraph 6 § 6
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Amendment 29 13:30 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 7 – Am 29 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
5. Separate vote: paragraph 10 § 10
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Amendment 31 13:30 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 11 – Am 31 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
7. Amendment 32 13:30 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 12 – Am 32 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
8. Separate vote: paragraph 19 § 19
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 2 § 13 Part 1: ‘Recalls that the Union budget may be awarded to European political parties in view of their contribution to forming European political awareness and to expressing the political will of the citizens of the Union; notes that the Court audited one transaction, where it considered the expenditure ineligible, and found that Parliament’s administration was of the same opinion and had taken steps to recover the related expenditure; welcomes the conduct of Parliament’s administration in that regard,’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 2 § 13 Part 2: ‘and in particular its commitment to applying a horizontal approach, guaranteeing equal treatment of all political parties;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Separate vote: after paragraph 23 After § 23
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
12. Paragraph 21 — part 1 13:31 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 21/1 Part 1: ‘Stresses that Parliament’s administration has transmitted the case file and cooperates fully with the EPPO’s investigation; notes that the Bureau awaits to know the outcome of the EPPO’s investigation before taking any recovery action; calls upon the Bureau to provide Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control a written update on the state of play before the next discharge cycle starts; calls on Parliament’s administration to take all the necessary measures parallel to the EPPO’s criminal investigation, administrative interim protective measures (including precautionary set-offs and/or reserves, where legally feasible) to protect the Union’s financial interests and Parliament’s reputation; considers that, according to Article 3(3) of the Working Arrangement between the European Parliament and the European Public Prosecutor's Office, the EPPO will inform Parliament about ongoing or closed investigations in which Parliament appears to be in a position to take precautionary measures to protect the financial interests of the Union including disciplinary procedures or recovery procedures within the applicable time limits;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
13. Paragraph 21 — part 2 13:31 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 21/2 Part 2: ‘notes that criminal proceedings should not be automatically used as a generalised justification for possible inaction;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
14. Separate vote: paragraph 26 § 26 Separate vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
15. Amendment 35 13:32 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 29 – Am 35 Roll call requested by S&D, PfE
Rejected
16. Paragraph 29 — part 1 of 2 § 29 Part 1: ‘Notes that the Commission has acknowledged allegations regarding the use of Union funds for advocacy activities targeting Parliament by several entities but has stated that such activities fall within the scope of the applicable regulation;’ Split vote requested by Verts/ALE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
17. Paragraph 29 — part 2 of 2 § 29 Part 2: ‘recognises, however, that this might have nonetheless entailed reputational risks;’ Split vote requested by Verts/ALE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
18. Separate vote: paragraph 30 § 30
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
19. Amendment 38 13:32 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 31 – Am 38 Roll call requested by S&D, PfE
Rejected
20. Separate vote: paragraph 34 § 34
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
21. Paragraph 39 — part 1 of 4 § 39 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘mainstreaming and budgeting’, ‘urges consistent gender budgeting in Parliament’s budget and the incorporation of a gender mainstreaming guide;’ and ‘further calls for strengthened gender mainstreaming across parliamentary committees;’” Split vote requested by PfE, PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
22. Paragraph 39 — part 2 of 4 § 39 Part 2: ‘mainstreaming and budgeting’ Split vote requested by PfE, PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
23. Paragraph 39 — part 3 of 4 § 39 Part 3: ‘urges consistent gender budgeting in Parliament’s budget and the incorporation of a gender mainstreaming guide;’ Split vote requested by PfE, PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
24. Paragraph 39 — part 4 of 4 § 39 Part 4: ‘further calls for strengthened gender mainstreaming across parliamentary committees;’ Split vote requested by PfE, PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
25. Separate vote: after paragraph 39 After § 39
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
26. Separate vote: after paragraph 39 After § 39
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
27. Amendment 39 13:33 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 43 – Am 39 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
28. Amendment 15 13:33 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 44 – Am 15 Roll call requested by Renew
Rejected
29. Separate vote: paragraph 44 § 44
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
30. Amendment 40 13:34 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 46 – Am 40 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
31. Paragraph 51 — part 1 of 2 § 51 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘stakeholders and opinion leaders’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
32. Paragraph 51 — part 2 of 2 § 51 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
33. Amendment 41 13:34 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 53 – Am 41 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
34. Separate vote: after paragraph 54 After § 54
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
35. Separate vote: paragraph 56 § 56
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
36. Separate vote: paragraph 56 § 56
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
37. Amendment 43 13:34 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 58 – Am 43 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
38. Separate vote: paragraph 59 § 59 Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
39. Separate vote: paragraph 59 § 59 Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
40. Separate vote: paragraph 59 § 59 Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
41. Separate vote: paragraph 65 § 65 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
42. Paragraph 67 — part 1 of 2 § 67 Part 1: ‘Acknowledges that the work of APAs is an integral part of the work of Members and therefore of Parliament; notes that following the adoption of the APA statute in 2009, their status over the years has been protected by the rules; notes the efforts made by Parliament to create a framework for providing support to APAs; calls for due adherence to the rules in place; notes, that since then, APAs participate in official missions to Parliament’s three places of work; welcomes that the rules concerning the reimbursement of APA’s missions between the three place of work have been aligned with those applicable to officials, ensuring equality of treatment for APAs; calls on the Bureau and on Parliament’s administration to formally consult the APA Committee on revisions and reforms that directly impact the rights of APAs; calls on Parliament's administration to explore the feasibility of introducing a notice period within APA's contracts in the event of the unexpected departure of a Member;’ Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
43. Paragraph 67 — part 2 of 2 § 67 Part 2: ‘reiterates its call on the Conference of Presidents and the Bureau to revise the implementing provisions governing the work of delegations and missions outside the Union; underlines that such a revision should consider the possibility for APAs, subject to certain conditions, to accompany Members on official Parliament delegations and missions; highlights that this change would not result in any change to the envelope and would be budget neutral;' Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
44. Separate vote: after paragraph 67 After § 67
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
45. Separate vote: after paragraph 67 After § 67
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
46. Paragraph 68 — part 1 of 2 § 68 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘invites the Bureau to explore the possibility of allowing APAs, under yet to be determined conditions, to participate in internal competitions in a similar way to Parliament’s staff;’” Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
47. Paragraph 68 — part 2 of 2 § 68 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
48. Separate vote: after paragraph 71 After § 71
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
49. Separate vote: after paragraph 72 After § 72
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
50. Separate vote: paragraph 73 § 73
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
51. Separate vote: paragraph 73 § 73
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
52. Separate vote: paragraph 74 § 74 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
53. Amendment 14 13:36 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 75 – Am 14 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
54. Separate vote: after paragraph 77 After § 77
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
55. Amendment 46 13:37 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 80 – Am 46 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
56. Separate vote: paragraph 80 § 80 Separate vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
57. Separate vote: after paragraph 80 After § 80
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
58. Separate vote: after paragraph 80 After § 80
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
59. Amendment 47 13:37 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 81 – Am 47 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
60. Amendment 48 13:38 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 82 – Am 48 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
61. Separate vote: after paragraph 85 After § 85
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
62. Separate vote: after paragraph 86 After § 86
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
63. Separate vote: after paragraph 87 After § 87
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
64. Separate vote: paragraph 94 § 94
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
65. Amendment 53 13:38 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 94 – Am 53 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
66. Separate vote: after paragraph 103 After § 103
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
67. Separate vote: paragraph 105 § 105 Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
68. Separate vote: paragraph 105 § 105 Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
69. Separate vote: paragraph 105 § 105 Split vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
70. Separate vote: after paragraph 105 After § 105
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
71. Separate vote: paragraph 106 § 106 Separate vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
72. Separate vote: after paragraph 106 After § 106
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
73. Separate vote: paragraph 118 § 118
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
74. Separate vote: after paragraph 121 After § 121
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
75. Amendment 26 13:40 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 122 – Am 26 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
76. Paragraph 122 — part 1 of 2 § 122 Part 1: ‘Welcomes the increased use of the Transparency Register as an information and reference tool for interest representation activities at Union level; welcomes the development of IT solutions to improve the Transparency Register, but notes that its Secretariat is still underfunded and understaffed; notes that the quality of entries in the Transparency Register has improved and recalls the necessity to keep strengthening data quality checks of new applicants; welcomes the establishment of robust standards at Parliament with regard to transparency and access to institutions for entities listed in the Transparency Register; calls for inter-linking the Transparency Register and the Financial Transparency System in order to allow cross-checks of entities listed in the Transparency Register and verify the adequacy of the data submitted; reiterates, in this context, the need for comprehensive financial pre-screening of all entities before they are listed in the Transparency Register, and calls in this respect for the Transparency Register to be provided with adequate resources for its functioning and for the effective enforcement of its internal rules;’ Split vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
77. Paragraph 122 — part 2 of 2 § 122 Part 2: ‘further calls on Parliament’s administration to ensure interinstitutional media transparency and to disclose all media outlets receiving Union funds;’ Split vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
78. Amendment 13 13:41 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 123 – Am 13D Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
79. Separate vote: paragraph 130 § 130 Separate vote requested by Verts/ALE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
80. Separate vote: paragraph 133 § 133
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
81. Paragraph 137 — part 1 of 2 § 137 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘for two reasons, the first’ and ‘and the fact that the final accounts that were audited for the first half of 2024 of one of the political groups (ID Group) contained serious irregularities; notes that the Vice-Presidents, in the hearing on 8 December, also indicated that there was additional information asked regarding the accounts for the second half of 2024, which was still awaited by the Bureau before taking a decision on providing the information to the discharge authority; notes the letter of 20 January 2026 of the Parliament’s Secretary-General to the Chair of the Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control submitting the audit reports for the second half of 2024 for seven of the eight political groups; notes the unqualified opinion for each report; notes that the report of the PfE Group for the second half of 2024 is still missing because of ongoing exchanges between that political group and Parliament’s competent services; calls on both the PfE Group and Parliament’s competent services to swiftly resolve the open issues and inform the discharge authority of the outcome;’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
82. Paragraph 137 — part 2 of 2 § 137 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
83. Amendment 22 13:41 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 138 – Am 22 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
84. Separate vote: paragraph 138 § 138 Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by S&D
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
85. Paragraph 138 — part 1 13:42 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 138/1 Part 1: ‘Notes media reports accusing the PfE Group of misusing at least EUR 171 644 in funds during the second half of 2024;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
86. Paragraph 138 — part 2 13:42 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 138/2 Part 2: ‘notes that Parliament’s administration has requested clarification from the PfE Group; notes that the discharge authority has not yet been informed but expects to be informed without delay of any further developments and of the outcome of the administrative follow-up in this matter;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
87. Separate vote: paragraph 140 § 140 Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
88. Separate vote: paragraph 140 § 140 Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
89. Separate vote: paragraph 140 § 140 Split vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
90. Separate vote: after paragraph 140 After § 140
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
91. Amendment 57 13:43 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – § 146 – Am 57 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
92. Separate vote: after paragraph 147 After § 147
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
93. Amendment 58 13:44 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – After § 149 – Am 58 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
94. Separate vote: after paragraph 149 After § 149
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
95. Recital H — part 1 of 2 Recital H Part 1: ‘whereas gender equality and the elimination of inequalities are core values of the Union as enshrined in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU); whereas the Union is committed to promoting gender equality in all its activities under Article 8 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, thereby establishing the principle of gender mainstreaming’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
96. Recital H — part 2 of 2 Recital H Part 2: ‘and gender budgeting;’ Split vote requested by PfE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
97. Final vote — text as a whole 13:44 A10-0081/2026 – Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
11

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Council and Council

Committee report by Pasquale Tridico · voted 13:45–13:47

📄 Report A-10-2026-0051 Full procedure 2025/2147
Adopted Adopted

The spending was approved.

Final vote — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 16 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 rejected) and 12 parts of the text voted on separately (8 adopted, 4 rejected).

Roll calls requested by ECR, PfE · split votes by PPE (2) · separate votes by PPE, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 16 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote Proposal for a decision
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Separate vote: paragraph 28 § 28
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote: paragraph 29 § 29 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Amendment 2 13:45 A10-0051/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – § 30 – Am 2 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
5. Amendment 6 13:45 A10-0051/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – § 30 – Am 6 Roll call requested by PfE, ECR
Rejected
6. Separate vote: paragraph 30 13:46 A10-0051/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – § 30 Separate vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
7. Separate vote: paragraph 39 § 39 Separate vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Separate vote: after paragraph 51 After § 51
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Separate vote: after paragraph 53 After § 53
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Separate vote: after paragraph 54 After § 54
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
11. Paragraph 55 — part 1 of 2 § 55 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘binding and enforceable’” Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Paragraph 55 — part 2 of 2 § 55 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
13. Paragraph 58 — part 1 of 3 § 58 Part 1: ‘Regrets the fact that the participation of the Member States’ Permanent Representatives in the mandatory transparency register, set up by the interinstitutional agreement of 20 May 2021 between Parliament, the Council and the Commission, is completely voluntary as the application of the conditionality principle is left to the discretion of each Member State’s Permanent Representation; notes that only a limited number of Member States and the Union institutions abide by the best practice of applying a mandatory broad-scope definition of lobbyist in their regulatory framework and insists that all Permanent Representations should take an active part in the mandatory transparency register before, during and after their Member State’s Council presidency;’ Split vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Paragraph 58 — part 2 of 3 § 58 Part 2: ‘recalls Parliament’s position that Member State representatives who benefit directly from Union subsidies through the businesses they own should not be allowed to participate in policy or budgetary discussions and votes related to those subsidies;’ Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Paragraph 58 — part 3 of 3 § 58 Part 3: ‘regrets that the Council does not fully use the mandatory transparency register or accept proposals to improve it; reiterates its call on the Council to refrain from engaging with unregistered lobbyists and to make sure that its senior officials, including Permanent Representatives and Heads of Delegation, publicly disclose their meetings with interest groups and lobbyists in a standardised transparency register, similar to the obligations imposed on Members of Parliament and the Commission;’ Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
16. Final vote — text as a whole 13:47 A10-0051/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
12

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union

Committee report by Pasquale Tridico · voted 13:48–13:49

📄 Report A-10-2026-0055 Full procedure 2025/2148
Adopted Adopted

The spending was approved.

Final vote — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 8 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 2 parts of the text voted on separately (2 rejected).

Roll calls requested by ECR, ESN.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 8 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote Proposal for a decision
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Amendment 2 13:48 A10-0055/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – § 5 – Am 2 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
3. Amendment 3 13:48 A10-0055/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – § 41 – Am 3 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
4. Separate vote: after paragraph 55 After § 55
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Separate vote: after paragraph 60 After § 60
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Amendment 1 13:48 A10-0055/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Recital C – Am 1 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
7. Amendment 4 13:48 A10-0055/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Recital C – Am 4 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
8. Final vote — text as a whole 13:49 A10-0055/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
13

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Court of Auditors

Committee report by Pasquale Tridico · voted 13:49–13:52

📄 Report A-10-2026-0052 Full procedure 2025/2149
Adopted Adopted

The spending was approved.

Final vote — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 16 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 adopted) and 12 parts of the text voted on separately (6 adopted, 6 rejected).

Roll call requested by ECR · split votes by S&D (2), Renew, PPE · separate votes by Renew.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 16 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote Proposal for a decision
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Amendment 7 — part 1 13:49 A10-0052/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – After § 15 – Am 7/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘stresses that, in a context of unprecedented growth in Union expenditure, in the volume of borrowing operations and in the complexity of new financial instruments, the Court must be provided with resources that are commensurate with the scale and complexity of its audit mandate;’” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
3. Amendment 7 — part 2 13:49 A10-0052/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – After § 15 – Am 7/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
4. Paragraph 17 — part 1 of 2 § 17 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘financial instruments in cohesion policy, transparency of Union funding granted to NGOs, Union bodies fighting fraud,’” Split vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Paragraph 17 — part 2 of 2 § 17 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Renew
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Separate vote: paragraph 20 § 20
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Paragraph 39 — part 1 of 2 § 39 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘with concerns’” Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Paragraph 39 — part 2 of 2 § 39 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Separate vote: after paragraph 61 After § 61
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Separate vote: paragraph 76 § 76
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
11. Separate vote: paragraph 76 § 76
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
12. Separate vote: paragraph 77 § 77 Split vote requested by S&D · Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
13. Separate vote: paragraph 77 § 77 Split vote requested by S&D · Separate vote requested by Renew
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
14. Separate vote: paragraph 77 § 77 Split vote requested by S&D · Separate vote requested by Renew
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Separate vote: paragraph 77 § 77 Split vote requested by S&D · Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
16. Final vote — text as a whole 13:52 A10-0052/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
14

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action Service

Committee report by Pasquale Tridico · voted 13:53–13:56

📄 Report A-10-2026-0053 Full procedure 2025/2150
Adopted Adopted

The spending was approved.

Final vote — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 27 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 21 parts of the text voted on separately (14 adopted, 7 rejected).

Roll calls requested by ECR, PfE · split votes by Verts/ALE, PfE (3) · separate votes by S&D, Renew, PPE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 27 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote Proposal for a decision
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Separate vote: paragraph 10 § 10 Split vote requested by Verts/ALE · Separate vote requested by S&D
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote: paragraph 10 § 10 Split vote requested by Verts/ALE · Separate vote requested by S&D
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Separate vote: paragraph 10 § 10 Split vote requested by Verts/ALE · Separate vote requested by S&D
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Separate vote: paragraph 25 § 25
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Separate vote: after paragraph 26 After § 26
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Amendment 8 13:53 A10-0053/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – After § 26 – Am 8 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
8. Paragraph 27 — part 1 of 2 § 27 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘“green diplomacy” and’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Paragraph 27 — part 2 of 2 § 27 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Amendment 9 13:53 A10-0053/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – After § 27 – Am 9 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
11. Amendment 10 13:54 A10-0053/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – After § 27 – Am 10 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
12. Separate vote: paragraph 29 § 29 Split vote requested by PfE · Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
13. Separate vote: paragraph 29 § 29 Split vote requested by PfE · Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Separate vote: paragraph 29 § 29 Split vote requested by PfE · Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Separate vote: paragraph 30 § 30 Split vote requested by PfE · Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
16. Separate vote: paragraph 30 § 30 Split vote requested by PfE · Separate vote requested by Renew
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
17. Separate vote: paragraph 30 § 30 Split vote requested by PfE · Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
18. Separate vote: paragraph 31 § 31 Separate vote requested by Renew
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
19. Amendment 1 13:55 A10-0053/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – § 33 – Am 1 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
20. Separate vote: after paragraph 35 After § 35
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
21. Separate vote: paragraph 52 § 52 Separate vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
22. Separate vote: paragraph 53 § 53 Separate vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
23. Separate vote: paragraph 65 § 65
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
24. Separate vote: paragraph 71 § 71 Separate vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
25. Separate vote: paragraph 71 13:56 A10-0053/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – § 71 Separate vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
26. Separate vote: paragraph 73 § 73 Separate vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
27. Final vote — text as a whole 13:56 A10-0053/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
15

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Economic and Social Committee

Committee report by Pasquale Tridico · voted at 13:57

📄 Report A-10-2026-0059 Full procedure 2025/2151
Adopted Adopted

The spending was approved.

Final vote — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 5 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 rejected).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 5 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote Proposal for a decision
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Separate vote: after paragraph 14 After § 14
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote: paragraph 22 § 22
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Separate vote: after paragraph 53 After § 53
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Final vote — text as a whole 13:57 A10-0059/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
16

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Ombudsman

Committee report by Pasquale Tridico · voted at 13:58

📄 Report A-10-2026-0054 Full procedure 2025/2153
Adopted Adopted

The spending was approved.

Final vote — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 2 ballots

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 2 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote Proposal for a decision
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Final vote — text as a whole 13:58 A10-0054/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
17

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – Committee of the Regions

Committee report by Pasquale Tridico · voted at 13:58

📄 Report A-10-2026-0056 Full procedure 2025/2152
Adopted Adopted

The spending was approved.

Final vote — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 4 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 parts of the text voted on separately (2 rejected).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 4 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote Proposal for a decision
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote: after paragraph 57 After § 57
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Final vote — text as a whole 13:58 A10-0056/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
18

Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Data Protection Supervisor

Committee report by Pasquale Tridico · voted at 13:59

📄 Report A-10-2026-0057 Full procedure 2025/2154
Adopted Adopted

The spending was approved.

Final vote — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 4 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 rejected).

Roll calls requested by S&D, ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 4 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote Proposal for a decision
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Amendment 2 13:59 A10-0057/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – After § 20 – Am 2 Roll call requested by ECR, S&D
Rejected
3. Separate vote: after paragraph 23 After § 23
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Final vote — text as a whole 13:59 A10-0057/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
19

Discharge 2024: European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Committee report by Pasquale Tridico · voted 13:59–14:00

📄 Report A-10-2026-0050 Full procedure 2025/2155
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

The spending was approved.

For 454 Against 161 Abstained 29

Final vote — text as a whole at 14:00 · 70% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 9 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 6 parts of the text voted on separately (4 adopted, 2 rejected).

Roll call requested by ECR · split votes by PfE · separate votes by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 9 ballots in voting order
1. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Separate vote: after paragraph 62 After § 62
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Amendment 2 13:59 A10-0050/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – After § 63 – Am 2 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
4. Separate vote: after paragraph 68 After § 68
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Separate vote: paragraph 105 § 105 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Separate vote: paragraph 106 § 106 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Paragraph 107 — part 1 of 2 § 107 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to consider, in the application of the Regulation (EU, EURATOM) 2020/2092 of the European Parliament and of the Council, that non-participation in the EPPO may constitute a potential threat to the Union’s financial interests and’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Paragraph 107 — part 2 of 2 § 107 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Final vote — text as a whole 14:00 A10-0050/2026 – Pasquale Tridico – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
20

Discharge 2024: Agencies

Committee report by Monika Hohlmeier · voted 14:05–14:11

📄 Report A-10-2026-0087 Full procedure 2025/2156
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

The spending was approved.

For 475 Against 107 Abstained 71

Final vote — text as a whole at 14:11 · 73% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR –
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI –

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 86 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 16 amendments (1 adopted, 15 rejected) and 36 parts of the text voted on separately (13 adopted, 23 rejected).

Roll calls requested by ECR, PfE, ESN · split votes by Renew (2), PPE, PfE (2).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 86 ballots in voting order
1. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Proposals for decisions
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
13. Proposals for decisions
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
16. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
17. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
18. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
19. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
21. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
22. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
23. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
24. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
25. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
26. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
27. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
28. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
29. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
30. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
31. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
32. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
33. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
34. Amendment 43 14:05 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – After § 1 – Am 43 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
35. Paragraph 2 — part 1 of 2 § 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and consideration can be given to terminating their mandate if necessary;’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
36. Paragraph 2 — part 2 of 2 § 2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
37. Paragraph 2 — part 2 14:05 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – § 2/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
38. Amendment 25 14:05 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – After § 2 – Am 25 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
39. Separate vote: paragraph 3 § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
40. Amendment 9 14:05 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – § 11 – Am 9 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
41. Separate vote: after paragraph 11 After § 11
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
42. Separate vote: after paragraph 11 After § 11
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
43. Separate vote: after paragraph 11 After § 11
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
44. Amendment 10 14:06 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – § 12 – Am 10 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
45. Separate vote: after paragraph 12 After § 12
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
46. Separate vote: paragraph 13 § 13
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
47. Amendment 26 14:06 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – After § 13 – Am 26 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
48. Amendment 12 14:06 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – § 19 – Am 12 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
49. Amendment 27 14:07 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – After § 19 – Am 27 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
50. Amendment 28 14:07 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – After § 19 – Am 28 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
51. Separate vote: paragraph 20 § 20
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
52. Separate vote: paragraph 21 § 21
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
53. Separate vote: after paragraph 21 After § 21
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
54. Separate vote: after paragraph 21 After § 21
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
55. Amendment 13 14:07 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – § 22 – Am 13 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
56. Amendment 44 14:07 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – § 24 – Am 44 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
57. Separate vote: after paragraph 25 After § 25
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
58. Amendment 45 14:08 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – § 33 – Am 45 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
59. Separate vote: paragraph 33 § 33
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
60. Amendment 46 14:08 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – After § 33 – Am 46 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
61. Amendment 47 14:08 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – After § 33 – Am 47 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
62. Separate vote: after paragraph 43 After § 43
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
63. Amendment 15 14:08 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – After § 43 – Am 15 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
64. Amendment 16 14:08 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – § 48 – Am 16 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
65. Separate vote: paragraph 78 § 78
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
66. Separate vote: paragraph 80 § 80
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
67. Separate vote: paragraph 82 § 82
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
68. Separate vote: paragraph 87, after point vi § 87, after point vi
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
69. Separate vote: paragraph 94 § 94
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
70. Separate vote: paragraph 95 § 95
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
71. Separate vote: paragraph 95 § 95
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
72. Separate vote: paragraph 101, after point iii § 101, after point iii
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
73. Separate vote: paragraph 101, after point iii § 101, after point iii
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
74. Separate vote: paragraph 101, after point iii § 101, after point iii
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
75. Separate vote: paragraph 108 § 108
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
76. Amendment 20 14:10 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – After § 110 – Am 20 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
77. Paragraph 118, point iv — part 1 of 2 § 118, point iv Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘ii) analyse and propose ways to address the causes of these shortages, including manufacturing, supply chain, distribution challenges, and internal market obstacles or national protectionism, including the necessity of production of European medicines’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
78. Paragraph 118, point iv — part 2 of 2 § 118, point iv Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
79. Separate vote: paragraph 122, after indent 3 § 122, after indent 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
80. Separate vote: paragraph 125 § 125
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
81. Separate vote: after paragraph 125 After § 125
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
82. Separate vote: after paragraph 129 After § 129
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
83. Separate vote: after paragraph 140 After § 140
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
84. Separate vote: paragraph 148, point iii § 148, point iii
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
85. Separate vote: paragraph 148, after point iii § 148, after point iii
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
86. Final vote — text as a whole 14:11 A10-0087/2026 – Monika Hohlmeier – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
21

Discharge 2024: Joint Undertakings

Committee report by Csaba Molnár · voted at 14:13

📄 Report A-10-2026-0046 Full procedure 2025/2157
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

The spending was approved.

For 525 Against 104 Abstained 16

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 14:13 · 81% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 13 ballots

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 13 ballots in voting order
1. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Proposals for decisions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
13. Final vote on the motion for a resolution 14:13 A10-0046/2026 – Csaba Molnár – Motion for a resolution
Adopted
22

Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/008 BE/Liberty - Belgium

Committee report by Matthias Ecke · voted at 14:32

📄 Report A-10-2026-0084 Full procedure 2026/0066
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

The spending was approved.

For 586 Against 48 Abstained 16

Final vote — text as a whole at 14:32 · 90% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 2 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 rejected).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 2 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: paragraph 8 § 8
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Final vote — text as a whole 14:32 A10-0084/2026 – Matthias Ecke – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Objections to Commission measures

Parliament can veto technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Adopting an objection blocks the measure; rejecting it lets the measure go ahead.

23

Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

Genetically modified soybean MON 94637

Motion for a resolution · voted at 15:03

📄 Motion B-10-2026-0186 Full procedure 2026/2651
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

The objection passed — the Commission measure is blocked.

For 412 Against 145 Abstained 11

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 15:03 · 73% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✗
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by PPE.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE.

Resolutions & reports

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

24

Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025

Committee report by Anna Strolenberg · voted 14:32–14:52

📄 Report A-10-2026-0042 Full procedure 2025/2135
Adopted Adopted by a clear majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 328 Against 199 Abstained 98

Final vote — text as a whole at 14:52 · 52% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left –
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 125 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 45 amendments (3 adopted, 42 rejected) and 79 parts of the text voted on separately (45 adopted, 34 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, PPE, ECR, PfE, ESN · split votes by The Left, Verts/ALE, PPE (12), ECR, PfE (3) · separate votes by Verts/ALE, ECR, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 125 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 22 14:32 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 1 – Am 22 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
2. Amendment 23 14:33 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 2 – Am 23 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
3. Amendment 39 14:33 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 3 – Am 39 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
4. Amendment 40 14:33 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 4 – Am 40 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
5. Separate vote: after paragraph 5 After § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Amendment 50 14:33 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 5 – Am 50 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
7. Amendment 68 14:33 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 5 – Am 68 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
8. Amendment 51 14:33 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 6 – Am 51 Roll call requested by ESN, S&D
Rejected
9. Separate vote: after paragraph 8 After § 8
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Separate vote: paragraph 9 14:34 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 9 Separate vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
11. Amendment 52 14:34 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 10 – Am 52 Roll call requested by ESN, S&D
Rejected
12. Amendment 61 14:34 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 10 – Am 61 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
13. Amendment 25 14:34 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 11 – Am 25 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
14. Amendment 62 14:34 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 12 – Am 62 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
15. Separate vote: paragraph 15 14:35 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 15 – § 26
Rejected
16. Separate vote: after paragraph 15 After § 15
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
17. Amendment 16 — part 1 14:35 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 15 – Am 16/1 Part 1: 'Calls on the Commission to introduce European preventive mechanisms to make access to EU funds conditional on prior checks on the absence of connections to organised crime, extending this approach to all public and private entities that are beneficiaries of EU-financed contracts, concessions and contributions;’ Split vote requested by Verts/ALE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, The Left
Rejected
18. Amendment 16 — part 2 14:35 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 15 – Am 16/2 Part 2: ‘calls for these mechanisms to be incorporated into the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation and the Common Provisions Regulation, so that protecting EU funds from infiltration by criminal organisations becomes a systematic cross-cutting requirement;’ Split vote requested by Verts/ALE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, The Left
Rejected
19. Amendment 27 14:35 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 20 – Am 27 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
20. Amendment 17 14:35 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 21 – Am 17 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
21. Separate vote: after paragraph 21 After § 21
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
22. Amendment 3 14:36 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 26 – Am 3 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
23. Separate vote: paragraph 27 § 27
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
24. Separate vote: paragraph 30 14:36 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 30 – § 28
Rejected
25. Separate vote: paragraph 31 § 31
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
26. Amendment 30 14:36 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 31 – Am 30 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
27. Separate vote: after paragraph 31 After § 31
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
28. Separate vote: after paragraph 31 After § 31
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
29. Amendment 20 14:36 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 33 – Am 20 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
30. Amendment 53 14:37 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 33 – Am 53 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
31. Amendment 63 14:37 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 40 – Am 63 Roll call requested by S&D, ECR
Rejected
32. Amendment 64 14:37 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 40 – Am 64 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
33. Amendment 65 14:37 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 40 – Am 65 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
34. Paragraph 43 — part 1 14:37 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 43/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘on the Member States’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
35. Paragraph 43 — part 2 14:37 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 43/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Adopted
36. Separate vote: paragraph 45 14:38 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 45 – § 32
Rejected
37. Amendment 54 14:38 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 45 – Am 54 Roll call requested by ESN, S&D
Rejected
38. Separate vote: paragraph 46 14:38 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 46 – § 4
Rejected
39. Paragraph 47 — part 1 14:38 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 47/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘in full and in a timely manner; highlights the need to meet the implementation deadline; notes with concern the lack of preparedness by some Member States to meet the implementation deadline, including with regard to’” Split vote requested by The Left · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
40. Paragraph 47 — part 2 14:38 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 47/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by The Left · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
41. Amendment 55 14:38 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 46 – Am 55 Roll call requested by ESN, S&D
Rejected
42. Amendment 69 14:38 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 49 – Am 69 Roll call requested by S&D, ECR
Rejected
43. Paragraph 48 — part 1 14:39 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 48/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including practices involving stopping asylum seekers and forcibly returning them to the country they entered from without carrying out an individual assessment,’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
44. Paragraph 48 — part 2 14:39 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 48/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Rejected
45. Separate vote: paragraph 50 14:39 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 50 – § 33 Separate vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Rejected
46. Separate vote: paragraph 50 14:39 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 50 Separate vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Rejected
47. Amendment 66 14:39 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 51 – Am 66 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
48. Amendment 43 14:40 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 53 – Am 43 Roll call requested by S&D, ECR
Rejected
49. Separate vote: paragraph 54 14:40 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 54 Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
50. Paragraph 56 — part 1 14:40 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 56/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including through the obstruction of legal gender recognition, the erasure of the existence of intersex people, violations of reproductive rights and restrictions on access to essential reproductive healthcare and age-appropriate, comprehensive sexuality education for children;’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
51. Paragraph 56 — part 2 14:40 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 56/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Rejected
52. Separate vote: paragraph 57 14:40 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 57 Separate vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
53. Amendment 56 14:40 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 59 – Am 56 Roll call requested by ESN, S&D
Rejected
54. Separate vote: paragraph 60 14:41 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 60 Separate vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
55. Separate vote: paragraph 61 14:41 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 61 Separate vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
56. Paragraph 64 — part 1 14:41 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 64/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘expresses great concern over the growth of the so-called “manosphere” in the online environment;’ ‘and far-right’ and ‘among boys and young men’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
57. Paragraph 64 — part 2 14:41 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 64/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Rejected
58. Amendment 34 14:41 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 66 – Am 34 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
59. Paragraph 67 — part 1 14:42 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 67/1 Part 1: ‘Urges the Commission and the Member States to take the necessary measures to fight hate speech and hate crime, both offline and online, especially where such conduct can escalate into violence, including gender-based violence; further stresses the importance of putting in place EU legislation to combat hate crimes and hate speech, including on grounds such as gender identity and sexual orientation; encourages the Commission to follow up on the LGBTIQ+ equality strategy 2026-2030;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
60. Paragraph 67 — part 2 14:42 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 67/2 Part 2: ‘welcomes the Commission’s initiative to expand the list of EU crimes under Article 83(1) TFEU to include hate speech and hate crime, highlighting the need to ensure a robust EU criminal law response in this regard;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PfE
Adopted
61. Amendment 57 14:42 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 67 – Am 57 Roll call requested by ESN, S&D
Rejected
62. Separate vote: paragraph 69 14:42 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 69 – § 58 Roll call requested by PPE
Rejected
63. Separate vote: paragraph 69 14:42 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 69 Roll call requested by PPE
Rejected
64. Paragraph 70 — part 1 14:42 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 70/1 Part 1: ‘Emphasises that the lack of, or the denial of, access to SRHR, including safe and legal abortion, is a form of gender-based violence and a violation of human and fundamental rights;’ Split vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Adopted
65. Paragraph 70 — part 2 14:43 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 70/2 Part 2: ‘urges the Commission to actively work towards ensuring broad accessibility to SRHR; reiterates its call for the inclusion of the right to safe and legal abortion in the Charter;’ Split vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Adopted
66. Separate vote: paragraph 71 14:43 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 71 Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
67. Amendment 44 14:43 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 71 – Am 44 Roll call requested by S&D, ECR
Rejected
68. Amendment 5 14:43 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 72 – Am 5 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
69. Paragraph 74 — part 1 14:43 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 74/1 Part 1: ‘Condemns in the strongest terms the use of rape and other forms of sexual violence as a weapon of war, and recalls that such conduct can amount to war crimes or crimes against humanity under international law; urges the strengthening of international efforts to document these crimes’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
70. Paragraph 74 — part 2 14:44 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 74/2 Part 2: ‘and emphasises the importance of ensuring access to safe and legal abortion for victims of sexual violence, including victims of rape in the context of war;’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Adopted
71. Amendment 6 14:44 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 86 – Am 6 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
72. Amendment 7 14:44 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 87 – Am 7 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
73. Amendment 8 14:44 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 87 – Am 8 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
74. Separate vote: paragraph 92 14:44 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 92 Separate vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
75. Separate vote: paragraph 96 14:44 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 96 Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
76. Paragraph 101 — part 1 14:45 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 101/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘regardless of their nationality, place of birth or residence status,’ ‘the Commission to support’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
77. Paragraph 101 — part 2 14:45 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 101/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Rejected
78. Amendment 46 14:45 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 105 – Am 46 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
79. Separate vote: after paragraph 106 After § 106
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
80. Separate vote: after paragraph 106 After § 106
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
81. Separate vote: after paragraph 106 After § 106
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
82. Separate vote: after paragraph 106 After § 106
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
83. Separate vote: after paragraph 107 After § 107
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
84. Paragraph 108 — part 1 14:45 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 108/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including Islamophobia,’” Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
85. Paragraph 108 — part 2 14:46 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 108/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PfE
Adopted
86. Separate vote: paragraph 122 14:46 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – § 122 – § 59
Rejected
87. Amendment 60 14:46 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After § 122 – Am 60 Roll call requested by ESN, S&D
Rejected
88. Separate vote: citation 17 14:46 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 17 Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
89. Separate vote: citation 27 14:46 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 27 Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
90. Separate vote: citation 28 14:46 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 28 Roll call requested by ESN, PPE
Rejected
91. Citation 44 — part 1 14:47 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 44/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including Greece, Hungary and Slovakia’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
92. Citation 44 — part 2 14:47 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 44/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Rejected
93. Separate vote: citation 45 14:47 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Citation 45 Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
94. Separate vote: after citation 51 After citation 51
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
95. Separate vote: after recital G After recital G
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
96. Amendment 10 14:47 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After recital G – Am 10 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
97. Amendment 67 14:47 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital H – Am 67 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
98. Amendment 11 14:48 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After recital L – Am 11 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
99. Separate vote: after recital L After recital L
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
100. Amendment 13 14:48 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital M – Am 13 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
101. Separate vote: recital O Recital O
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
102. Amendment 47 14:48 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After recital P – Am 47 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
103. Amendment 48 14:48 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital S – Am 48 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
104. Recital W — part 1 14:48 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital W/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘in several Member States’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
105. Recital W — part 2 14:49 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital W/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Adopted
106. Separate vote: recital AC 14:49 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AC Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
107. Amendment 49 14:49 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AG – Am 49 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
108. Recital AJ — part 1 14:49 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AJ/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘of the so-called “manosphere”’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
109. Recital AJ — part 2 14:49 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AJ/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by PPE
Rejected
110. Separate vote: recital AL 14:50 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AL Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
111. Separate vote: recital AO 14:50 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AO Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
112. Recital AP — part 1 14:50 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AP/1 Part 1: ‘whereas total annual anti-gender funding in Europe rose from USD 220 million in 2019 to USD 271 million in 2023, which represents a 23 % increase; whereas a significant portion of the funding driving the growth of anti-gender movements across the EU comes from foreign actors;’ Split vote requested by PPE · Separate vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
113. Recital AP — part 2 14:50 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AP/2 Part 2: 'whereas the rise of anti-gender and anti-rights movements in the past few years is a result of coordinated transnational efforts with regard to organisation, fundraising and mobilisation; whereas research shows that these movements benefit from funding from a broad range of actors from the far-right of the political spectrum;’ Split vote requested by PPE · Separate vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Rejected
114. Separate vote: recital AQ 14:50 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AQ Separate vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
115. Recital AZ — part 1 14:50 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AZ/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas these attempts focus mostly on the area of reproductive healthcare and rights, gender identity and legal gender recognition or access to comprehensive sexuality education;’” Split vote requested by PPE · Separate vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
116. Recital AZ — part 2 14:51 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital AZ/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Separate vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Adopted
117. Recital BB — part 1 14:51 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BB/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘, or the way the child was conceived’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
118. Recital BB — part 2 14:51 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BB/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, PPE
Adopted
119. Recital BC — part 1 14:51 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BC/1 Part 1: 'whereas concerns have been raised regarding the fact that discrimination and racism remain widespread across the EU, including in laws and policies, as well as in public institutions such as law enforcement and the justice system; whereas discriminatory law enforcement practices remain a serious concern; whereas racialised groups are disproportionately targeted by stop-and-search procedures, excessive use of force and harassment; whereas oversight and accountability mechanisms remain weak and are hindered by a lack of independent investigations;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
120. Recital BC — part 2 14:51 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BC/2 Part 2: ‘whereas, at the same time, violence against public officials must be effectively addressed;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
121. Separate vote: recital BE Recital BE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
122. Amendment 2 14:52 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – After recital BE – Am 2 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
123. Separate vote: recital BM 14:52 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BM Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
124. Separate vote: recital BV 14:52 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Recital BV Separate vote requested by Verts/ALE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, The Left
Adopted
125. Final vote — text as a whole 14:52 A10-0042/2026 – Anna Strolenberg – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
25

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Committee report by Konstantinos Arvanitis · voted 14:53–14:58

📄 Report A-10-2026-0091 Full procedure 2025/2239
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 387 Against 191 Abstained 46

Final vote — text as a whole at 14:58 · 62% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 32 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 20 amendments (1 adopted, 19 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (10 adopted, 1 rejected).

Roll calls requested by S&D, PPE, ECR, PfE · split votes by S&D (2), PPE, ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 32 ballots in voting order
1. Paragraph 5 — part 1 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 5/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘elected by their peers,’” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
2. Paragraph 5 — part 2 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 5/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
3. Amendment 18 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 10 – Am 18 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
4. Amendment 1 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 13 – Am 1 Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
5. Paragraph 15 — part 1 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 15/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘elected by their peers,’” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
6. Paragraph 15 — part 2 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 15/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
7. Amendment 19 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 34 – Am 19 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
8. Amendment 15 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 38 – Am 15 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
9. Amendment 16 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 44 – Am 16 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
10. Amendment 17 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 55 – Am 17 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
11. Amendment 2 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 65 – Am 2 Roll call requested by S&D, ECR
Rejected
12. Amendment 3 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 77 – Am 3 Roll call requested by S&D, ECR
Rejected
13. Amendment 4 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 86 – Am 4 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
14. Amendment 5 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 91 – Am 5 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
15. Separate vote: paragraph 100 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 100 Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
16. Separate vote: paragraph 101 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 101 Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
17. Separate vote: paragraph 102 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 102 Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
18. Amendment 6 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 103 – Am 6 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
19. Amendment 7 14:56 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112 – Am 7 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
20. Paragraph 112 — part 1 14:56 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/1 Part 1: ‘Reiterates the obligation of Member States to respect EU and international law in the field of migration and asylum on land and at sea;’ Split vote requested by ECR, PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
21. Paragraph 112 — part 2 14:56 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/2 Part 2: ‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that migration and asylum policies, including the Pact on Migration and Asylum, are implemented in full compliance with the Charter, the principle of non-refoulment and the principle of responsibility-sharing to ensure that people’s rights to asylum and international protection are upheld;’ Split vote requested by ECR, PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
22. Paragraph 112 — part 3 14:56 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/3 Part 3: ‘reiterates that practices such as stopping asylum seekers and forcibly returning them to the country they entered from without carrying out an individual assessment, arbitrary detention and obstruction of humanitarian aid are contrary to EU and international law;’ Split vote requested by ECR, PPE · Roll call requested by PPE, S&D
Rejected
23. Amendment 8 14:56 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 113 – Am 8 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
24. Amendment 9 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 116 – Am 9 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
25. Separate vote: paragraph 117 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 117 Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
26. Amendment 20 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 118 – Am 20 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
27. Amendment 10 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 126 – Am 10 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
28. Amendment 13 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 155 – Am 13 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
29. Amendment 11 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 168 – Am 11 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
30. Amendment 12 14:58 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 185 – Am 12 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
31. Amendment 14 14:58 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – Recital R – Am 14 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
32. Final vote — text as a whole 14:58 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
26

Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025

Committee report by Dainius Žalimas · voted 14:59–15:02

📄 Report A-10-2026-0037 Full procedure 2025/2016
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 416 Against 190 Abstained 15

Final vote — text as a whole at 15:02 · 67% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 33 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 12 amendments (12 rejected) and 20 parts of the text voted on separately (5 adopted, 15 rejected).

Roll calls requested by ECR, PfE, ESN · split votes by PfE · separate votes by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 33 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: after paragraph 1 After § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Separate vote: paragraph 2 § 2 Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote: paragraph 2 § 2 Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Separate vote: paragraph 2 § 2 Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Paragraph 2 — part 2 14:59 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – § 2/2 Part 2: ‘notes with concern that national constitutional and supreme courts in some Member States have been undermining the well-established doctrine of the primacy of EU law; stresses that such developments should always lead to swift enforcement activities by the Commission, including infringement procedures;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
6. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Separate vote: paragraph 3 § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Amendment 7 14:59 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – After § 6 – Am 7 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
11. Separate vote: after paragraph 9 After § 9
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
12. Amendment 12 14:59 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – After § 12 – Am 12 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
13. Amendment 22 14:59 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – § 17 – Am 22D Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
14. Amendment 8 15:00 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – After § 17 – Am 8 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
15. Separate vote: paragraph 18 § 18
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
16. Amendment 24 15:00 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – § 19 – Am 24D Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
17. Separate vote: after paragraph 20 After § 20
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
18. Separate vote: paragraph 21 § 21
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
19. Amendment 25 15:00 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – After § 22 – Am 25 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
20. Separate vote: paragraph 23 § 23
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
21. Separate vote: paragraph 23 § 23
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
22. Amendment 13 15:00 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – After § 31 – Am 13 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
23. Separate vote: paragraph 36 § 36
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
24. Amendment 14 15:01 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – § 36 – Am 14 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
25. Separate vote: paragraph 36 § 36
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
26. Amendment 28 15:01 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – After § 36 – Am 28 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
27. Amendment 29 15:01 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – After § 36 – Am 29 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
28. Separate vote: paragraph 47 § 47
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
29. Separate vote: paragraph 48 § 48 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
30. Amendment 11 15:01 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – After § 48 – Am 11 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
31. Amendment 6 15:01 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – After recital D – Am 6 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
32. Separate vote: after recital F After recital F
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
33. Final vote — text as a whole 15:02 A10-0037/2026 – Dainius Žalimas – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
27

Protection of EU companies, jobs and products against unfair competition from third countries

Motion for a resolution

📄 Motion B-10-2026-0185 Full procedure 2025/2955
Adopted Adopted

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Final vote on the motion for a resolution — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.