Skip to content
1 New EU laws ·decision 1 of 27 on Wednesday, 29 April 2026

Simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products

Committee report by Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller · · voted 14:16–14:21

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 540 for · 60 against · 45 abstained (84 % in favour) Climate & environmentEconomy & single marketSimplification & red tapeSingle market rulesPollution & chemicalsConsumer rights

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 540 Against 60 Abstained 45

Final vote at 14:21 · 84% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN –
  • NI ✓

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by The Left; ESN mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its position on a proposal to simplify requirements and procedures for chemical products, amending rules on classification, labelling and packaging, cosmetics, and fertilising products. The adopted text aims to reduce administrative burdens while maintaining high protection levels, for example by making labelling rules more flexible and streamlining approval procedures for cosmetic ingredients. Parliament calls on the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends the proposal, and forwards its position to the Council, the Commission and national parliaments.

How the vote unfolded · 37 ballots

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 13 amendments (13 rejected) and 20 parts of the text voted on separately (7 adopted, 10 rejected, 3 lapsed). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 37 ballots in voting order
1. Proposal to reject the text 14:16 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Proposal for rejection – Am 90
Rejected
2. Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 1, point 2
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 1, point 2
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 1, point 4
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 1, point 4
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 1, point 5
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 1, point 5
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 1, point 6
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
11. Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 1, point 6
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Amendment 116 to Article 2, before paragraph 1 14:17 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, before § 1 – Am 116 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
13. Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
14. Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
15. Amendment 117 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i 14:17 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point a, point i – Am 117 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
16. Amendment 104 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a, point i 14:17 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point a, point i – Am 104 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
17. Amendment 95 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point a 14:17 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point a – Am 95 requested by The Left
Rejected
18. Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Amendment 96 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b 14:18 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b – Am 96 requested by The Left
Rejected
21. Amendment 105 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b 14:18 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b – Am 105 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
22. Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
23. Amendment 97 to Article 2, paragraph 1, point 2, point b 14:18 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, point 2, point b – Am 97 requested by The Left
Rejected
24. Amendment 101 to Article 2, paragraph 1, after point 2 14:19 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Article 2, § 1, after point 2 – Am 101 requested by Verts/ALE, The Left
Rejected
25. Separate vote on recital 2
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
26. Amendment 98, adding text after recital 2 14:19 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – After recital 2 – Am 98 requested by PfE
Rejected
27. Amendment 91, adding text after recital 15 14:19 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – After recital 15 – Am 91 requested by The Left
Rejected
28. Amendment 92, adding text after recital 15 14:19 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – After recital 15 – Am 92 requested by The Left
Rejected
29. Vote on text inserted after recital 15
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
30. Amendment 93 to recital 22 14:20 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Recital 22 – Am 93 requested by The Left
Rejected
31. Separate vote on recital 22
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
32. Separate vote on recital 22
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
33. Separate vote on recital 22
— no individual positions recorded
34. Amendments 114 + 100 (voted as one), adding text after recital 22 14:20 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – After recital 22 – Am 114= 100= requested by The Left
Rejected
35. Vote on text inserted after recital 22
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
36. Final vote 14:21 A10-0104/2026 – Dimitris Tsiodras, Piotr Müller – Commission proposal
Adopted
37. Referral back to committee Request for referral back to committee
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 29 April 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0104 in procedure 2025/0531.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site