← 29 April 18 May →

Plenary sitting, Thursday, 30 April 2026

MEPs decided on 13 subjects between 13:07 and 13:38 — 13 adopted. That took 220 ballots, 68 of them by roll call with every MEP’s position recorded.

13
subjects decided
13 / 0
adopted / rejected
220
ballots, incl. 39 amendments
68
roll calls (per-MEP record)
Tightest result of the day: Banking Union – annual report 2025 — Adopted 376–187
New here? How plenary voting works and how to read this page

A sitting is one day of voting in the Parliament’s plenary. Everything voted that day is listed here by subject — a report, resolution, agreement or objection the Parliament is deciding on. Subjects are sorted into sections by what kind of decision they are (new laws, international agreements, non-binding resolutions, …); each section explains what “adopted” means there.

Each subject can involve many ballots. MEPs first vote on amendments (proposed changes) and on parts of the text a group asked to vote on separately, then hold the decisive vote on the whole text — that is the result shown at the top of every subject. The strip of squares and circles under it shows all the ballots in the order they were taken; open the list to see each one.

Only roll-call votes record how each MEP voted — click one to see every individual position and the full breakdown by political group. The row of group badges (✓ mostly for, ✗ mostly against, – mostly abstained, ~ split) shows which groups backed a result. Votes by show of hands record only the outcome.

Every subject is based on a document (a committee report, a motion for a resolution, or a Council/Commission text) and belongs to a procedure — the full legislative file that can span years. The buttons on each subject take you to both.

Glossary: Am 27 = amendment 27 · § 5 = paragraph 5 · part 1/2 = a paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts (a split vote) · separate vote = a paragraph voted on its own, usually so a group can vote against it · = joins identical amendments voted together · 1st reading (***I) = Parliament’s first pass at a proposed law · Lapsed = fell away without a vote because an earlier vote settled the matter.

International agreements & consent

Treaties and agreements Parliament can only approve or refuse as a whole — no amendments are possible.

Resolutions & reports

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

2

Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:07–13:08

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 511 Against 21 Abstained 42

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:08 · 89% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI ~

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; ESN mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 19 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (3 rejected) and 8 parts of the text voted on separately (2 adopted, 6 rejected). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, PfE, ESN · split votes by ECR, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 19 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: after paragraph 3 After § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Amendment 8 13:07 RC-B10-0209/2026 – After § 5 – Am 8 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
3. Separate vote: paragraph 6 § 6 Split vote requested by ECR, PfE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Amendment 3 13:07 RC-B10-0209/2026 – § 6 – Am 3 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
5. Separate vote: paragraph 6 § 6 Split vote requested by ECR, PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Separate vote: paragraph 6 § 6 Split vote requested by ECR, PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Paragraph 6 — part 2 13:08 RC-B10-0209/2026 – § 6/2 Part 2: ‘urges host countries to halt deportations to Haiti;’ Split vote requested by ECR, PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
8. Amendment 4 13:08 RC-B10-0209/2026 – After recital B – Am 4 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
9. Separate vote: after recital D After recital D
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Separate vote: after recital F After recital F
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
11. Separate vote: after recital F After recital F
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
12. Final vote — text as a whole 13:08 RC-B10-0209/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
13. Alternative motion B10-0209/2026 B10-0209/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
14. Alternative motion B10-0210/2026 B10-0210/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
15. Alternative motion B10-0220/2026 B10-0220/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
16. Alternative motion B10-0222/2026 B10-0222/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
17. Alternative motion B10-0225/2026 B10-0225/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
18. Alternative motion B10-0228/2026 B10-0228/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
19. Alternative motion B10-0230/2026 B10-0230/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
3

New Chinese law on ‘ethnic unity and progress’ and the intensified suppression of ethnic identities

Motion for a resolution · voted at 13:09

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 439 Against 52 Abstained 71

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:09 · 78% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; PfE and ESN mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 9 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll call requested by Renew.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 9 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Amendment 1 13:09 RC-B10-0216/2026 – § 4 – Am 1 Roll call requested by Renew
Rejected
3. Final vote — text as a whole 13:09 RC-B10-0216/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
4. Alternative motion B10-0214/2026 B10-0214/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5. Alternative motion B10-0216/2026 B10-0216/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
6. Alternative motion B10-0223/2026 B10-0223/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
7. Alternative motion B10-0232/2026 B10-0232/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
8. Alternative motion B10-0233/2026 B10-0233/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
9. Alternative motion B10-0234/2026 B10-0234/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
4

Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:10–13:11

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 507 Against 31 Abstained 35

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:11 · 88% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left.

How the vote unfolded · 21 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (3 rejected) and 9 parts of the text voted on separately (2 adopted, 7 rejected). 8 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, PPE · split votes by ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 21 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: after paragraph 1 After § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Amendment 6 13:10 RC-B10-0217/2026 – § 2 – Am 6 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
3. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Amendment 8 13:10 RC-B10-0217/2026 – § 4 – Am 8 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
5. Separate vote: paragraph 4 § 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Separate vote: paragraph 4 § 4
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Amendment 2 13:10 RC-B10-0217/2026 – § 5 – Am 2 Roll call requested by PPE
Rejected
8. Separate vote: after paragraph 5 After § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Separate vote: recital A Recital A Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Separate vote: recital A Recital A Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
11. Separate vote: recital A Recital A Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Separate vote: recital A Recital A Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
13. Final vote — text as a whole 13:11 RC-B10-0217/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew, PPE
Adopted
14. Alternative motion B10-0217/2026 B10-0217/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
15. Alternative motion B10-0218/2026 B10-0218/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
16. Alternative motion B10-0219/2026 B10-0219/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
17. Alternative motion B10-0221/2026 B10-0221/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
18. Alternative motion B10-0224/2026 B10-0224/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
19. Alternative motion B10-0226/2026 B10-0226/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
20. Alternative motion B10-0229/2026 B10-0229/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
21. Alternative motion B10-0231/2026 B10-0231/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5

Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2027 – Section I – European Parliament

Committee report by Michalis Hadjipantela · voted 13:14–13:20

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 401 Against 116 Abstained 68

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:20 · 69% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by PfE and ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 32 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 12 amendments (4 adopted, 8 rejected) and 19 parts of the text voted on separately (14 adopted, 5 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, PfE, Members · split votes by S&D, PfE (4) · separate votes by PPE, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 32 ballots in voting order
1. Paragraph 1 — part 1 of 2 § 1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘already very low’ and ‘regrets the Council’s opposition to the Commission’s proposal to increase the ceiling of Heading 7 in the MFF revision as from 2024’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Paragraph 1 — part 2 of 2 § 1 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Amendment 3 13:14 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – After § 3 – Am 3 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
4. Amendment 4 13:14 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – After § 3 – Am 4 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
5. Separate vote: after paragraph 3 After § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 2 § 4 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘welcomes that an exceptional direct aid is foreseen from 2027 onwards for each trainee based in Luxembourg (up to EUR 500 per month of traineeship) to help them cope with rising housing costs;’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Paragraph 4 — part 2 of 2 § 4 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Separate vote: after paragraph 4 After § 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Separate vote: paragraph 8 § 8
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Amendment 9 13:14 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – After § 8 – Am 9 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
11. Amendment 14 13:14 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – After § 10 – Am 14/rev Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
12. Amendment 10 13:15 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – § 16 – Am 10 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
13. Separate vote: paragraph 16 § 16 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Separate vote: paragraph 17 § 17 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
15. Separate vote: paragraph 17 § 17 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
16. Separate vote: paragraph 18 § 18 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
17. Separate vote: after paragraph 18 After § 18
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
18. Separate vote: paragraph 20 § 20 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
19. Separate vote: paragraph 21 § 21 Separate vote requested by PfE, PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Separate vote: paragraph 22 § 22 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
21. Separate vote: paragraph 23 § 23 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
22. Amendment 13 13:18 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – § 25 – Am 13 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
23. Separate vote: paragraph 27 § 27 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
24. Amendment 15 — part 1 13:18 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – After § 27 - Am 15/1 Part 1: ‘Welcomes the recent initiatives endorsed by the Conference of Presidents and the Bureau to allow Members in the perinatal period to vote by proxy, recognising this as a positive step towards greater inclusiveness in parliamentary work and calls on all parties to swiftly implement the measure;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
25. Amendment 15 — part 2 13:19 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – After § 27 - Am 15/2 Part 2: ‘insists, however, that the measure falls short of Parliament’s repeated calls to ensure voting rights not just for Members in the perinatal period, but also for Members on parental or paternity leave or facing certified long-term illness;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
26. Amendment 1 — part 1 13:19 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – § 28 – Am 1/1 Part 1: ‘Expresses concern that the quality and continuity of services provided by Parliament’s Wayenberg Crèche have been affected by frequent changes of service providers since 2020, alongside challenges related to staff shortages, high staff absenteeism and staff turnover at the crèche; takes note of the award of the current contract for Parliament’s childcare services in Brussels to a new company established shortly after the publication of the tender and reportedly linked to the former provider, Esedra; recalls the early termination by the Parliament of the contract with the previous provider of the Crèche Wayenberg, Esedra after a number of serious allegations against that contractor; reiterates that decent working conditions and adequate pay for external staff, including training, skills development, measures against violence and harassment, meaningful social dialogue and investment in staff wellbeing should, where relevant, be a priority consideration in public procurement of Parliament as a matter of principle; calls for an independent external audit of the tender procedure and of the implementation of the current contract, including an independent external assessment of working conditions and staff wellbeing;’ Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
27. Amendment 1 — part 2 13:19 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – § 28 – Am 1/2 Part 2: ‘calls on the Bureau and the Secretary-General to reconsider the current outsourcing model for childcare services and to carry out a cost-benefit analysis of implementing the progressive internalisation of staff for pre-school childcare services, with a view to ensuring high-quality standards and long-term continuity of care.’ Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
28. Paragraph 30 — part 1 of 2 § 30 Part 1: ‘Reaffirms its call for the Secretary-General to emphasise the fundamental principle that all recruitments should be based on competency’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
29. Paragraph 30 — part 2 of 2 § 30 Part 2: ‘while also ensuring geographical balance among all Member States at every staff level;’ underscores that achieving fair geographical representation at all levels of the administration, also taking into account age and gender, is essential to fostering a genuinely European public service; notes that Parliament has taken measures to support this objective, including the organisation of nationality-specific competitions; highlights the need to accelerate the competitions’ processes while maintaining a strict merit-based selection approach;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
30. Amendment 2 13:19 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – After § 28 – Am 2 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
31. Amendment 7 13:19 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – After § 32 – Am 7 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
32. Final vote — text as a whole 13:20 A10-0124/2026 – Michalis Hadjipantela – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
6

Financial literacy and the rise of finfluencers in the context of the savings and investments union

Committee report by Lídia Pereira · voted at 13:20

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 502 Against 46 Abstained 42

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 13:20 · 85% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

7

How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?

Committee report by Carlo Fidanza · voted 13:21–13:25

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 426 Against 119 Abstained 40

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:25 · 73% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left and Verts/ALE.

How the vote unfolded · 38 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 8 amendments (1 adopted, 7 rejected) and 29 parts of the text voted on separately (28 adopted, 1 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE · split votes by Members (11) · separate votes by Members.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 38 ballots in voting order
1. Paragraph 2 — part 1 of 2 § 2 Part 1: ‘Expresses its concern over initiatives or legislative proposals that, through direct or indirect measures, act as a disincentive to livestock farming;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Paragraph 2 — part 2 of 2 § 2 Part 2: ‘insists that the livestock sector should not be brought under a regulatory regime designed for heavy industries;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Separate vote: paragraph 10 § 10 Separate vote requested by Members
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Paragraph 11 — part 1 of 2 § 11 Part 1: ‘Notes that maintaining a thriving, sustainable and resilient livestock sector in the EU will benefit global food security, strengthen the EU’s food sovereignty and economic growth and contribute to balanced and diverse European diets’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Paragraph 11 — part 2 of 2 § 11 Part 2: ‘through the consumption of animal-based products of high nutritional quality that are a unique source of several micronutrients and bioactive compounds, the nutritional value of which cannot be adequately replaced by plant or artificial alternatives and should be acknowledged when drafting evidence-based dietary guidelines;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Amendment 1 13:21 A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 11 – Am 1 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
7. Paragraph 12 — part 1 of 2 § 12 Part 1: ‘Notes that the FAO’s 2023 report entitled “Contribution of terrestrial animal source foods to healthy diets for improved nutrition and health outcomes” highlights the role of animal-based foods in providing high-quality protein and essential micronutrients that may be lacking in plant-based diets;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Paragraph 12 — part 2 of 2 § 12 Part 2: ‘stresses that these foods are vital for children, teenagers, pregnant and lactating women, women of reproductive age, older people, and people living with chronic diseases, and that they could be difficult to replace with plant-based alternatives;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Amendment 2 13:21 A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 15 – Am 2 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
10. Amendment 3 13:22 A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 18 – Am 3 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
11. Amendment 4 13:22 A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 27 – Am 4 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
12. Amendment 5 13:22 A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 37 – Am 5 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
13. Amendment 6 13:22 A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 37 – Am 6 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
14. Amendment 7 13:22 A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 39 – Am 7 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
15. Paragraph 43 — part 1 of 2 § 43 Part 1: ‘Welcomes the Commission’s presentation of the EU bioeconomy strategy; invites the Commission to recognise the role of innovative livestock farming in promoting circularity and to fully unlock the potential of energy production, particularly biogas and biomethane, the use of digestate as a bio-based fertiliser and the valorisation of livestock by-products through the rendering sector to provide additional sources of income for livestock farmers;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
16. Paragraph 43 — part 2 of 2 § 43 Part 2: ‘underlines that livestock dense areas in particular play an important role in the bioeconomy, as their proximity to urban areas and short distances enable circular cooperation in upscaling human waste streams and the processing of farm waste streams;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
17. Amendment 8 13:23 A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – After § 46 – Am 8 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
18. Paragraph 52 — part 1 of 2 § 52 Part 1: ‘Welcomes the Commission’s proposal for a targeted revision of the Nitrates Directive to allow the use of RENURE fertilisers above the limit set for the application of manure and to align it with the latest scientific evidence and innovative fertilisation practices, including the use of manure so as to promote circular nutrient management while continuing to protect water quality;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
19. Paragraph 52 — part 2 of 2 § 52 Part 2: ‘refers to recent studies on the benefits and neutral impact on water quality of derogations given to Member States;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Paragraph 63 — part 1 of 3 § 63 Part 1: ‘Underlines the importance of transparent, accessible and evidence-based scientific communication to counteract misinformation and ideological bias in public debates on livestock and meat production and consumption;’ without the words ‘to counteract misinformation and ideological bias in public debates’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
21. Paragraph 63 — part 2 of 3 § 63 Part 2: ‘to counteract misinformation and ideological bias in public debates’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
22. Paragraph 63 — part 3 of 3 § 63 Part 3: ‘points out, in this regard, that the World Health Organization encourages the consumption of animal proteins as part of a complete and balanced diet;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
23. Separate vote: paragraph 65 § 65
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
24. Separate vote: paragraph 65 § 65
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
25. Paragraph 66 — part 1 of 3 § 66 Part 1: ‘Urges policymakers at all levels to uphold evidence-based standards in the development of dietary guidelines, fully recognising the nutritional, cultural and economic importance of meat, dairy and eggs,’ without the word ‘cultural’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
26. Paragraph 66 — part 2 of 3 § 66 Part 2: ‘cultural’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
27. Paragraph 66 — part 3 of 3 § 66 Part 3: ‘while also taking into account the affordability and actual protein intake provided by animal products in different regions;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
28. Paragraph 68 — part 1 of 3 § 68 Part 1: ‘Calls on the Commission to work with scientists to present studies on the effects of food substitutes;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
29. Paragraph 68 — part 2 of 3 § 68 Part 2: ‘warns against the uncritical promotion of nutritionally and environmentally inadequate food substitutes as replacements for traditional animal-sourced foods, including those that do not provide the same bioactive compounds or essential micronutrients found in natural meat from healthy animals reared in high-quality systems, and especially warns against their inclusion in food baskets for children and young people in schools;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
30. Paragraph 68 — part 3 of 3 § 68 Part 3: ‘notes that traditional animal-sourced foods, together with plant-based foods, can contribute to a balanced and nutritious diet;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
31. Paragraph 70 — part 1 of 3 § 70 Part 1: ‘Expresses deep concern about the increasing drive to promote synthetic foods, such as lab-grown proteins, without there being conclusive scientific evidence regarding their safety, industrial viability and environmental benefits;’ Split vote requested by Members
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
32. Paragraph 70 — part 2 of 3 § 70 Part 2: ‘underlines the need to conduct proper impact assessments based on scientific evidence, taking into account all aspects related to safety, environmental impact, market implications and consumer protection before proposing any new regulatory framework for emerging food technologies,’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
33. Paragraph 70 — part 3 of 3 § 70 Part 3: ‘in particular through clear and appropriate labelling;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
34. Paragraph 71 — part 1 of 2 § 71 Part 1: ‘Emphasises the ecological role of ruminants and the nutritional value of natural meat, and stresses that synthetic food production is greatly dependent on highly industrialised, energy-intensive processes that require significant levels of chemical inputs, which is at odds with the principles of sustainability advocated by the EU; points out that, to date, synthetic food has neither been a viable solution nor a safe alternative to traditional agriculture and livestock production, and that its promotion could endanger thousands of family farms;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
35. Paragraph 71 — part 2 of 2 § 71 Part 2: ‘calls on the Commission to undertake rigorous and independent assessments of synthetic food products as regards health, environmental and socioeconomic impacts, together with consumer protection concerns and impacts on traditional agriculture and livestock production; calls for the existing regulatory frameworks to be clearly focused on protecting consumers, European producers and rural areas;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
36. Separate vote: paragraph 99 § 99 Separate vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
37. Separate vote: after paragraph 107 After § 107
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
38. Final vote — text as a whole 13:25 A10-0088/2026 – Carlo Fidanza – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
8

Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regions

Committee report by Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska · voted at 13:27

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 404 Against 102 Abstained 67

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:27 · 71% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI ~

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 12 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 11 parts of the text voted on separately (8 adopted, 3 rejected).

split votes by Members (4) · separate votes by Members.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 12 ballots in voting order
1. Paragraph 10 — part 1 of 2 § 10 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘stresses that gender budgeting enables the identification and correction of funding gaps that disadvantage women entrepreneurs, particularly in rural, island and outermost regions;’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Paragraph 10 — part 2 of 2 § 10 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Paragraph 34 — part 1 of 2 § 34 Part 1: ‘Recalls that, in its special report no 10/21 on gender mainstreaming in the EU budget, the European Court of Auditors found that the Commission had not adequately implemented gender mainstreaming and had made insufficient use of sex-disaggregated data and indicators; highlights, in particular, that the European Court of Auditors regretted that the CAP direct payments system left “no scope for positive action regarding women” and noted that there was “a clear need for a gender analysis of income support paid to farmers through direct payments, including income distribution and its relation with land ownership, eligible land, and recipients of payments”; notes that, as women’s farms are on average smaller than men’s, a surface-based direct payment system necessarily disadvantages women farmers; is deeply concerned that next to no improvements have been made in this regard, neither in the current CAP, nor in the draft published on 16 July 2025;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Paragraph 34 — part 2 of 2 § 34 Part 2: ‘calls on the Commission to implement gender-responsive budgeting across all of its programmes to ensure women and men benefit equally from public spending, including under the CAP;’ Split vote requested by Members
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Paragraph 70 — part 1 of 2 § 70 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘rights and’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Paragraph 70 — part 2 of 2 § 70 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Separate vote: paragraph 71 § 71
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Separate vote: paragraph 87 § 87 Separate vote requested by Members
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Recital C — part 1 of 3 Recital C Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and rights’ and ‘including access to safe and legal abortion care’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Recital C — part 2 of 3 Recital C Part 2: ‘and rights’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Recital C — part 3 of 3 Recital C Part 3: ‘including access to safe and legal abortion care’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Final vote — text as a whole 13:27 A10-0058/2026 – Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
9

Banking Union – annual report 2025

Committee report by Evelyn Regner · voted 13:29–13:30

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 376 Against 187 Abstained 17

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:30 · 65% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 7 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 5 parts of the text voted on separately (4 adopted, 1 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, S&D · split votes by PPE (2).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 7 ballots in voting order
1. Paragraph 4 — part 1 13:29 A10-0079/2026 – Evelyn Regner – § 4/1 Part 1: ‘Emphasises the banking sector’s role in financing the twin transition; highlights the simplification efforts under the EU’s sustainable finance framework to ensure coherence, reduce duplication and align obligations across banking, disclosure and risk-management rules;’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
2. Paragraph 4 — part 2 13:29 A10-0079/2026 – Evelyn Regner – § 4/2 Part 2: ‘draws attention to the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority’s recommendation to set higher capital requirements for stranded assets;’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
3. Paragraph 4 — part 3 13:29 A10-0079/2026 – Evelyn Regner – § 4/3 Part 3: ‘calls for stronger supervisory guidance, including through the use of Pillar 2 requirements to align financial institutions with the EU’s climate objectives;’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
4. Paragraph 17 — part 1 13:29 A10-0079/2026 – Evelyn Regner – § 17/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘recalls that the SSM has repeatedly stated that the implementation of the fundamental review of the trading book would strengthen the resilience of EU banks and not undermine their competitiveness;’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
5. Paragraph 17 — part 2 13:29 A10-0079/2026 – Evelyn Regner – § 17/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
6. Amendment 1 13:30 A10-0079/2026 – Evelyn Regner – § 20 – Am 1 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
7. Final vote — text as a whole 13:30 A10-0079/2026 – Evelyn Regner – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
10

Enforcement of the Digital Markets Act

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:30–13:32

Adopted Adopted

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Final vote — text as a whole — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 19 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 amendments (1 adopted, 5 rejected) and 12 parts of the text voted on separately (5 adopted, 7 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, ECR, PfE · split votes by ECR, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 19 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 9 13:30 B10-0190/2026 – § 2 – Am 9 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
2. Separate vote: paragraph 2 § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Amendment 3 13:31 B10-0190/2026 – After § 3 – Am 3 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
6. Separate vote: after paragraph 3 After § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Amendment 7 13:31 B10-0190/2026 – After § 10 – Am 7 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
8. Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 2 § 13 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘further marginalising competing services and reducing consumers’ ability to make independent choices’” Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 2 § 13 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Amendment 6 13:31 B10-0190/2026 – After § 14 – Am 6 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
11. Paragraph 28 — part 1 of 2 § 28 Part 1: ‘Calls on the Commission to ensure sufficient human and financial resources for DMA enforcement, in line with the Regulation’s scope, complexity and strategic importance,’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Paragraph 28 — part 2 of 2 § 28 Part 2: ‘and calls for a significant reinforcement of staffing;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
13. Separate vote: paragraph 29 § 29
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
14. Separate vote: after paragraph 30 After § 30
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Amendment 13 13:32 B10-0190/2026 – After § 30 – Am 13 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
16. Amendment 14 13:32 B10-0190/2026 – After § 30 – Am 14 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
17. Separate vote: after recital J After recital J
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
18. Separate vote: after recital N After recital N
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
19. Final vote — text as a whole Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11

Ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:33–13:35

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 446 Against 63 Abstained 52

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:35 · 80% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 22 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (2 adopted, 2 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (9 adopted, 2 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE · split votes by ECR, PfE (3).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 22 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 5 13:33 RC-B10-0201/2026 – After § 4 – Am 5 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
2. Amendment 1 13:33 RC-B10-0201/2026 – After § 5 – Am 1 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
3. Separate vote: after paragraph 5 After § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Amendment 3 13:33 RC-B10-0201/2026 – After § 5 – Am 3 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
5. Separate vote: after paragraph 5 After § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Separate vote: paragraph 11 § 11 Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Paragraph 11 — part 2 13:33 RC-B10-0201/2026 – § 11/2 Part 2: ‘expresses utmost concern at the US sanctions against the International Criminal Court and its prosecutors, judges and staff, which undermine all its ongoing investigative and prosecutorial work and constitute a serious attack on the international justice system; calls on the Commission to urgently activate the blocking statute and on the Member States to urgently increase their diplomatic efforts to protect and safeguard the International Criminal Court as an indispensable cornerstone of the international justice system;’ Split vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
8. Amendment 4 13:34 RC-B10-0201/2026 – After § 11 – Am 4 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
9. Paragraph 12 — part 1 13:34 RC-B10-0201/2026 – § 12/1 Part 1: ‘Expresses its support for the EU becoming a full member of the International Claims Commission for Ukraine;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
10. Separate vote: paragraph 12 § 12 Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Paragraph 15 — part 1 13:34 RC-B10-0201/2026 – § 15/1 Part 1: ‘Welcomes the Council’s long-awaited approval of an EUR 90 billion EU loan for Ukraine;’ Split vote requested by PfE
Adopted
12. Separate vote: paragraph 15 § 15 Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
13. Paragraph 15 — part 3 13:34 RC-B10-0201/2026 – § 15/3 Part 3: ‘reiterates its call to find legal ways to use the cash balances associated with the Russian sovereign assets immobilised under EU sanctions to support Ukraine’s defence and reconstruction, including through the provision of compensation under the International Claims Commission for Ukraine, and, among other priorities, to fund the restoration of the New Safe Confinement at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant after it was damaged by Russian drone attacks;’ Split vote requested by PfE
Adopted
14. Separate vote: paragraph 22 § 22 Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Paragraph 22 — part 2 13:34 RC-B10-0201/2026 – § 22/2 Part 2: ‘and EU membership;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
16. Final vote — text as a whole 13:35 RC-B10-0201/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew, PPE
Adopted
17. Alternative motion B10-0201/2026 B10-0201/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
18. Alternative motion B10-0202/2026 B10-0202/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
19. Alternative motion B10-0204/2026 B10-0204/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
20. Alternative motion B10-0211/2026 B10-0211/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
21. Alternative motion B10-0215/2026 B10-0215/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
22. Alternative motion B10-0227/2026 B10-0227/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
12

Supporting democratic resilience in Armenia

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:35–13:36

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 476 Against 47 Abstained 48

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:36 · 83% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 19 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (7 adopted, 4 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, PPE, PfE, ESN · split votes by PfE, ESN (2).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 19 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: paragraph 5 § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Separate vote: paragraph 6 § 6 Split vote requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Paragraph 6 — part 2 13:35 RC-B10-0195/2026 – § 6/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by ESN · Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
4. Paragraph 7 — part 1 of 2 § 7 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the eighth European Political Community summit and’ and ‘considers that the consecutive hosting of both summits in Yerevan sends an unambiguous political signal of pan-European solidarity with Armenia and of the EU’s commitment to supporting Armenia’s peace, reform and resilience agenda’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Paragraph 7 — part 2 of 2 § 7 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Separate vote: paragraph 8 § 8 Roll call requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Separate vote: paragraph 8 13:36 RC-B10-0195/2026 – § 8 Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
8. Separate vote: paragraph 12 § 12
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Separate vote: paragraph 14 § 14 Split vote requested by ESN · Roll call requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Paragraph 14 — part 1 13:36 RC-B10-0195/2026 – § 14/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘financial and’” Split vote requested by ESN · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
11. Paragraph 14 — part 2 13:36 RC-B10-0195/2026 – § 14/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by ESN · Roll call requested by PfE, ESN
Adopted
12. Amendment 5 13:36 RC-B10-0195/2026 – After § 15 – Am 5 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
13. Final vote — text as a whole 13:36 RC-B10-0195/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by PPE, Renew
Adopted
14. Alternative motion B10-0195/2026 B10-0195/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
15. Alternative motion B10-0196/2026 B10-0196/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
16. Alternative motion B10-0197/2026 B10-0197/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
17. Alternative motion B10-0198/2026 B10-0198/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
18. Alternative motion B10-0199/2026 B10-0199/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
19. Alternative motion B10-0200/2026 B10-0200/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
13

The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:37–13:38

Adopted Adopted

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Final vote — text as a whole — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 20 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 12 parts of the text voted on separately (10 adopted, 2 rejected). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, PfE · split votes by The Left (2), PfE (2) · separate votes by The Left.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 20 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: paragraph 6 § 6 Separate vote requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Paragraph 7 — part 1 of 2 § 7 Part 1: ‘Invites the Commission to assess the need for a more harmonised approach at EU level to define cyberbullying; invites the Commission to examine whether cyberbullying, including the non-consensual dissemination of intimate material, should be recognised as a particularly serious crime with a cross-border dimension at EU level;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Paragraph 7 — part 2 of 2 § 7 Part 2: ‘reiterates its support for adding hate crime, which could cover the most severe forms of cyberbullying, to the list of EU crimes under Article 83(1) TFEU;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Paragraph 7 — part 2 13:37 RC-B10-0206/2026 – § 7/2 Part 2: ‘reiterates its support for adding hate crime, which could cover the most severe forms of cyberbullying, to the list of EU crimes under Article 83(1) TFEU;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
5. Paragraph 12 — part 1 of 2 § 12 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘certain’” Split vote requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Paragraph 12 — part 2 of 2 § 12 Part 2: “that word” Split vote requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Separate vote: after paragraph 15 After § 15
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Separate vote: paragraph 16 13:37 RC-B10-0206/2026 – § 16 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
9. Separate vote: recital I Recital I Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Recital I — part 2 13:38 RC-B10-0206/2026 – Recital I/2 Part 2: ‘whereas on 9 December 2021, the Commission proposed adding “hate crime” to the list of EU crimes laid down in Article 83(1) TFEU; whereas this proposal did not garner the necessary unanimous support among Member States;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
11. Recital K — part 1 of 2 Recital K Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘certain’” Split vote requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Recital K — part 2 of 2 Recital K Part 2: “that word” Split vote requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
13. Final vote — text as a whole Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Alternative motion B10-0235/2026 B10-0235/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
15. Alternative motion B10-0205/2026 B10-0205/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
16. Alternative motion B10-0206/2026 B10-0206/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
17. Alternative motion B10-0207/2026 B10-0207/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
18. Alternative motion B10-0208/2026 B10-0208/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
19. Alternative motion B10-0212/2026 B10-0212/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
20. Alternative motion B10-0213/2026 B10-0213/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed