Skip to content
25 Resolutions & reports ·decision 25 of 27 on Wednesday, 29 April 2026

The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report

Committee report by Konstantinos Arvanitis · voted 14:53–14:58

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by a large majority 387 for · 191 against · 46 abstained (62 % in favour) EU institutions & ParliamentJustice, rule of law & rightsRule of law in member statesFundamental rightsInstitutions & treaties

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 387 Against 191 Abstained 46

Final vote — text as a whole at 14:58 · 62% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its resolution on the Commission's 2025 Rule of Law report, setting out its position on the state of rule of law in the EU. The resolution calls for strengthening the Commission's reporting, protecting journalists and civil society, and ensuring EU funds do not facilitate rights violations. It also urges EU institutions to respect rule of law obligations and to address socio-economic inequalities and racism as part of the rule of law agenda.

How the vote unfolded · 32 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 20 amendments (1 adopted, 19 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (10 adopted, 1 rejected).

Roll calls requested by S&D, PPE, ECR, PfE · split votes by S&D (2), PPE, ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 32 ballots in voting order
1. Paragraph 5 — part 1 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 5/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘elected by their peers,’” requested by S&D requested by PfE
Adopted
2. Paragraph 5 — part 2 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 5/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by S&D requested by PfE
Adopted
3. Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 10 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 10 – Am 18 requested by S&D
Rejected
4. Amendment 1 to paragraph 13 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 13 – Am 1 requested by PfE
Adopted
5. Paragraph 15 — part 1 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 15/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘elected by their peers,’” requested by S&D requested by PfE
Adopted
6. Paragraph 15 — part 2 14:53 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 15/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by S&D requested by PfE
Adopted
7. Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 34 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 34 – Am 19 requested by S&D
Rejected
8. Amendment 15 to paragraph 38 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 38 – Am 15 requested by ECR
Rejected
9. Amendment 16 to paragraph 44 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 44 – Am 16 requested by ECR
Rejected
10. Amendment 17 to paragraph 55 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 55 – Am 17 requested by ECR
Rejected
11. Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 65 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 65 – Am 2 requested by S&D, ECR
Rejected
12. Amendment 3 to paragraph 77 14:54 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 77 – Am 3 requested by S&D, ECR
Rejected
13. Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 86 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 86 – Am 4 requested by PfE
Rejected
14. Amendment 5 to paragraph 91 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 91 – Am 5 requested by PfE
Rejected
15. Separate vote on paragraph 100 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 100 requested by PfE
Adopted
16. Separate vote on paragraph 101 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 101 requested by PPE
Adopted
17. Separate vote on paragraph 102 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 102 requested by PPE
Adopted
18. Amendment 6 to paragraph 103 14:55 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 103 – Am 6 requested by S&D
Rejected
19. Amendment 7 to paragraph 112 14:56 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112 – Am 7 requested by S&D
Rejected
20. Paragraph 112 — part 1 14:56 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/1 Part 1: ‘Reiterates the obligation of Member States to respect EU and international law in the field of migration and asylum on land and at sea;’ requested by ECR, PPE requested by S&D
Adopted
21. Paragraph 112 — part 2 14:56 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/2 Part 2: ‘calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that migration and asylum policies, including the Pact on Migration and Asylum, are implemented in full compliance with the Charter, the principle of non-refoulement and the principle of responsibility-sharing to ensure that people’s rights to asylum and international protection are upheld;’ requested by ECR, PPE requested by S&D
Adopted
22. Paragraph 112 — part 3 14:56 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 112/3 Part 3: ‘reiterates that practices such as stopping asylum seekers and forcibly returning them to the country they entered from without carrying out an individual assessment, arbitrary detention and obstruction of humanitarian aid are contrary to EU and international law;’ requested by ECR, PPE requested by PPE, S&D
Rejected
23. Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 113 14:56 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 113 – Am 8 requested by PfE
Rejected
24. Amendment 9 to paragraph 116 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 116 – Am 9 requested by S&D
Rejected
25. Separate vote on paragraph 117 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 117 requested by PPE
Adopted
26. Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 118 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 118 – Am 20 requested by S&D
Rejected
27. Amendment 10 to paragraph 126 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 126 – Am 10 requested by S&D
Rejected
28. Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 155 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – After § 155 – Am 13 requested by S&D
Rejected
29. Amendment 11 to paragraph 168 14:57 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 168 – Am 11 requested by S&D
Rejected
30. Amendment 12 to paragraph 185 14:58 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – § 185 – Am 12 requested by S&D
Rejected
31. Amendment 14 to recital R 14:58 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – Recital R – Am 14 requested by ECR
Rejected
32. Final vote — text as a whole 14:58 A10-0091/2026 – Konstantinos Arvanitis – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 29 April 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0091 in procedure 2025/2239.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site