← 25 November 27 November →

Plenary sitting, Wednesday, 26 November 2025

MEPs decided on 11 subjects between 12:07 and 12:52 — 8 adopted, 3 rejected. That took 215 ballots, 106 of them by roll call with every MEP’s position recorded.

11
subjects decided
8 / 3
adopted / rejected
215
ballots, incl. 66 amendments
106
roll calls (per-MEP record)
Tightest result of the day: Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups — Adopted 360–298
New here? How plenary voting works and how to read this page

A sitting is one day of voting in the Parliament’s plenary. Everything voted that day is listed here by subject — a report, resolution, agreement or objection the Parliament is deciding on. Subjects are sorted into sections by what kind of decision they are (new laws, international agreements, non-binding resolutions, …); each section explains what “adopted” means there.

Each subject can involve many ballots. MEPs first vote on amendments (proposed changes) and on parts of the text a group asked to vote on separately, then hold the decisive vote on the whole text — that is the result shown at the top of every subject. The strip of squares and circles under it shows all the ballots in the order they were taken; open the list to see each one.

Only roll-call votes record how each MEP voted — click one to see every individual position and the full breakdown by political group. The row of group badges (✓ mostly for, ✗ mostly against, – mostly abstained, ~ split) shows which groups backed a result. Votes by show of hands record only the outcome.

Every subject is based on a document (a committee report, a motion for a resolution, or a Council/Commission text) and belongs to a procedure — the full legislative file that can span years. The buttons on each subject take you to both.

Glossary: Am 27 = amendment 27 · § 5 = paragraph 5 · part 1/2 = a paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts (a split vote) · separate vote = a paragraph voted on its own, usually so a group can vote against it · = joins identical amendments voted together · 1st reading (***I) = Parliament’s first pass at a proposed law · Lapsed = fell away without a vote because an earlier vote settled the matter.

New EU laws

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

1

Deforestation Regulation: certain obligations of operators and traders

1st reading · voted 12:12–12:29

Adopted Adopted by a clear majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 402 Against 250 Abstained 8

Final vote at 12:29 · 61% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D and Renew.

How the vote unfolded · 91 ballots

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 34 amendments (10 adopted, 24 rejected) and 54 parts of the text voted on separately (26 adopted, 5 rejected, 23 lapsed). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, PPE, ECR, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 91 ballots in voting order
1. Proposal to reject the text 12:12 C10-0263/2025 – Proposal for rejection – Am 1= 37=
Rejected
2. Amendment 7 12:12 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – before point 1; Recital 68 – Am 7 Roll call requested by PfE, Verts/ALE
Rejected
3. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 1 – point b; Article 2 – point b – point 15a
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Amendment 8 12:13 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 2; Article 3 – point c – Am 8 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
5. Amendment 32 12:13 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 4 – point c; Article 4 – § 7 – Am 32
Rejected
6. Amendment 9 12:13 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 4 – after point c; Article 4 – after § 7 – Am 9 Roll call requested by PfE, Verts/ALE
Rejected
7. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 5; Article 4a – § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 5; Article 4a – § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 5; Article 4a – § 3
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 5; Article 4a – § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
11. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 5; Article 4a – § 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 5; Article 4a – § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
13. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 6; Article 5 – § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Amendment 10 12:14 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 6; Article 5 – after § 1 – Am 10 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
15. Amendment 33 12:14 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 6; Article 5 – § 3 – point a – Am 33
Rejected
16. Amendments 50 + 80 + 120 (voted as one) 12:15 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 6; Article 5 – § 3 – point a – Am 50= 80= 120= Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
17. Amendments 34 + 49 + 81 + 121 (voted as one) 12:15 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 6; Article 5 – § 5 – Am 34D= 49D= 81D= 121D= Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
18. Amendment 35 12:15 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 6; Article 5 – § 6 – Am 35
Rejected
19. Amendment 36 12:15 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 6; Article 5 – § 7 – Am 36 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
20. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 15; Article 25 – point a – § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
21. Amendments 82 + 122 (voted as one) 12:16 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 16; Article 26 – § 4 – Am 82= 122= Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
22. Amendment 11 12:16 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – after point 18; Article 29 – Am 11 Roll call requested by PfE, Verts/ALE
Rejected
23. Amendment 30 12:16 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 21; Article 34 – after § 1 – Am 30
Rejected
24. Amendment 12 12:16 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 21; Article 34 – after § 1 – Am 12 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
25. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 21; Article 34 – after § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
26. Amendments 62 + 123 (voted as one) 12:17 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 21; Article 34 – after § 1 – Am 62= 123= Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
27. Amendment 13 12:17 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 21; Article 34 – § 2 – point c – Am 13D Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
28. Amendment 14 12:17 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 21; Article 34 – § 2 – point h – Am 14D Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
29. Amendment 15 12:17 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 21; Article 34 – § 2 – point i – Am 15 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
30. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 21; Article 34 – after § 2
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
31. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 22; Article 37 – § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
32. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 22; Article 37 – § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
33. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 22; Article 37 – § 2
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
34. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 22; Article 37 – § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
35. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 22; Article 37 – after § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
36. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 22; Article 37 – § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
37. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 22; Article 37 – § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
38. Amendment 24 12:18 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 2 – Am 24
Rejected
39. Amendment 25 12:19 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 2 – Am 25
Rejected
40. Amendments 63 + 128 (voted as one) 12:19 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 2 – Am 63= 128=
Adopted
41. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
42. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 2
Lapsed
43. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
44. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – after § 2
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
45. Amendment 26 12:20 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 3 – Am 26D
Rejected
46. Amendments 64 + 129 (voted as one) 12:20 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 3 – Am 64= 129= Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
47. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
48. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 3
Lapsed
49. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
50. Amendments 27 + 89 + 130 (voted as one) 12:20 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 4 – Am 27D= 89D= 130D= Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
51. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
52. Amendments 28 + 90 + 131 (voted as one) 12:20 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 5 – Am 28D= 90D= 131D=
Adopted
53. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
54. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
55. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 5
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
56. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – point 23; Article 38 – § 5
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
57. Amendment 20 12:21 C10-0263/2025 – Article 1, after point 23 – Am 20 Roll call requested by PfE, Verts/ALE
Rejected
58. Separate vote: article 1, after point 23 Article 1, after point 23
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
59. Amendments 60 + 91 + 132 (voted as one) 12:22 C10-0263/2025 – Annexe II; Annexe III – introductory part – Am 60= 91= 132= Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
60. Amendments 92 + 133 (voted as one) 12:22 C10-0263/2025 – Annexe II; Annexe III – § 2 – Am 92= 133= Roll call requested by PPE
Adopted
61. Separate vote: annex II; Annexe III Annex II; Annexe III – § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
62. Separate vote: annex II; Annexe III Annex II; Annexe III – § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
63. Amendment 38 12:25 C10-0263/2025 – After recital 1 – Am 38 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
64. Amendment 31 12:25 C10-0263/2025 – Recital 6 – Am 31
Rejected
65. Separate vote: recital 6 Recital 6
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
66. Separate vote: recital 7 Recital 7
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
67. Separate vote: after recital 8 After recital 8
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
68. Separate vote: after recital 8 After recital 8
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
69. Separate vote: recital 11 Recital 11
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
70. Separate vote: after recital 12 After recital 12
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
71. Separate vote: after recital 12 After recital 12
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
72. Separate vote: after recital 12 After recital 12
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
73. Separate vote: after recital 12 After recital 12
Lapsed
74. Separate vote: after recital 12 After recital 12
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
75. Separate vote: after recital 12 After recital 12
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
76. Amendment 29 12:27 C10-0263/2025 – After recital 12 – Am 29
Rejected
77. Separate vote: recital 13 Recital 13
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
78. Separate vote: recital 13 Recital 13
Lapsed
79. Separate vote: recital 13 Recital 13
Lapsed
80. Separate vote: recital 13 Recital 13
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
81. Separate vote: recital 13 Recital 13
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
82. Amendments 109 + 23 (voted as one) 12:27 C10-0263/2025 – Recital 14 – Am 109D= 23D=
Rejected
83. Separate vote: recital 14 Recital 14
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
84. Separate vote: recital 15 Recital 15
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
85. Separate vote: recital 16 Recital 16
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
86. Separate vote: recital 16 Recital 16
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
87. Amendment 5 12:28 C10-0263/2025 – After recital 17 – Am 5 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
88. Amendment 6 12:28 C10-0263/2025 – After recital 17 – Am 6 Roll call requested by PfE, Verts/ALE
Rejected
89. Separate vote: after recital 19 After recital 19
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
90. Final vote 12:29 C10-0263/2025 – Commission proposal
Adopted
91. Referral back to committee Request for referral back (Rule 60(4))
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2

Increasing the efficiency of the EU guarantee under the InvestEU Regulation and simplifying reporting requirements

Committee report by Aura Salla, Irene Tinagli · 1st reading · voted at 12:30

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 519 Against 65 Abstained 73

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 12:30 · 79% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by ESN; The Left and PfE mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 9 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 parts of the text voted on separately (6 lapsed).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 9 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote on the provisional agreement 12:30 A10-0117/2025 – Aura Salla, Irene Tinagli – Provisional agreement – Am 2
Adopted
2. Final vote Text as a whole
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
3. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – § 1 – point 24 – after sub§ 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
4. Separate vote: article 1 Article 1 – § 1 – point 24 – after sub§ 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5. Separate vote: after recital 2 After recital 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
6. Separate vote: after recital 2 After recital 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
7. Separate vote: after recital 2 After recital 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
8. Separate vote: after recital 2 After recital 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
9. Final vote Commission proposal
Lapsed
3

Collection of statistical information by the European Central Bank

Committee report by Aurore Lalucq · Consultation · voted at 12:31

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 521 Against 110 Abstained 35

Final vote at 12:31 · 78% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by PfE and ESN.

Budget & emergency funds

Spending decisions: amending budgets, solidarity and adjustment funds.

4

Draft amending budget No 3/2025: adjustment in payment appropriations, update of revenues and other technical updates

Committee report by Victor Negrescu · voted 12:07–12:08

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

The spending was approved.

For 519 Against 99 Abstained 45

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:08 · 78% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 10 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 5 amendments (5 rejected) and 4 parts of the text voted on separately (4 adopted).

Roll call requested by PfE · separate votes by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 10 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 2 12:07 A10-0237/2025 – Victor Negrescu – § 1 – Am 2 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
2. Separate vote: paragraph 2 § 2 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Separate vote: paragraph 4 § 4 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Amendment 3 12:07 A10-0237/2025 – Victor Negrescu – § 8 – Am 3 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
5. Amendment 4 12:07 A10-0237/2025 – Victor Negrescu – § 8 – Am 4 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
6. Amendment 5 12:07 A10-0237/2025 – Victor Negrescu – After § 8 – Am 5 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
7. Separate vote: citation 6 Citation 6 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Separate vote: citation 7 Citation 7 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Amendment 1 12:08 A10-0237/2025 – Victor Negrescu – Recital E – Am 1 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
10. Final vote — text as a whole 12:08 A10-0237/2025 – Victor Negrescu – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Objections to Commission measures

Parliament can veto technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Adopting an objection blocks the measure; rejecting it lets the measure go ahead.

5

Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act

amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as regards the definition of prohibited weapons

Motion for a resolution · voted at 12:49

Rejected Rejected by a clear majority

The objection failed — the Commission measure goes ahead.

For 88 Against 388 Abstained 184

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 12:49 · 13% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left and ESN; opposed by Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; Verts/ALE and S&D mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 5 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 parts of the text voted on separately (2 rejected).

Roll call requested by The Left · split votes by The Left (B10-0501/2025).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 5 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote on the motion for a resolution 12:49 B10-0499/2025 – Motion for a resolution Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
2. Separate vote: recital J Recital J Split vote requested by The Left (B10-0501/2025)
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Recital J — part 2 12:49 B10-0501/2025 – Recital J/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by The Left (B10-0501/2025)
Rejected
4. Final vote — text as a whole Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by The Left
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion for a resolution Roll call requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6

Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act

amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2429 as regards origin labelling for fruit and vegetables originating in the non-self-governing territory of Western Sahara

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:51–12:52

Rejected Rejected narrowly

The objection failed — the Commission measure goes ahead.

For 359 Against 188 Abstained 76

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:52 · 58% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and ECR; opposed by PPE, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 10 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 8 parts of the text voted on separately (7 adopted, 1 rejected).

Roll call requested by Verts/ALE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 10 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote on the motion for a resolution 12:51 B10-0503/2025 – Motion for a resolution Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
2. Separate vote: recital A Recital A
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Separate vote: after recital A After recital A
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Separate vote: after recital A After recital A
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Separate vote: after recital A After recital A
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Separate vote: recital B Recital B
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Separate vote: after recital B After recital B
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Separate vote: after recital C After recital C
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Separate vote: recital D Recital D
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Final vote — text as a whole 12:52 B10-0506/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected

Resolutions & reports

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

7

2026 budgetary procedure: joint text

Committee report by Andrzej Halicki, Matjaž Nemec · voted at 12:08

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 419 Against 185 Abstained 53

Joint text at 12:08 · 64% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by The Left, PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

8

EU’s diplomatic strategy and geopolitical cooperation in the Arctic

Committee report by Urmas Paet · voted 12:31–12:34

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 510 Against 75 Abstained 80

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:34 · 77% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by ESN; The Left and PfE mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 25 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 rejected) and 22 parts of the text voted on separately (19 adopted, 3 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, PfE, ESN · split votes by The Left (2), PfE (5) · separate votes by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 25 ballots in voting order
1. Paragraph 1, point a — part 1 12:31 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point a/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘particularly due to Russia’s extensive military restructuring, including the establishment of the Maritime Collegium’ and ‘in combination with China’s clear interest in the region,’” Split vote requested by The Left
Adopted
2. Paragraph 1, point a — part 2 12:31 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point a/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by The Left
Adopted
3. Separate vote: paragraph 1, point c § 1, point c Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Paragraph 1, point c — part 2 12:31 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point c/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
Adopted
5. Separate vote: paragraph 1, point e 12:32 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point e
Adopted
6. Separate vote: paragraph 1, point g 12:32 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point g
Adopted
7. Amendment 3 12:32 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, after point e – Am 3 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
8. Amendment 4 12:32 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, after point o – Am 4 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
9. Separate vote: paragraph 1, point ab § 1, point ab
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Paragraph 1, point ad — part 1 12:33 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point ad/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘with that in mind, considering that Norway’s EU membership would strengthen both its national interests and the EU’s geopolitical resilience by closing critical gaps in the latter’s collective defence – notably in the GIUK gap’ and ‘and Norway’s potential EU accession’” Split vote requested by PfE
Adopted
11. Paragraph 1, point ad — part 2 12:33 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point ad/2 Part 2: ‘with that in mind, considering that Norway’s EU membership would strengthen both its national interests and the EU’s geopolitical resilience by closing critical gaps in the latter’s collective defence – notably in the GIUK gap’ Split vote requested by PfE
Adopted
12. Paragraph 1, point ad — part 3 12:33 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point ad/3 Part 3: ‘and Norway’s potential EU accession’ Split vote requested by PfE
Adopted
13. Separate vote: paragraph 1, point ag § 1, point ag Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Paragraph 1, point ag — part 2 12:33 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – § 1, point ag/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
Adopted
15. Separate vote: paragraph 1, point an § 1, point an
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
16. Separate vote: paragraph 1, point aq § 1, point aq
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
17. Separate vote: recital I Recital I
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
18. Recital J — part 1 of 2 Recital J Part 1: ‘whereas the Arctic Greenland-Iceland-United Kingdom (GIUK) gap constitutes a strategic corridor that enables the control of maritime traffic and the detection of hybrid threats;’ Split vote requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
19. Recital J — part 2 of 2 Recital J Part 2: ‘whereas Finland and Sweden’s accession to NATO has deepened the Arctic orientation of the Alliance and will enhance its posture in the region;’ Split vote requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Separate vote: recital L Recital L Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
21. Recital L — part 2 12:34 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – Recital L/2 Part 2: ‘whereas the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the European Green Deal remains necessary in order to prevent the worst consequences of climate change;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
22. Recital AA — part 1 of 2 Recital AA Part 1: ‘whereas the United States’ approach to the Arctic is evolving towards expanded involvement,’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
23. Recital AA — part 2 of 2 Recital AA Part 2: ‘preceded by certain regrettable statements involving Greenland;’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
24. Separate vote: recital AQ Recital AQ
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
25. Final vote — text as a whole 12:34 A10-0229/2025 – Urmas Paet – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
9

Protection of minors online

Committee report by Christel Schaldemose · voted 12:35–12:39

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 483 Against 92 Abstained 86

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:39 · 73% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and PfE; opposed by ECR and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 24 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 amendments (6 rejected) and 17 parts of the text voted on separately (15 adopted, 2 rejected).

Roll calls requested by ECR, Members · split votes by Members (4) · separate votes by Members.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 24 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 1 12:35 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – After § 1 – Am 1 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
2. Separate vote: paragraph 16 12:35 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 16 Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
3. Amendment 4 12:35 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 17 – Am 4 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
4. Paragraph 17 — part 1 12:35 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 17/1 Part 1: ‘Welcomes the Commission’s risk-based approach taken in its guidelines for effective, proportionate and privacy-preserving age assurance mechanisms to protect minors online, in accordance with the DSA; highlights that the Commission considers the use of access restrictions supported by age verification methods an appropriate and proportionate measure to ensure a high level of privacy, safety and security for minors;’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
5. Separate vote: paragraph 17 § 17 Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Separate vote: paragraph 18 12:36 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 18 Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
7. Separate vote: after paragraph 18 After § 18
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Amendment 5 12:36 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 20 – Am 5 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
9. Amendment 6 12:36 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 23 – Am 6 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
10. Paragraph 23 — part 1 of 2 § 23 Part 1: ‘Encourages collaboration between the Member States that have already developed digital tools for effective age verification’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Paragraph 23 — part 2 of 2 § 23 Part 2: ‘and the Commission in order to develop a strong and effective age verification tool at EU level, ensuring full respect for the technical specifications derived from the eIDAS2 Regulation;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Amendment 7 12:37 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 24 – Am 7 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
13. Paragraph 24 — part 1 12:37 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 24/1 Part 1: ‘Welcomes the Commission’s efforts to provide an EU-wide solution by developing an age-verification app and the EU Digital Identity (eID) Wallet;’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
14. Separate vote: paragraph 24 § 24 Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Paragraph 25 — part 1 of 2 § 25 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘considers that, to date, the eID Wallet fulfils these objectives;’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
16. Paragraph 25 — part 1 12:37 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 25/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘considers that, to date, the eID Wallet fulfils these objectives;’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
17. Paragraph 25 — part 2 of 2 § 25 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
18. Amendment 3 12:38 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 28 – Am 3 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
19. Separate vote: paragraph 31 12:38 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 31 Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
20. Separate vote: paragraph 33 12:38 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 33 Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
21. Separate vote: paragraph 41 § 41 Separate vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
22. Separate vote: paragraph 70 12:38 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 70 Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
23. Separate vote: paragraph 81 12:38 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – § 81 Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
24. Final vote — text as a whole 12:39 A10-0213/2025 – Christel Schaldemose – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
10

Access to finance for SMEs and scale-ups

Committee report by Jorge Martín Frías · voted at 12:41

Adopted Adopted by a clear majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 360 Against 298 Abstained 8

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:41 · 54% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D and Renew.

How the vote unfolded · 2 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected).

Roll call requested by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 2 ballots in voting order
11

Protecting EU consumers against the practices of certain e-commerce platforms: the case of child-like sex dolls, weapons and other illegal products and material

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:42–12:48

Rejected Rejected by an overwhelming majority

Parliament rejected the text.

For 49 Against 600 Abstained 16

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 12:42 · 7% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left; opposed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 37 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 18 amendments (18 rejected) and 15 parts of the text voted on separately (11 adopted, 4 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, ECR, PfE · split votes by PfE, ECR (B10-0500/2025) (5).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 37 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote on the motion for a resolution 12:42 B10-0496/2025 – Motion for a resolution Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
2. Amendment 3 12:42 B10-0500/2025 – § 1 – Am 3
Rejected
3. Amendment 4 12:42 B10-0500/2025 – After § 1 – Am 4
Rejected
4. Amendment 5 12:43 B10-0500/2025 – After § 1 – Am 5
Rejected
5. Amendment 6 12:43 B10-0500/2025 – After § 1 – Am 6
Rejected
6. Amendment 7 12:43 B10-0500/2025 – After § 6 – Am 7
Rejected
7. Amendment 18 12:43 B10-0500/2025 – § 11 – Am 18 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
8. Paragraph 9 — part 1 of 2 § 9 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and the absence of harmonised and interoperable technological tools across the Member States,’” Split vote requested by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Paragraph 9 — part 2 of 2 § 9 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Paragraph 10 — part 1 of 2 § 10 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including the introduction of a harmonised EU-level WTO-compliant handling fee to cover the increased supervisory costs of custom authorities, and clearly defined responsibility for platforms and sellers established in third countries for the safety and compliance of products they target at EU consumers, which should accompany the removal of the VAT and customs duty exemption for low-value consignments that has been recently agreed in the Council;’” Split vote requested by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Paragraph 10 — part 2 of 2 § 10 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
12. Amendment 8 12:44 B10-0500/2025 – After § 11 – Am 8
Rejected
13. Amendment 9 12:44 B10-0500/2025 – After § 11 – Am 9
Rejected
14. Amendment 10 12:44 B10-0500/2025 – § 13 – Am 10 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
15. Paragraph 14 — part 1 of 2 § 14 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘temporary’” Split vote requested by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
16. Paragraph 14 — part 2 of 2 § 14 Part 2: “that word” Split vote requested by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
17. Separate vote: paragraph 17 § 17
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
18. Amendment 17 12:45 B10-0500/2025 – After § 19 – Am 17
Rejected
19. Separate vote: paragraph 25 § 25 Split vote requested by PfE, ECR (B10-0500/2025)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Paragraph 25 — part 2 12:45 B10-0500/2025 – § 25/2 Part 2: ‘underlines the need to grant the Commission direct investigatory and sanctioning powers for serious, high-impact infringements of consumer law, in order to secure coherent, simultaneous and deterrent enforcement throughout the EU;’ Split vote requested by PfE, ECR (B10-0500/2025)
Adopted
21. Paragraph 28 — part 1 of 2 § 28 Part 1: ‘Urges the Member States, furthermore, to considerably accelerate the digitalisation of import procedures in customs administrations, supported by the EU Customs Data Hub, in order to ensure the effective application of current legislation and to speed up customs clearance, in particular given the exponential growth in parcel flows; calls on the Member States to increase the use of automated processes, such as automatic label scanning during parcel processing at customs; stresses that the wide use of the digital product passport would allow ex ante compliance verification for all products imported via e-commerce, containing detailed quality and compliance information and which would be integrated directly into the EU Customs Data Hub;’ Split vote requested by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
22. Paragraph 28 — part 2 of 2 § 28 Part 2: ‘calls on the Commission to cover, as soon as possible, all physical goods placed on the EU market with the digital product passport;’ Split vote requested by ECR (B10-0500/2025)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
23. Amendment 11 12:45 B10-0500/2025 – § 31 – Am 11
Rejected
24. Amendment 12 12:45 B10-0500/2025 – After § 31 – Am 12
Rejected
25. Amendment 13 12:46 B10-0500/2025 – After § 31 – Am 13
Rejected
26. Amendment 14 12:46 B10-0500/2025 – After § 31 – Am 14
Rejected
27. Amendment 16 12:46 B10-0500/2025 – After § 32 – Am 16 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
28. Separate vote: after paragraph 32 After § 32
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
29. Separate vote: after paragraph 32 After § 32
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
30. Amendment 15 12:46 B10-0500/2025 – § 33 – Am 15
Rejected
31. Separate vote: after recital B After recital B
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
32. Amendment 1 12:48 B10-0500/2025 – After recital C – Am 1
Rejected
33. Amendment 2 12:48 B10-0500/2025 – After recital E – Am 2
Rejected
34. Separate vote: after recital E After recital E
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
35. Final vote — text as a whole Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
36. Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion for a resolution Roll call requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
37. Final vote on the motion for a resolution Motion for a resolution Roll call requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed