Skip to content

← Decision 1 Decision 3 →

2 New EU laws ·decision 2 of 11 on Wednesday, 26 November 2025

Increasing the efficiency of the EU guarantee under the InvestEU Regulation and simplifying reporting requirements

Committee report by Aura Salla, Irene Tinagli · · voted at 12:30

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 519 for · 65 against · 73 abstained (79 % in favour) Economy & single marketEU budget & fundsSimplification & red tapeEuropean Investment Bank
The vote✦ In shortFull textProcedure

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 519 Against 65 Abstained 73

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 12:30 · 79% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left –
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by ESN; The Left and PfE mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its position on a proposal to amend the InvestEU Regulation to increase the efficiency of the EU guarantee and simplify reporting requirements. The changes aim to improve access to finance for small and medium-sized enterprises, reduce administrative burdens, and support EU priorities like innovation, green and digital transitions, and defence. Parliament also calls on the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends its proposal.

How the vote unfolded · 9 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 parts of the text voted on separately (6 lapsed).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 9 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote on the provisional agreement 12:30 A10-0117/2025 – Aura Salla, Irene Tinagli – Provisional agreement – Am 2
Adopted
2. Final vote Text as a whole
— no individual positions recorded
3. Separate vote on Article 1 Article 1 – § 1 – point 24 – after sub§ 1
— no individual positions recorded
4. Separate vote on Article 1 Article 1 – § 1 – point 24 – after sub§ 1
— no individual positions recorded
5. Vote on text inserted after recital 2
— no individual positions recorded
6. Vote on text inserted after recital 2
— no individual positions recorded
7. Vote on text inserted after recital 2
— no individual positions recorded
8. Vote on text inserted after recital 2
— no individual positions recorded
9. Final vote Commission proposal

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 26 November 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0117 in procedure 2025/0040.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site