← 26 November 15 December →

Plenary sitting, Thursday, 27 November 2025

MEPs decided on 13 subjects between 12:03 and 12:40 — 13 adopted. That took 215 ballots, 125 of them by roll call with every MEP’s position recorded.

13
subjects decided
13 / 0
adopted / rejected
215
ballots, incl. 52 amendments
125
roll calls (per-MEP record)
Tightest result of the day: Application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative process — Adopted 337–245
New here? How plenary voting works and how to read this page

A sitting is one day of voting in the Parliament’s plenary. Everything voted that day is listed here by subject — a report, resolution, agreement or objection the Parliament is deciding on. Subjects are sorted into sections by what kind of decision they are (new laws, international agreements, non-binding resolutions, …); each section explains what “adopted” means there.

Each subject can involve many ballots. MEPs first vote on amendments (proposed changes) and on parts of the text a group asked to vote on separately, then hold the decisive vote on the whole text — that is the result shown at the top of every subject. The strip of squares and circles under it shows all the ballots in the order they were taken; open the list to see each one.

Only roll-call votes record how each MEP voted — click one to see every individual position and the full breakdown by political group. The row of group badges (✓ mostly for, ✗ mostly against, – mostly abstained, ~ split) shows which groups backed a result. Votes by show of hands record only the outcome.

Every subject is based on a document (a committee report, a motion for a resolution, or a Council/Commission text) and belongs to a procedure — the full legislative file that can span years. The buttons on each subject take you to both.

Glossary: Am 27 = amendment 27 · § 5 = paragraph 5 · part 1/2 = a paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts (a split vote) · separate vote = a paragraph voted on its own, usually so a group can vote against it · = joins identical amendments voted together · 1st reading (***I) = Parliament’s first pass at a proposed law · Lapsed = fell away without a vote because an earlier vote settled the matter.

New EU laws

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

1

Amending Regulations on the Internal Market Information System (IMI) and on the single digital gateway as regards certain harmonisation requirements on transparency

Committee report by Adina Vălean · 1st reading · voted at 12:06

📄 Report A-10-2025-0209 Full procedure 2023/0462
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 400 Against 77 Abstained 132

Final vote at 12:06 · 66% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE –
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by The Left and ESN; Verts/ALE and PfE mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 2 ballots

Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 2 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote 12:06 A10-0209/2025 – Adina Vălean – Commission proposal and amendment
Adopted
2. Referral back to committee Request for referral back (Rule 60(4))
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2

Harmonised requirements in the internal market on transparency of third countries interest representation

Committee report by Adina Vălean · 1st reading · voted 12:07–12:09

📄 Report A-10-2025-0208 Full procedure 2023/0463
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 392 Against 88 Abstained 133

Final vote at 12:09 · 64% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE –
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by The Left and ESN; Verts/ALE and PfE mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 12 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 8 parts of the text voted on separately (6 adopted, 2 rejected). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Roll call requested by PfE · split votes by PfE (2).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 12 ballots in voting order
1. Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Amendment 168 12:07 A10-0208/2025 – Adina Vălean – Article 10, § 2 – Am 168 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
3. Separate vote: article 10, paragraph 3 Article 10, § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Separate vote: article 10, paragraph 3 Article 10, § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Separate vote: article 12, after paragraph 3 Article 12, after § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Separate vote: article 12, after paragraph 3 Article 12, after § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Separate vote: article 19, paragraph 4 Article 19, § 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Separate vote: article 19, paragraph 4 Article 19, § 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Separate vote: recital 36 Recital 36
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Separate vote: recital 36 Recital 36
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Final vote 12:09 A10-0208/2025 – Adina Vălean – Commission proposal
Adopted
12. Referral back to committee Request for referral back (Rule 60(4))
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted

Objections to Commission measures

Parliament can veto technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Adopting an objection blocks the measure; rejecting it lets the measure go ahead.

3

Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

Financing of the 2025 action plan for Tanzania

Motion for a resolution

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0505 Full procedure 2025/2979
Adopted Adopted

The objection passed — the Commission measure is blocked.

Final vote — text as a whole — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

Resolutions & reports

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

4

Post-election killings and the deteriorating human rights situation in Tanzania, including the case of imprisoned opposition leader Tundu Lissu

Motion for a resolution · voted at 12:03

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0530 Full procedure 2025/2990
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 539 Against 0 Abstained 27

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:03 · 95% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI –

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 8 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll call requested by Renew.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 8 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: after paragraph 7 After § 7
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Final vote — text as a whole 12:03 RC-B10-0514/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
3. Alternative motion B10-0514/2025 B10-0514/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
4. Alternative motion B10-0515/2025 B10-0515/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5. Alternative motion B10-0524/2025 B10-0524/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
6. Alternative motion B10-0527/2025 B10-0527/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
7. Alternative motion B10-0530/2025 B10-0530/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
8. Alternative motion B10-0534/2025 B10-0534/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5

Escalating repression of the Baha’is in Iran

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:04–12:05

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0528 Full procedure 2025/2987
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 549 Against 7 Abstained 31

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:05 · 94% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI –

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 12 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 12 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 3 12:04 RC-B10-0528/2025 – After § 5 – Am 3 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
2. Amendment 4 12:04 RC-B10-0528/2025 – After § 9 – Am 4 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
3. Amendment 1 12:04 RC-B10-0528/2025 – After recital D – Am 1 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
4. Amendment 2 12:05 RC-B10-0528/2025 – After recital D – Am 2 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
5. Final vote — text as a whole 12:05 RC-B10-0528/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
6. Alternative motion B10-0509/2025 B10-0509/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
7. Alternative motion B10-0526/2025 B10-0526/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
8. Alternative motion B10-0528/2025 B10-0528/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
9. Alternative motion B10-0529/2025 B10-0529/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
10. Alternative motion B10-0531/2025 B10-0531/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
11. Alternative motion B10-0535/2025 B10-0535/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
12. Alternative motion B10-0541/2025 B10-0541/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
6

Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:05–12:06

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0522 Full procedure 2025/2988
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 464 Against 58 Abstained 75

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:06 · 78% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR –
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 12 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 2 parts of the text voted on separately (2 adopted). 8 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by Renew, ECR, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 12 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: paragraph 1 12:05 RC-B10-0518/2025 – § 1 Roll call requested by ECR, PfE
Adopted
2. Separate vote: paragraph 2 12:05 RC-B10-0518/2025 – § 2 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
3. Amendment 1 12:06 RC-B10-0518/2025 – After § 7 – Am 1 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
4. Final vote — text as a whole 12:06 RC-B10-0518/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
5. Alternative motion B10-0518/2025 B10-0518/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
6. Alternative motion B10-0520/2025 B10-0520/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
7. Alternative motion B10-0522/2025 B10-0522/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
8. Alternative motion B10-0525/2025 B10-0525/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
9. Alternative motion B10-0532/2025 B10-0532/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
10. Alternative motion B10-0536/2025 B10-0536/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
11. Alternative motion B10-0537/2025 B10-0537/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
12. Alternative motion B10-0538/2025 B10-0538/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
7

Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement

Committee report by Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry · voted 12:10–12:17

📄 Report A-10-2025-0226 Full procedure 2024/2108
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 490 Against 41 Abstained 74

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:17 · 81% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left –
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 41 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 36 parts of the text voted on separately (35 adopted, 1 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, PfE, ESN · split votes by The Left (3), Verts/ALE, PfE (6) · separate votes by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 41 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: paragraph 13 12:10 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 13 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
2. Amendment 2 12:10 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – After § 125 – Am 2 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
3. Paragraph 126 — part 1 of 2 § 126 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘encourages the EU and the UK to work together to end Russian energy dependence by halting imports of all Russian fossil fuels at the earliest opportunity, including oil, gas, liquefied natural gas (LNG), nuclear fuels, and other nuclear materials; notes that both the EU and the UK are continuing to make progress towards their shared goal of ending all energy ties with Russia;’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Paragraph 126 — part 2 of 2 § 126 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Paragraph 168 — part 1 of 3 § 168 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the introduction of minimum catch sizes for certain species, the closure of fishing in marine protected areas (for example in the Dogger Bank),’ and ‘and the establishment of wind farms’” Split vote requested by Verts/ALE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Paragraph 168 — part 2 of 3 § 168 Part 2: ‘the introduction of minimum catch sizes for certain species, the closure of fishing in marine protected areas (for example in the Dogger Bank),’ Split vote requested by Verts/ALE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Paragraph 168 — part 3 of 3 § 168 Part 3: ‘and the establishment of wind farms’ Split vote requested by Verts/ALE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Amendment 4 12:11 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – After § 172 – Am 4 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
9. Separate vote: paragraph 199 12:11 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 199 Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
10. Separate vote: paragraph 204 § 204 Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Paragraph 204 — part 2 12:11 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 204/2 Part 2: ‘hopes that both parties can avoid the delays that have characterised UK participation in Horizon Europe and the Copernicus programme under the current MFF, in order to ensure continuity in funding for key EU research and innovation projects that involve UK partners;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
12. Separate vote: after paragraph 213 After § 213
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
13. Amendment 3 12:12 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – After § 244 – Am 3 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
14. Separate vote: paragraph 250 12:12 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 250 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
15. Paragraph 251 — part 1 of 2 § 251 Part 1: ‘Underlines the existential threat posed by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and its threats to expand this aggression to other countries of the European continent;’ Split vote requested by The Left, PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
16. Paragraph 251 — part 2 of 2 § 251 Part 2: ‘considers this to be the single most important threat facing our continent in the coming years, notwithstanding the importance of other issues;’ Split vote requested by The Left, PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
17. Paragraph 251 — part 3 12:13 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 251/3 Part 3: ‘calls for a commensurate policy response that gives priority to addressing the gaps in European defence and deterrence capabilities, especially in cooperation with like-minded European partners;’ Split vote requested by The Left, PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
18. Paragraph 252 — part 1 12:13 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/1 Part 1: ‘Welcomes the strong EU-UK cooperation in response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, as underscored at the EU-UK Summit; highlights the continued alignment of the EU and the UK;’ Split vote requested by The Left, PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
19. Paragraph 252 — part 2 12:13 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/2 Part 2: ‘sanctions, military and financial support and’ without the word ‘military’ Split vote requested by The Left, PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
20. Paragraph 252 — part 3 12:13 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/3 Part 3: ‘military’ Split vote requested by The Left, PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
21. Paragraph 252 — part 4 12:13 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/4 Part 4: ‘diplomatic coordination, as well as their shared commitment to restoring a comprehensive, just and lasting peace, based on the principles of international law, justice and accountability; calls for the EU and the UK to remain strongly united towards the rest of the international community in condemning Russia’s actions, defending the sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence of Ukraine, and in countering Russian disinformation about its war of aggression against Ukraine, and to continue their efforts towards achieving the broadest possible international support for these matters; commends the UK’s vital contribution to shaping a strong, unified European response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and in convening the ‘coalition of the willing’; welcomes the UK’s contribution to supporting Ukraine’s future repair and reconstruction; while respecting Member States’ military and security policies, including policies of military neutrality;’ without the words ‘commends the UK’s vital contribution to shaping a strong, unified European response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and in convening the ‘coalition of the willing’;’ Split vote requested by The Left, PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
22. Paragraph 252 — part 5 12:13 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/5 Part 5: ‘commends the UK’s vital contribution to shaping a strong, unified European response to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and in convening the ‘coalition of the willing’;’ Split vote requested by The Left, PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
23. Paragraph 252 — part 6 12:14 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 252/6 Part 6: ‘calls on the UK Government and all the Member States to significantly increase military assistance for Ukraine and to lift all restrictions on such assistance; recommends, in that regard, that actions undertaken in the framework of the SAFE Regulation by both the Member States and the UK also include Ukraine and its defence technology and industrial base;’ Split vote requested by The Left, PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
24. Separate vote: paragraph 254 12:14 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 254 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
25. Separate vote: paragraph 255 12:14 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 255 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
26. Separate vote: paragraph 257 12:14 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 257 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
27. Paragraph 258 — part 1 12:15 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 258/1 Part 1: ‘Underlines that the UK is a leading European defence actor with distinct expertise and advanced strategic capabilities; recognises the strength of its defence industrial base, particularly in the areas identified by the EU’s Readiness 2030 initiative and the European Defence Industrial Strategy as critical capability gaps, including integrated, multilayered air and missile defence, advanced artillery, long-range missile systems, and unmanned systems; acknowledges the deep links, complementarities and synergies between the European defence technological and industrial base and the UK’s defence technological and industrial base in pursuing shared security objectives by developing new collaborative arrangements in areas such as ballistic and hypersonic missile defence, space-based sensor systems, and early warning networks; calls for the EU, its Member States and the UK to make additional efforts to deepen cooperation between these industrial sectors and to strengthen the geographical coherence of a common European defence industrial base,’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
28. Paragraph 258 — part 2 12:15 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 258/2 Part 2: ‘which also incorporates Ukraine,’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
29. Paragraph 258 — part 3 12:15 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 258/3 Part 3: ‘including in the area of innovation and joint research and development;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
30. Paragraph 258 — part 4 12:15 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 258/4 Part 4: ‘welcomes efforts by Member States and the UK and their defence industries to invest in and partner with the Ukrainian defence industry, and calls on them to intensify such efforts, in particular through the establishment of joint ventures and by building up production capacity both in Ukraine and in Member States;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
31. Paragraph 258 — part 5 12:15 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 258/5 Part 5: ‘underlines that the strength of the EU defence industrial base can equally contribute to enhancing the UK’s security;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
32. Separate vote: paragraph 259 12:15 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 259 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
33. Separate vote: paragraph 260 12:16 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 260 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
34. Separate vote: paragraph 262 12:16 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – § 262 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
35. Paragraph 265 — part 1 of 2 § 265 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and gender’” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
36. Paragraph 265 — part 2 of 2 § 265 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
37. Separate vote: citation 21 Citation 21 Separate vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
38. Amendment 1 12:16 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – After recital J – Am 1 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
39. Separate vote: recital M Recital M Split vote requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
40. Recital M — part 2 12:17 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – recital M/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by The Left · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
41. Final vote — text as a whole 12:17 A10-0226/2025 – Thijs Reuten, Nina Carberry – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
8

EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities post-2024

Committee report by Rosa Estaràs Ferragut · voted 12:18–12:25

📄 Report A-10-2025-0211 Full procedure 2025/2057
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 490 Against 9 Abstained 109

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:25 · 81% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN –
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; PfE and ESN mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 41 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 adopted) and 39 parts of the text voted on separately (36 adopted, 1 rejected, 2 lapsed).

Roll calls requested by S&D, Renew · split votes by Members (15) · separate votes by Members.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 41 ballots in voting order
1. Paragraph 11 — part 1 of 2 § 11 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and intersectional’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Paragraph 11 — part 2 of 2 § 11 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Paragraph 12 — part 1 of 2 § 12 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘gender’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Paragraph 12 — part 2 of 2 § 12 Part 2: “that word” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Separate vote: paragraph 14 12:18 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 14 Separate vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
6. Paragraph 17 — part 1 12:18 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 17/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and binding’ and the words ‘including legal instruments’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
7. Paragraph 17 — part 2 12:18 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 17/2 Part 2: ‘and binding’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
8. Paragraph 17 — part 3 12:19 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 17/3 Part 3: ‘including legal instruments’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
9. Separate vote: after paragraph 17 After § 17
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Paragraph 18 — part 1 12:19 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 18/1 Part 1: ‘Calls on the Commission, as part of the implementation of the strategy, to include the rights of persons with disabilities in the post-2027 multiannual financial framework regulation, where relevant, especially by supporting civil society and organisations representing persons with disabilities and disability service providers through funding grants under the Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values Programme (CERV), ensuring robust cohesion funding, along with maintaining the horizontal and thematic enabling condition on the implementation of the UNCRPD supported by effective mechanisms to monitor and evaluate their implementation;’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
11. Paragraph 18 — part 2 12:19 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 18/2 Part 2: ‘calls on the Commission to explore solutions such as dedicated earmarked funding lines specifically targeting the inclusion of persons with disabilities, to guarantee that sufficient resources are allocated to their rights and inclusion;’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
12. Separate vote: paragraph 20 12:20 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 20 Separate vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
13. Paragraph 23 — part 1 12:20 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 23/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and dedicated EU funding’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
14. Paragraph 23 — part 2 12:20 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 23/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
15. Paragraph 24 — part 1 12:20 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 24/1 Part 1: ‘Calls for the European accessibility centre AccessibleEU to be strengthened through the creation of a dedicated permanent regulatory agency to support the implementation and monitoring of accessibility legislation in the EU and to promote a more accessible Europe;’ without the words ‘through the creation of a dedicated permanent regulatory agency’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
16. Paragraph 24 — part 2 12:21 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 24/2 Part 2: ‘through the creation of a dedicated permanent regulatory agency’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
17. Paragraph 24 — part 3 12:21 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 24/3 Part 3: ‘underlines the need to ensure the full and effective implementation of current legislation aimed at promoting the equal participation of persons with disabilities in society, such as the European Accessibility Act, through regular monitoring;’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
18. Separate vote: paragraph 26 12:21 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 26 Separate vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
19. Separate vote: after paragraph 32 After § 32
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Paragraph 47 — part 1 12:21 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 47/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘legislative’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
21. Paragraph 47 — part 2 12:22 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 47/2 Part 2: “that word” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
22. Paragraph 60 — part 1 12:22 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 60/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘EU-funded’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by Renew, S&D
Adopted
23. Paragraph 60 — part 2 12:22 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 60/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by Renew, S&D
Adopted
24. Paragraph 63 — part 1 12:22 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 63/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘paid and’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
25. Paragraph 63 — part 2 12:22 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 63/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
26. Paragraph 68 — part 1 12:23 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 68/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including mandatory training for employers on disability inclusion, mental health, reasonable accommodations and anti-harassment protocols;’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
27. Paragraph 68 — part 2 12:23 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 68/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
28. Paragraph 77 — part 1 12:23 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 77/1 Part 1: ‘Recognises the vital importance of integrating mental health considerations in all policy areas;’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
29. Paragraph 77 — part 2 12:23 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 77/2 Part 2: ‘acknowledges that persons with disabilities face significantly higher rates of mental distress compared to persons without disabilities; calls on the Commission to systematically take this into account in the forthcoming EU strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities and to mainstream mental health support across all relevant policies and programmes;’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
30. Paragraph 86 — part 1 of 2 § 86 Part 1: ‘Calls on the Commission to issue a recommendation that all Member States align their national laws with the UNCRPD;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
31. Paragraph 86 — part 2 of 2 § 86 Part 2: ‘calls for the EU and the remaining Member States who have not yet done so to ratify the UNCRPD Optional Protocol to allow for an individual complaints mechanism and better monitoring of the UNCRPD’s implementation;’ Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
32. Amendment 1 12:24 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 87 – Am 1 Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
33. Paragraph 87 — part 1 of 2 § 87 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘stresses that the objectives of the Child Guarantee cannot be achieved without an ambitious dedicated budget at both EU and national level and reiterates in this context its call for a dedicated budget of at least EUR 20 billion for the European Child Guarantee;’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
34. Paragraph 87 — part 2 of 2 § 87 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
35. Paragraph 90 — part 1 12:24 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 90/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘sexual and reproductive healthcare,’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by Renew, S&D
Adopted
36. Paragraph 90 — part 2 12:24 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – § 90/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by Renew, S&D
Adopted
37. Paragraph 96 — part 1 of 2 § 96 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including sexual and reproductive healthcare,’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
38. Paragraph 96 — part 2 of 2 § 96 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
39. Separate vote: after paragraph 116 After § 116
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
40. Separate vote: after paragraph 116 After § 116
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
41. Final vote — text as a whole 12:25 A10-0211/2025 – Rosa Estaràs Ferragut – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
9

Application of the Treaty provisions related to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the role of national parliaments in the EU legislative process

Committee report by Marieke Ehlers · voted 12:26–12:27

📄 Report A-10-2025-0224 Full procedure 2025/2042
Adopted Adopted by a clear majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 337 Against 245 Abstained 12

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:27 · 57% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✗
  • Renew ✗
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D and Renew.

How the vote unfolded · 2 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected).

Roll call requested by S&D.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 2 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 1 12:26 A10-0224/2025 – Marieke Ehlers – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
2. Final vote — text as a whole 12:27 A10-0224/2025 – Marieke Ehlers – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
10

Escalation of the war and the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:28–12:34

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0533 Full procedure 2025/2984
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 503 Against 32 Abstained 52

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:34 · 86% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and ESN; PfE mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 38 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 25 amendments (4 adopted, 21 rejected) and 5 parts of the text voted on separately (5 adopted). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, PfE, ESN · split votes by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 38 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 24 12:28 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 1 – Am 24
Adopted
2. Amendment 17 12:28 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 9 – Am 17
Rejected
3. Amendment 18 12:28 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 9 – Am 18 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
4. Amendment 9 12:28 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 9 – Am 9
Rejected
5. Amendment 10 12:29 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 9 – Am 10
Rejected
6. Amendment 11 12:29 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 9 – Am 11
Rejected
7. Amendment 12 12:29 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 9 – Am 12
Adopted
8. Amendment 13 12:29 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 9 – Am 13
Rejected
9. Amendment 14 12:29 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 9 – Am 14
Rejected
10. Amendment 15 12:30 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 9 – Am 15 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
11. Amendment 19 12:30 RC-B10-0533/2025 – § 10 – Am 19
Adopted
12. Amendment 25 12:30 RC-B10-0533/2025 – § 10 – Am 25
Rejected
13. Amendment 4 12:30 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 19 – Am 4
Rejected
14. Amendment 26 12:30 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 19 – Am 26
Rejected
15. Amendment 27 12:31 RC-B10-0533/2025 – § 20 – Am 27 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
16. Amendment 5 12:31 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 21 – Am 5 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
17. Separate vote: after paragraph 25 After § 25
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
18. Paragraph 22 — part 1 of 2 § 22 Part 1: ‘Demands that the perpetrators of all criminal actions against the Sudanese people be held to account without delay; calls for the EU and the Member States to support’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
19. Paragraph 22 — part 2 12:31 RC-B10-0533/2025 – § 22/2 Part 2: ‘the expansion of the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction to the whole of Sudan,’ Split vote requested by PfE
Adopted
20. Paragraph 22 — part 2 of 2 § 22 Part 2: ‘the expansion of the International Criminal Court’s jurisdiction to the whole of Sudan,’ Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
21. Paragraph 22 — part 4 12:32 RC-B10-0533/2025 – § 22/4 Part 4: ‘and the bringing of national proceedings under universal jurisdiction;’ Split vote requested by PfE
Adopted
22. Amendments 2 + 20 (voted as one) 12:32 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After § 26 – Am 2= 20= Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
23. Amendment 6 12:32 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After recital A – Am 6 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
24. Amendment 7 12:32 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After recital B – Am 7
Rejected
25. Amendment 8 12:32 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After recital B – Am 8
Rejected
26. Amendment 3 12:33 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After recital D – Am 3 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
27. Amendment 21 12:33 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After recital D – Am 21 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
28. Amendment 22 12:33 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After recital E – Am 22
Rejected
29. Amendment 23 12:33 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After recital E – Am 23
Rejected
30. Amendment 16 12:33 RC-B10-0533/2025 – After recital F – Am 16 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, S&D
Rejected
31. Final vote — text as a whole 12:34 RC-B10-0533/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew, PPE
Adopted
32. Alternative motion B10-0517/2025 B10-0517/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
33. Alternative motion B10-0519/2025 B10-0519/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
34. Alternative motion B10-0533/2025 B10-0533/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
35. Alternative motion B10-0539/2025 B10-0539/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
36. Alternative motion B10-0540/2025 B10-0540/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
37. Alternative motion B10-0542/2025 B10-0542/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
38. Alternative motion B10-0543/2025 B10-0543/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
11

Political situation in Myanmar including the humanitarian crisis of the Rohingya

Motion for a resolution · voted at 12:34

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0513 Full procedure 2025/2986
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 519 Against 3 Abstained 57

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:34 · 90% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN –
  • NI –

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; ESN mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 8 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by S&D, Renew.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 8 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 1 12:34 RC-B10-0508/2025 – After § 19 – Am 1 Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
2. Final vote — text as a whole 12:34 RC-B10-0508/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
3. Alternative motion B10-0508/2025 B10-0508/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
4. Alternative motion B10-0510/2025 B10-0510/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5. Alternative motion B10-0513/2025 B10-0513/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
6. Alternative motion B10-0516/2025 B10-0516/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
7. Alternative motion B10-0521/2025 B10-0521/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
8. Alternative motion B10-0523/2025 B10-0523/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
12

EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:35–12:40

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0547 Full procedure 2025/3001
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 401 Against 70 Abstained 90

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:40 · 71% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left –
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by ESN; The Left and PfE mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 37 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 14 amendments (14 rejected) and 15 parts of the text voted on separately (15 adopted). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, S&D, Renew, PPE, PfE · split votes by The Left, ECR (2), PfE (3).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 37 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 3 12:35 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After § 1 – Am 3 Roll call requested by S&D, PfE
Rejected
2. Amendment 6 12:35 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After § 1 – Am 6 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
3. Amendment 7 12:35 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After § 1 – Am 7 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
4. Amendment 8 12:35 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After § 1 – Am 8 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
5. Amendment 9 12:35 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After § 1 – Am 9 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
6. Amendment 10 12:36 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After § 1 – Am 10 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
7. Amendment 11 12:36 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After § 1 – Am 11 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
8. Amendment 12 12:36 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After § 1 – Am 12 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
9. Amendment 2 12:36 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 2 – Am 2 Roll call requested by S&D, PfE
Rejected
10. Amendment 13 12:36 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 2 – Am 13 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
11. Paragraph 2 — part 1 12:37 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 2/1 Part 1: ‘Notes the US administration’s efforts towards ending Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine,’ Split vote requested by ECR, PfE
Adopted
12. Paragraph 2 — part 1 of 2 § 2 Part 1: ‘Notes the US administration’s efforts towards ending Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine,’ Split vote requested by ECR, PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
13. Paragraph 2 — part 2 of 2 § 2 Part 2: ‘but considers that US policy ambivalence towards Ukraine is detrimental to the objective of achieving sustainable peace;’ Split vote requested by ECR, PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Amendment 14 12:37 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After § 2 – Am 14 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
15. Separate vote: paragraph 4 12:37 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 4 Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
16. Separate vote: paragraph 5 § 5 Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
17. Paragraph 5 — part 2 12:38 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 5/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE
Adopted
18. Separate vote: paragraph 6 12:38 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 6 Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
19. Paragraph 7 — part 1 12:38 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 7/1 Part 1: ‘Calls on the Member States to adopt and implement, without further delay, a legally and financially sound ‘reparation loan’ to Ukraine, backed by the frozen Russian assets;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
20. Paragraph 7 — part 2 12:38 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 7/2 Part 2: ‘stresses that the fate and conditions of investment of these assets are not a matter for negotiation without the EU;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
21. Paragraph 8 — part 1 12:39 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 8/1 Part 1: ‘Recalls its position that the temporarily occupied Ukrainian territory will not be legally recognised by the EU and its Member States as Russian territory; highlights, moreover, that as part of robust international security guarantees and in order to prevent any future violations of Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, a robust international peacekeeping and observation mission should be deployed with a UN Security Council mandate on both sides of the line of contact;’ Split vote requested by The Left · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
22. Paragraph 8 — part 2 12:39 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 8/2 Part 2: ‘reiterates, given the current volatile security situation in Europe, the importance of maintaining a NATO and US military presence along the eastern flank as crucial for securing the region’s stability;’ Split vote requested by The Left · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
23. Paragraph 8 — part 3 12:39 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 8/3 Part 3: ‘emphasises that if a just peace is achieved between Ukraine and Russia, the EU, its Member States, the United States and like-minded partners will have a crucial role to play in guaranteeing its implementation;’ Split vote requested by The Left · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
24. Separate vote: paragraph 10 12:39 RC-B10-0545/2025 – § 10 Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
25. Amendment 4 12:40 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After § 11 – Am 4 Roll call requested by S&D, PfE
Rejected
26. Recital A — part 1 of 2 Recital A Part 1: ‘whereas the EU’s goal remains a just and lasting peace that is grounded in international law and fully respects Ukraine’s territorial integrity, independence and sovereignty; whereas Russia consistently shows no interest in peace and continues to attack Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
27. Recital A — part 2 of 2 Recital A Part 2: ‘whereas the initiative to end the war in Ukraine recently endorsed by the US administration has raised legitimate concerns regarding the United States’ commitment to international law and the security of Europe and Ukraine;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
28. Amendment 5 12:40 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After recital A – Am 5 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
29. Amendment 1 12:40 RC-B10-0545/2025 – After recital B – Am 1 Roll call requested by S&D, PfE
Rejected
30. Final vote — text as a whole 12:40 RC-B10-0545/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by PPE, Renew
Adopted
31. Alternative motion B10-0544/2025 B10-0544/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
32. Alternative motion B10-0545/2025 B10-0545/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
33. Alternative motion B10-0546/2025 B10-0546/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
34. Alternative motion B10-0547/2025 B10-0547/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
35. Alternative motion B10-0548/2025 B10-0548/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
36. Alternative motion B10-0549/2025 B10-0549/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
37. Alternative motion B10-0550/2025 B10-0550/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
13

Organisational mismanagement of the European personnel selection office (EPSO) competitions

Motion for a resolution

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0497 Full procedure 2025/2880
Adopted Adopted

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Final vote on the motion for a resolution — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.