Parliament adopted a resolution on the findings and recommendations of its Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield, which examined how the Union can better defend its democratic foundations against foreign information manipulation and interference, hybrid operations and disinformation. By adopting the text, Parliament made it its official position, meaning it now states where it stands on the threats described and on the reforms it says are needed. The report calls for a more operational European Centre for Democratic Resilience, stronger enforcement of EU legislation in the digital sphere, a more ambitious European Cooperation Network on Elections, and election-related infrastructure to be treated as critical infrastructure. It also asks for hybrid-threat preparedness in CSDP missions and operations, a review of sanctions instruments, support for media and civil society, and funding under the next multiannual financial framework 2028-2034.
How the vote unfolded · 139 ballots
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 61 amendments (2 adopted, 59 rejected) and 77 parts of the text voted on separately (42 adopted, 35 rejected).
Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, ECR, PfE, ESN · split votes by The Left, PPE (3), ESN (12).
adoptedrejectedlapsedsquare = amendmentcircle = part of the textdecisive voteSolid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions
All 139 ballots in voting order
1.Amendment 27 to paragraph 113:35A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 1 – Am 27A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
5.Amendment 88, adding text after paragraph 213:36A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 2 – Am 88A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
6.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
9.Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 413:36A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 4 – Am 58A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
10.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
11.Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 413:37A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 4 – Am 60A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
12.Separate vote on paragraph 5
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
13.Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 513:37A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 5 – Am 57A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by Renew
Adopted
14.Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 613:37A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 6 – Am 15A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Rejected
15.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
16.Paragraph 9 — part 113:37A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 9/1Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘considers that the establishment of the Centre as a permanent structure by a legal act would represent a qualitative shift from fragmented coordination towards a more integrated, operational and strategic EU-level capacity;’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN, PfE
Adopted
17.Paragraph 9 — part 213:38A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 9/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN, PfE
Adopted
18.Separate vote on paragraph 1213:38A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 12A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
21.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
22.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
23.Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 1313:38A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 13 – Am 65A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
24.Separate vote on paragraph 15A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
25.Paragraph 15 — part 213:39A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 15/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
26.Separate vote on paragraph 1713:39A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 17A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
32.Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 2413:40A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 24 – Am 16A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
34.Paragraph 27 — part 1 of 3Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘without abolishing anonymity’ and ‘stresses that measures targeting inauthentic accounts must not undermine the ability to remain anonymous online, which is essential for protecting journalists, activists, marginalised communities and individuals in vulnerable situations (such as whistle-blowers, dissidents and political opponents of autocratic regimes), and should continue to allow space for satirical and humorous accounts;’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
35.Paragraph 27 — part 2 of 3Part 2: ‘without abolishing anonymity’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
36.Paragraph 27 — part 3 of 3Part 3: ‘stresses that measures targeting inauthentic accounts must not undermine the ability to remain anonymous online, which is essential for protecting journalists, activists, marginalised communities and individuals in vulnerable situations (such as whistle-blowers, dissidents and political opponents of autocratic regimes), and should continue to allow space for satirical and humorous accounts;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
39.Separate vote on paragraph 3013:41A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 30A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
40.Separate vote on paragraph 32A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
41.Paragraph 32 — part 213:42A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 32/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
42.Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 3213:42A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 32 – Am 17A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Rejected
43.Separate vote on paragraph 34A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
44.Paragraph 34 — part 213:42A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 34/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
49.Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 4213:43A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 42 – Am 19A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Rejected
50.Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 4413:43A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 44 – Am 20A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Rejected
51.Separate vote on paragraph 4713:43A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 47A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN, PfE
Adopted
52.Amendment 92 to paragraph 4813:43A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 48 – Am 92A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
53.Separate vote on paragraph 4813:44A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 48A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
59.Separate vote on paragraph 50A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
60.Paragraph 50 — part 213:45A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 50/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
67.Amendment 82 to paragraph 6513:46A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 65 – Am 82A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
68.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 77
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
69.Separate vote on paragraph 78
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
75.Amendment 51 to paragraph 80 — part 113:47A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 80 – Am 51/1Part 1: ‘Strongly condemns the instrumentalisation of migration by third countries or hostile non-state actors with the aim of destabilising a Member State or the EU; takes the position that this phenomenon constitutes an unacceptable attempt to exert political pressure on front-line Member States and on the EU; urges the Commission to propose further legislation enabling Member States, in cases of instrumentalisation, to refuse access to asylum procedures at the external border, in accordance with EU and international law; notes the specific provisions on the instrumentalisation of migration recently included in key pieces of EU legislation; further welcomes the recent revision of the EU legal framework to include hybrid threats among the grounds triggering the EU visa suspension mechanism; underlines that a credible and effective EU response must also be based on close coordination and sincere cooperation between neighbouring Member States, and between them and EU institutions, in a spirit of loyalty and mutual solidarity, and on enhanced technological and operational capabilities in border management, while preserving the integrity of the Schengen area and ensuring full respect for the fundamental values of the EU;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
Rejected
76.Amendment 51 to paragraph 80 — part 213:47A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 80 – Am 51/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
Rejected
77.Separate vote on paragraph 80A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
78.Paragraph 80 — part 213:47A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 80/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
82.Separate vote on paragraph 8213:48A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 82A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
83.Separate vote on paragraph 86
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
84.Separate vote on paragraph 87
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
85.Separate vote on paragraph 88
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
86.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 88
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
87.Amendment 94, adding text after paragraph 8813:48A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 88 – Am 94A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
88.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 90
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
91.Paragraph 101 — part 113:49A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 101/1Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘local’, ‘regional’, ‘national’ and ‘and in candidate countries’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
92.Paragraph 101 — part 213:49A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 101/2Part 2: ‘local’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
93.Paragraph 101 — part 313:49A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 101/3Part 3: ‘regional’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
94.Paragraph 101 — part 413:49A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 101/4Part 4: ‘national’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
95.Paragraph 101 — part 513:49A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 101/5Part 5: ‘and in candidate countries’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
100.Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 10413:50A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 104 – Am 9A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
102.Separate vote on paragraph 10813:50A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 108A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
103.Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 113:50A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 110 – Am 25/1Part 1: ‘Reiterates that Members of the European Parliament must act in accordance with the Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by The Left·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Rejected
104.Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 110 — part 213:51A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 110 – Am 25/2Part 2: ‘recommends in this regard that an audit be performed on the general allowance of and all other forms of financial contributions to Members of the European Parliament on a yearly basis in order to increase Parliament’s transparency and trust in its Members among the citizens of the EU as well as reduce the risk of undue influence, interference or corruption;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by The Left·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Rejected
105.Amendment 86 to paragraph 11513:51A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – § 115 – Am 86A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
106.Paragraph 115 — part 1 of 2Part 1: ‘Considers sanctions against individuals and state and non-state entities engaged in actions aimed at undermining the democratic integrity of the EU or its Member States to be an essential component of the European Democracy Shield’s toolbox; further stresses that effective sanctions must be adopted based on objective and consistent criteria and must include a comprehensive set of measures, including asset freezing and confiscation, clear attribution and public exposure, cost increases and revenue cuts, bans on imports and exports, travel bans, the denial of access to EU markets and financial systems, and other effective, robust and impactful restrictive measures;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
107.Paragraph 115 — part 2 of 2Part 2: ‘reiterates its call on the Council to gradually transition to qualified majority voting for decisions in areas of the common foreign and security policy such as sanctions;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
108.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 115
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
109.Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 11513:51A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 115 – Am 55A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Rejected
110.Separate vote on paragraph 116
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
111.Separate vote on paragraph 118
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
112.Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 13213:52A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 132 – Am 72A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
113.Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 13213:52A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After § 132 – Am 73A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
114.Amendment 11, adding text after citation 7013:52A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After citation 70 – Am 11A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Rejected
115.Separate vote on recital B13:52A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital BA vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
116.Separate vote on recital C
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
117.Vote on text inserted after recital C
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
118.Separate vote on recital D
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
119.Separate vote on recital G
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
120.Separate vote on recital JA paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
121.Recital J — part 213:53A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital J/2Part 2: ‘whereas this logic should apply to large information society service providers who benefit from the information ecosystem while simultaneously creating systemic risks to democratic integrity;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
122.Recital O — part 1 of 2Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘as evidenced by the amplification of extremist political content during elections across the EU’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
123.Recital O — part 2 of 2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
124.Recital R — part 1 of 2Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘thereby exposing themselves to risks linked to addictive design, harmful content and manipulative practices’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
125.Recital R — part 2 of 2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
126.Amendment 1, adding text after Recital AB13:53A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After Recital AB – Am 1A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
Rejected
127.Separate vote on recital AU13:53A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital AUA vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
128.Separate vote on recital BC
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
129.Recital BK — part 1 of 2Part 1: ‘whereas fossil-free energy is a crucial stepping stone for Europe’s energy sovereignty;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
130.Recital BK — part 2 of 2Part 2: ‘whereas according to analysis published in 2025 by Wood Mackenzie, 9 of the 10 largest global solar inverter suppliers were based in China; whereas hidden communication devices have been discovered in Chinese-made solar power inverters used in Europe and the United States; whereas according to the Czech cybersecurity office, there are risks regarding data protection and, in extreme cases, remote manipulation of solar inverters; whereas solar power plants interconnected through a decentralised dense network are susceptible to cyberattacks and therefore require adequate cybersecurity safeguards;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
131.Recital BT — part 1 of 2Part 1: ‘whereas Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and China’s assertive geopolitical posture have intensified the use of disinformation, economic coercion and strategic influence, targeting not only the EU, but also vulnerable regions such as the Western Balkans, Eastern Partnership countries and the Global South; whereas various sources reveal that Russia’s annual budget for spreading disinformation and propaganda amounts to several billion euro; whereas Russia’s disinformation warfare has not been matched by the EU with adequate financing or effective strategy; whereas elections and political events across Europe demonstrate persistent, targeted and sophisticated full-scale offensive hybrid warfare perpetrated by Russia, aiming to destabilise trust in European political systems and institutions, and to create constant confusion between facts and false information;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
132.Recital BT — part 2 of 2Part 2: ‘whereas such warfare requires an appropriate response and a shift from a mere defensive strategy to an offensive one;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
133.Recital BT — part 213:54A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital BT/2Part 2: ‘whereas such warfare requires an appropriate response and a shift from a mere defensive strategy to an offensive one;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ESN·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Adopted
134.Amendment 56, adding text after Recital BT13:54A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – After Recital BT – Am 56A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by Renew
Adopted
135.Amendment 78 to recital BZ13:54A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital BZ – Am 78A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
136.Vote on text inserted after recital BZ
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
137.Amendment 80 to recital CL13:55A10-0199/2026 – Tomas Tobé – Recital CL – Am 80A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ECR
Rejected
138.Vote on text inserted after recital CN
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).
Codes in ballot labels
Am 27 — amendment 27
§ 5 — paragraph 5
§ 5/2, part 2 — a A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another., taken in parts
Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
***I — Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council.; *** — Parliament can approve or reject the text, for example an international agreement, but cannot amend it.; * — Parliament gives its opinion on a proposal. The Council decides, but must wait for Parliament’s opinion.
Lapsed — Not put to a vote, because an earlier vote already settled the matter.