Skip to content
Resolution on a topical subject First reading

The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia

A resolution tabled by political groups, usually on an urgent matter or in reaction to a statement by the Commission or Council. Not binding.

Where it stands: Parliament adopted the text on 21 May 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

  1. ✓ Tabled for plenary
  2. ✓ Plenary vote Adopted 21 May 2026
  3. ✓ Parliament’s position Final
How a file moves through Parliament

A file is referred to one lead committee (others may give an opinion). Its rapporteur writes a draft report, committee members table amendments, and the committee votes to adopt the report. The report is then tabled for all MEPs; political groups can table further amendments, which are voted on before the final vote in plenary. The adopted resolution is Parliament’s final position; it is not itself law.

The text, version by version

Adopted by Parliament · latest Adopted text TA10-0187/2026 21 May 2026 ✦ This resolution expresses concern over acid attacks on human rights defender Andrie Yunus and environmental activist Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia, and over the wider repression of defenders, journalists, trade unionists and students.⇄ what changed Tabled for plenary Joint motion RC-B10-0248/2026 20 May 2026 ⇄ what changed Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0264/2026 18 May 2026 ✦ This resolution expresses concern over acid attacks on human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia, and over the broader pattern of violence against such defenders.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0248/2026 18 May 2026 ✦ This resolution condemns attacks on human rights defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi and other violence against defenders in Indonesia, urging Indonesian authorities to investigate and end impunity.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0256/2026 18 May 2026 ✦ Parliament condemns the acid attacks on Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi and calls for prompt, independent investigations into the attacks and the violent repression of the August 2025 demonstrations.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0257/2026 18 May 2026 ✦ This resolution condemns the acid attacks on activists Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia, calls for swift and transparent investigations, and reaffirms the importance of fundamental rights.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0253/2026 18 May 2026 ✦ This resolution condemns acid attacks on human rights defender Andrie Yunus and environmental activist Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia, and calls for thorough investigations and protection for victims.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0250/2026 18 May 2026 ✦ Parliament condemns the acid attacks on human rights defender Andrie Yunus and environmental activist Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia and urges Indonesian authorities to prosecute all perpetrators and ensure independent civilian justice.

Latest Tabled for plenary → Adopted by Parliament: No change of substance: the two versions differ only in presentation — cover page, numbering or the parts a report carries that the adopted text does not. see the changes →

Tabled for plenary → Tabled for plenary: The new version broadens the resolution's scope, adding recitals on civic space and EU partnership, and replaces calls for specific actions with broader demands on investigations, legislation, and EU engagement. It drops references to the August 2025 demonstrations, the military court transfer, and targeted sanctions, instead urging legislative amendments and EU funding for defenders. The changes also rephrase the first recital to include details about the indictment of four intelligence agency members. see the changes →

Newest version first. Open a version to read it in full. “What changed” shows the differences paragraph by paragraph; ✦ lines are AI-written from the texts themselves.

Timeline

  1. Plenary stage
  2. Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority
    For 469 Against 38 Abstained 62

    Final vote — text as a whole at 13:37 · 82% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

    How the vote unfolded · 8 ballots

    adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

    Show all 8 ballots in voting order
    1. Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 13:37 RC-B10-0248/2026 – § 6 – Am 1
    Rejected
    2. Final vote — text as a whole 13:37 RC-B10-0248/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
    Adopted
    3. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0248/2026
    — no individual positions recorded
    4. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0250/2026
    — no individual positions recorded
    5. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0253/2026
    — no individual positions recorded
    6. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0256/2026
    — no individual positions recorded
    7. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0257/2026
    — no individual positions recorded
    8. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0264/2026
    — no individual positions recorded
  3. 20 May 2026 1 amendment tabled for the plenary vote

    Groups propose changes to the tabled text; each is voted on before the final vote.