Skip to content
5 New EU laws ·decision 5 of 22 on Thursday, 26 March 2026

Non-application of customs duties on imports of certain goods

Committee report by Bernd Lange · · voted 11:25–11:26

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 437 for · 144 against · 60 abstained (68 % in favour) Foreign affairsTrade & customsEconomy & single marketTariffs & trade defenceCustomsUnited States & transatlantic

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 437 Against 144 Abstained 60

Final vote at 11:26 · 68% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN –
  • NI ✗

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE and PfE; ESN mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The proposal extends indefinitely the suspension of customs duties on US lobster imports and expands it to processed lobster, as agreed in a joint statement. Parliament adopted its position, supporting the proposal with amendments, including a sunset clause and a change to delegated acts. Parliament calls on the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends its proposal, and to forward the position to the Council and national parliaments.

How the vote unfolded · 5 ballots

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Roll calls requested by The Left, PPE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 5 ballots in voting order
1. Motion for adjournment of vote 11:25 A10-0070/2026 – Bernd Lange – Motion for adjournment of vote
Rejected
2. Proposal to reject the text 11:26 A10-0070/2026 – Bernd Lange – Proposal for rejection – Am 17
Rejected
3. Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Final vote 11:26 A10-0070/2026 – Bernd Lange – Commission proposal
Adopted
5. Referral back to committee Request for referral back (Rule 60(4))
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 26 March 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0070 in procedure 2025/0260.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site