Skip to content
4 New EU laws ·decision 4 of 22 on Thursday, 26 March 2026

Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America

Committee report by Bernd Lange · · voted 11:21–11:24

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 417 for · 154 against · 71 abstained (65 % in favour) Foreign affairsTrade & customsEconomy & single marketUnited States & transatlanticCustomsTariffs & trade defence

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 417 Against 154 Abstained 71

Final vote at 11:24 · 65% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN –
  • NI ✗

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE and PfE; ESN mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The proposal adjusts customs duties and opens tariff quotas for certain goods imported from the United States, implementing commitments from a joint EU-US trade statement. Parliament adopted its position on the law, endorsing the proposal with amendments. Parliament calls on the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends the proposal, and asks for transparency on revenue losses.

How the vote unfolded · 19 ballots

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 14 amendments (14 rejected). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Roll calls requested by The Left, PPE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 19 ballots in voting order
1. Motion for adjournment of vote 11:21 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – Motion for adjournment of vote
Rejected
2. Proposal to reject the text 11:21 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – Proposal for rejection – Am 47
Rejected
3. Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Amendment 61 to Article 3 11:22 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – Article 3 – § 1 – after sub§ 1 – Am 61 requested by The Left
Rejected
5. Amendment 48, adding text after recital 1 11:22 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 1 – Am 48 requested by The Left
Rejected
6. Amendment 49, adding text after recital 1 11:22 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 1 – Am 49 requested by The Left
Rejected
7. Amendment 50, adding text after recital 1 11:22 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 1 – Am 50 requested by The Left
Rejected
8. Amendment 51, adding text after recital 2 11:22 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 2 – Am 51 requested by The Left
Rejected
9. Amendment 52, adding text after recital 2 11:23 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 2 – Am 52 requested by The Left
Rejected
10. Amendment 53, adding text after recital 2 11:23 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 2 – Am 53 requested by The Left
Rejected
11. Amendment 54, adding text after recital 2 11:23 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 2 – Am 54 requested by The Left
Rejected
12. Amendment 55, adding text after recital 2 11:23 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 2 – Am 55 requested by The Left
Rejected
13. Amendment 56, adding text after recital 3 11:23 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 3 – Am 56 requested by The Left
Rejected
14. Amendment 57, adding text after recital 4 11:24 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 4 – Am 57 requested by The Left
Rejected
15. Amendment 58, adding text after recital 4 11:24 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 4 – Am 58 requested by The Left
Rejected
16. Amendment 59, adding text after recital 9 11:24 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 9 – Am 59 requested by The Left
Rejected
17. Amendment 60, adding text after recital 9 11:24 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – After recital 9 – Am 60 requested by The Left
Rejected
18. Final vote 11:24 A10-0069/2026 – Bernd Lange – Commission proposal
Adopted
19. Referral back to committee Request for referral back (Rule 60(4))
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 26 March 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0069 in procedure 2025/0261.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site