Skip to content
Own-initiative report First reading

European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities funded

Parliament sets out its own position on a topic. The resolution is not binding but signals what Parliament wants.

Where it stands: Parliament adopted the text on 16 June 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

  1. ✓ Referred to committee 12 February 2026
  2. ✓ Committee work Report adopted 5 May 2026
  3. ✓ Tabled for plenary 12 May 2026
  4. ✓ Plenary vote Adopted 16 June 2026
  5. ✓ Parliament’s position Final
How a file moves through Parliament

A file is referred to one lead committee (others may give an opinion). Its rapporteur writes a draft report, committee members table amendments, and the committee votes to adopt the report. The report is then tabled for all MEPs; political groups can table further amendments, which are voted on before the final vote in plenary. The adopted resolution is Parliament’s final position; it is not itself law.

Who is working on it

Lead committee
AFCO — Constitutional Affairs
Rapporteurs
Loránt VINCZE PPECharles GOERENS Renew
Shadow rapporteurs
Gabriele BISCHOFF S&DJuan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL PfEPatryk JAKI ECRReinier VAN LANSCHOT Verts/ALEChristine ANDERSON ESN

The rapporteur drafts and negotiates the text for the lead committee; each other political group names a shadow rapporteur to follow the file.

The text, version by version

Latest Tabled for plenary → Adopted by Parliament: The versions differ only in formal points: a typo in a regulation number is corrected. see the changes →

Committee draft → Tabled for plenary: Adds provisions on regulatory burden, simplification, and corrective measures for foundations. Expands funding flexibility by encouraging cooperation, clarifying membership rules, and proposing higher donation caps. Proposes a single online reporting system to reduce administrative burden and improve transparency. Shifts the call from a recast proposal to a review of national frameworks that may hinder payments. Other changes are wording refinements and rephrasing. see the changes →

Newest version first. Open a version to read it in full. “What changed” shows the differences paragraph by paragraph; ✦ lines are AI-written from the texts themselves.

Timeline

  1. Plenary stage
  2. Adopted Adopted by a large majority
    For 426 Against 140 Abstained 107

    Final vote — text as a whole at 13:43 · 63% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

    How the vote unfolded · 18 ballots

    adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

    Show all 18 ballots in voting order
    1. Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 4 13:40 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 4 – Am 10
    Rejected
    2. Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 4 13:40 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 4 – Am 11
    Rejected
    3. Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 5 13:41 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 5 – Am 1
    Rejected
    4. Separate vote on paragraph 6
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    5. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 16
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    6. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 16
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    7. Amendment 14 to paragraph 20 13:41 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 20 – Am 14
    Rejected
    8. Separate vote on paragraph 20 13:41 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 20
    Adopted
    9. Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 13:41 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 20 – Am 5
    Rejected
    10. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 20
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    11. Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 13:42 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 20 – Am 7
    Rejected
    12. Separate vote on paragraph 21 13:42 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 21
    Adopted
    13. Amendment 8 to paragraph 22 13:42 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 22 – Am 8
    Rejected
    14. Separate vote on paragraph 22 13:42 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 22
    Adopted
    15. Separate vote on recital A
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    16. Amendment 2 to recital A 13:42 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – Recital A – Am 2
    Rejected
    17. Amendment 3, adding text after recital A 13:43 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After recital A – Am 3
    Rejected
    18. Final vote — text as a whole 13:43 A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
    Adopted
  3. 9 June – 10 June 2026 14 amendments tabled for the plenary vote

    Groups propose changes to the tabled text; each is voted on before the final vote.

  4. 12 May 2026 Report tabled for plenary

    This is the text all MEPs vote on. Political groups can still table amendments to it.

  5. Committee stage
  6. 5 May 2026 Committee vote: report adopted

    AFCO (Constitutional Affairs) voted on the amendments and adopted the report that goes to plenary.

  7. 27 March 2026 Amendments tabled in committee

    Members of AFCO (Constitutional Affairs) proposed changes to the draft.

  8. 11 March 2026 Draft report published

    The rapporteur’s first text in AFCO (Constitutional Affairs). Members can table amendments before the committee votes.

  9. 12 February 2026 Referred to the AFCO (Constitutional Affairs) committee

    The lead committee prepares Parliament’s report.