Skip to content

Theme · Agreement

EU-Mercosur agreement

Ongoing trade negotiations and ratification of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and its interim trade deal.

No decision on this story in the last six months.

7 subjects in 6 sittings · 4 adopted, 3 rejected · Oct 2025 – Feb 2026

New laws 2Resolutions 5

Also known as: EU–Mercosur agreement · EU–Mercosur Agreement

A theme is a story Parliament keeps returning to — a war, a crisis, one country, an agreement — found by reading the decisions. Topics are the fixed policy fields every decision is sorted into; themes cut across them. All themes →

Latest decisions

  1. Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products

    Parliament adopted its position on a proposed EU law implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products. The law aims to protect sensitive EU agricultural sectors by allowing swift, proportionate safeguard measures when imports from Mercosur countries cause or threaten serious injury to EU producers. Parliament's position includes amendments to the Commission's proposal, and it calls on the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially changes the text.

    Agriculture, food & fisheriesForeign affairsTrade & customs

    10 Feb 2026 · New laws · report by Gabriel Mato · 1st reading · 30 ballots · voted 13:02 · A-10-2025-0254 · 2025/0322

  2. Motion of censure on the Commission

    The motion sought to censure the Commission over its handling of the EU-Mercosur trade agreement and agricultural policy. Parliament rejected the motion, meaning the Commission keeps its position and no further action follows from this text. The motion's supporters argued the Commission bypassed parliaments and harmed European farmers.

    Trade & customsAgriculture, food & fisheries

    22 Jan 2026 · Resolutions · motion for a resolution · voted 12:02 · B-10-2026-0063 · 2026/2002

  3. Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)

    Parliament adopted a resolution asking the Court of Justice of the European Union for an opinion on whether the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and Interim Trade Agreement are compatible with the Treaties. The Partnership Agreement is a mixed agreement needing unanimous Council approval, Parliament's consent and ratification by all member states, while the Interim Trade Agreement covers only areas of exclusive EU competence and needs a qualified majority in the Council and Parliament's consent. By adopting this text, Parliament makes it its official position to seek the Court's assessment of these agreements.

    Trade & customsForeign affairsEconomy & single market

    21 Jan 2026 · Resolutions · motion for a resolution · 2 ballots · voted 12:48 · B-10-2026-0060 · 2026/2560

  4. Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products

    Parliament adopted its position on a proposed EU law implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products. The law aims to protect sensitive EU agricultural sectors by allowing swift, proportionate measures when imports from Mercosur countries cause or threaten serious injury to EU producers. Parliament asks the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends its proposal, and to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and national parliaments.

    Agriculture, food & fisheriesForeign affairsTrade & customs

    16 Dec 2025 · New laws · report by Gabriel Mato · 1st reading · 70 ballots · voted 12:46 · A-10-2025-0254 · 2025/0322

  5. Motion of censure on the Commission

    The European Parliament voted on a motion of censure against the European Commission, which would have expressed Parliament's lack of confidence in the Commission. Parliament rejected the motion, meaning the Commission keeps its position and no further action is taken on this censure. The motion had been tabled by MEPs citing concerns about the Commission's policies and conduct.

    EU institutions & Parliament

    9 Oct 2025 · Resolutions · motion for a resolution · voted 13:09 · B-10-2025-0400 · 2025/2174

  6. Motion of censure on the Commission

    The motion of censure criticised the Commission over an EU–US trade deal, the EU–Mercosur Agreement, the situation in Gaza, and social and climate crises. Parliament rejected the motion, meaning the Commission keeps its confidence and remains in office. The motion had called for the Commission's resignation and for suspending the EU–Israel Association Agreement.

    EU institutions & Parliament

    9 Oct 2025 · Resolutions · motion for a resolution · voted 13:10 · B-10-2025-0402 · 2025/2173

  7. EU political strategy on Latin America

    Parliament adopted a resolution setting out its political strategy for relations with Latin America and the Caribbean. The text calls for stronger diplomatic, economic and security ties, and highlights the Global Gateway initiative and the EU-Mercosur Agreement. It also urges a united EU stance on foreign policy, including condemning actions by regimes in Nicaragua, Cuba and Venezuela.

    Foreign affairs

    8 Oct 2025 · Resolutions · report by Davor Ivo Stier · 5 ballots · voted 14:02 · A-10-2025-0171 · 2025/2083

Dossiers involved · latest vote first

  1. 2025/0322 Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products 10 Feb 2026 · 2 votes
  2. 2026/2002 Motion of censure on the Commission 22 Jan 2026 · 1 vote
  3. 2026/2560 Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) 21 Jan 2026 · 1 vote
  4. 2025/2173 Motion of censure on the Commission 9 Oct 2025 · 1 vote
  5. 2025/2174 Motion of censure on the Commission 9 Oct 2025 · 1 vote
  6. 2025/2083 EU political strategy on Latin America 8 Oct 2025 · 1 vote

Who backs what

How each group's majority voted on the 7 most recent final votes about EU-Mercosur agreement.

With the result = share of these votes where the group's position matched the outcome (For an adopted text, Against a rejected one). The other columns count the votes by the group's position; Split = no position had a majority among its members. Non-attached members have no group line.

GroupWith the resultForAgainstAbstainedSplit
29 %3310
100 %4300
86 %3400
86 %3400
86 %3400
29 %3220
14 %3310
43 %6100

The latest final votes, group by group

Each group's majority position: For, Against, Abstained, or Split. — = the group did not vote.

Decision
Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products 10 Feb 2026 · adoptedAbstainedForForForForForAgainstFor
Motion of censure on the Commission 22 Jan 2026 · rejectedForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstForForFor
Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) 21 Jan 2026 · adoptedForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstForFor
Bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products 16 Dec 2025 · adoptedAgainstForForForForAbstainedAgainstFor
Motion of censure on the Commission 9 Oct 2025 · rejectedAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstForForFor
Motion of censure on the Commission 9 Oct 2025 · rejectedForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainstAbstainedFor
EU political strategy on Latin America 8 Oct 2025 · adoptedAgainstForForForForAbstainedAgainstAgainst

✦ This theme was found by a model reading the decisions; the list of decisions, the counts and the group lines are computed from the record. Wrongly filed decisions can be reported to the site's maintainer.