Skip to content

← 20 January 22 January →

Plenary sitting, Wednesday, 21 January 2026

8 decisions: 8 adopted. 379 ballots in all, 117 by , between 12:48 and 13:48.

Tightest result: Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) — adopted 334 to 324.

✦ The day in brief · AI briefing

Parliament adopted new laws on air passenger rights and gave consent to international agreements, while rejecting a request for a Court opinion on the EU-Mercosur deal.

New EU laws · 1

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

  1. Decision 1:Air passenger rights

    Committee report by Andrey Novakov ·

    The position aims to preserve existing passenger rights, simplify claims, and extend the rules to more flights, while capping airline costs for hotel stays in extraordinary circumstances.

    Adopted by an overwhelming majority 632 for · 15 against · 9 abstained

    Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

Resolutions & reports · 5

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

  1. Decision 4:Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)

    Motion for a resolution · 2 ballots

    The Partnership Agreement is a mixed agreement needing unanimous Council approval, Parliament's consent and ratification by all member states, while the Interim Trade Agreement covers only areas of exclusive EU competence and needs a qualified majority in the Council and Parliament's consent.

    Adopted narrowly 334 for · 324 against · 11 abstained

    Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, PfE and ESN; opposed by S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR.

  2. Decision 5:Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

    Committee report by David McAllister · 166 ballots, incl. 35 amendments

    The report evaluates progress and challenges of the CFSP and provides guidance for the EU executive, emphasizing principles such as shaping the rules-based international order and increasing the impact of EU external action.

    Adopted by a clear majority 392 for · 179 against · 83 abstained

    Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by The Left, PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

  3. Decision 6:Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2025

    Committee report by Thijs Reuten · 98 ballots, incl. 17 amendments

    The report calls for strengthening the European defence industry, enhancing military capabilities, and improving cooperation among member states.

    Adopted by a clear majority 395 for · 197 against · 70 abstained

    Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by The Left, PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

  4. Decision 7:Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025

    Committee report by Francisco Assis · 109 ballots, incl. 27 amendments

    The report assesses global trends and EU tools, and feeds into preparations for a new EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy after 2027.

    Adopted by a large majority 421 for · 120 against · 108 abstained

    Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

  5. Decision 8:Addressing impunity through EU sanctions, including the EU Global Human Rights sanctions regime (so-called ‘EU Magnitsky Act’)

    Committee report by Antonio López-Istúriz White

    The text calls for a more coherent and strategic use of the regime, including an impact assessment, better alignment with international partners, improved enforcement, and enhanced transparency and accountability.

    Adopted by a large majority 440 for · 127 against · 59 abstained

    Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

✦ AI: one-sentence summaries written by an AI from the text voted on; the outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Each decision’s page shows every ballot, the full text and the procedure.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

All the terms used on this site