Skip to content
4 Resolutions & reports ·decision 4 of 8 on Wednesday, 21 January 2026

Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA)

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:48–12:49

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted narrowly 334 for · 324 against · 11 abstained (50 % in favour) Trade & customsForeign affairsEconomy & single marketTrade agreementsLatin America

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted narrowly

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 334 Against 324 Abstained 11

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 12:48 · 50% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✗
  • Renew ✗
  • PPE ✗
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, PfE and ESN; opposed by S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted a resolution asking the Court of Justice of the European Union for an opinion on whether the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and Interim Trade Agreement are compatible with the Treaties. The Partnership Agreement is a mixed agreement needing unanimous Council approval, Parliament's consent and ratification by all member states, while the Interim Trade Agreement covers only areas of exclusive EU competence and needs a qualified majority in the Council and Parliament's consent. By adopting this text, Parliament makes it its official position to seek the Court's assessment of these agreements.

How the vote unfolded · 2 ballots

Roll calls requested by The Left, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 2 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote on the motion for a resolution 12:48 B10-0060/2026 – Motion for a resolution requested by The Left, PfE
Adopted
2. Final vote on the motion for a resolution 12:49 B10-0061/2026 – Motion for a resolution requested by The Left, PfE
Rejected

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 21 January 2026. The vote was taken on Motion B-10-2026-0060 in procedure 2026/2560.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site