Skip to content
1 New EU laws ·decision 1 of 9 on Tuesday, 6 October 2026

Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE)

Committee report by Tonino Picula, Ivars Ijabs · · voted 13:32–13:33

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 536 for · 101 against · 16 abstained (82 % in favour) Defence & securityEU budget & fundsDefence industry & procurementEU security & defence policy

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 536 Against 101 Abstained 16

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 13:33 · 82% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by The Left and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The proposal would set up the Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE), a new programme to give rapid, agile and targeted support to small and medium-sized enterprises, including innovative start-ups and scaleups, to develop innovative defence solutions. Parliament adopted its position on the law at first reading, which means MEPs have set out where they stand and will need to agree with the Council before the law is final. Parliament calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal, and instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

How the vote unfolded · 29 ballots

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 25 parts of the text voted on separately (25 lapsed).

Roll calls requested by The Left, ESN · separate votes by ESN.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 29 ballots in voting order
1. Proposal to reject the text 13:32 A10-0188/2026 – Tonino Picula, Ivars Ijabs – Proposal for rejection – Am 3
Rejected
2. Final vote on the provisional agreement 13:33 A10-0188/2026 – Tonino Picula, Ivars Ijabs – Provisional agreement – Am 2
Adopted
3. Final vote Text as a whole
— no individual positions recorded
5. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
6. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
7. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
8. Separate vote on Article 4, paragraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
10. Separate vote on Article 5, paragraph 2
— no individual positions recorded
11. Separate vote on Article 7, paragraph 2, point a
— no individual positions recorded
12. Separate vote on Article 7, after paragraph 2
— no individual positions recorded
13. Separate vote on Article 7, after paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
16. Separate vote on Article 10, paragraph 1, point c
— no individual positions recorded
17. Separate vote on Article 10, paragraph 1, point c
— no individual positions recorded
18. Separate vote on Article 15, after paragraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
19. Separate vote on Article 15, paragraph 4
— no individual positions recorded
20. Separate vote on Article 15, paragraph 4
— no individual positions recorded
21. Separate vote on Article 15, paragraph 6
— no individual positions recorded
22. Separate vote on Article 16, paragraph 4 (corresponds to Article 16, paragraph 5 in Amendment 2)
— no individual positions recorded
24. Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 3 (corresponds to Article 17, paragraph 4 in Amendment 2)
— no individual positions recorded
25. Separate vote on Article 18
— no individual positions recorded
26. Separate vote on Article 18
— no individual positions recorded
29. Final vote Commission proposal

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 6 October 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0188 in procedure 2026/0078.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site