Parliament adopted a resolution on addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries to protect workers' rights. The text calls for measures to prevent labour exploitation, improve enforcement, and ensure accountability in subcontracting and labour intermediation. It emphasizes the need for a coordinated European response to combat abusive practices and protect workers and legitimate businesses.
How the vote unfolded · 15 ballots
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (3 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (4 adopted, 7 rejected).
Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, S&D, Members · split votes by Members (4) · separate votes by Members.
adoptedrejectedlapsedsquare = amendmentcircle = part of the textdecisive voteSolid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions
All 15 ballots in voting order
1.Separate vote on paragraph 312:25A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 3A paragraph voted on its own, usually so a group can vote against just that part. requested by Members·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D, Verts/ALE
Rejected
2.Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 312:25A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – After § 3 – Am 1A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by Members
Rejected
3.Paragraph 4 — part 112:25A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 4/1Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to consider introducing a well-defined regime for the joint and several liability of economic operators and subcontractors and for ensuring transparency regarding the subcontractors involved and the share of the contract that the contractor intends to subcontract’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Members·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Adopted
4.Paragraph 4 — part 212:26A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 4/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Members·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
5.Paragraph 8 — part 112:26A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 8/1Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to include relevant proposals favouring direct employment relationships in its upcoming quality jobs act;’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Members·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Adopted
6.Paragraph 8 — part 212:26A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 8/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Members·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
7.Paragraph 11 — part 112:26A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 11/1Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to propose a framework to limit subcontracting chains with a focus on addressing issues in high-risk sectors;’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Members·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D, Verts/ALE
Adopted
8.Paragraph 11 — part 212:26A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 11/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Members·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D, Verts/ALE
Rejected
9.Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 1112:27A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – After § 11 – Am 3A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by Members
Rejected
10.Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1412:27A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – After § 14 – Am 2A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by Members
Rejected
11.Paragraph 19 — part 112:27A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 19/1Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Stresses the need for a minimum EU framework under which labour intermediaries operate in order to strengthen their accountability, transparency obligations and compliance with minimum requirements and quality standards, as stipulated by ILO Convention No 181 on Private Employment Agencies;’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Members·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Adopted
12.Paragraph 19 — part 212:27A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 19/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Members·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
13.Separate vote on recital N12:28A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – Recital NA paragraph voted on its own, usually so a group can vote against just that part. requested by Members·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
14.Separate vote on recital O12:28A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – Recital OA paragraph voted on its own, usually so a group can vote against just that part. requested by Members·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).
Codes in ballot labels
Am 27 — amendment 27
§ 5 — paragraph 5
§ 5/2, part 2 — a A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another., taken in parts
Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
***I — Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council.; *** — Parliament can approve or reject the text, for example an international agreement, but cannot amend it.; * — Parliament gives its opinion on a proposal. The Council decides, but must wait for Parliament’s opinion.
Lapsed — Not put to a vote, because an earlier vote already settled the matter.