← 11 February 24 February →

Plenary sitting, Thursday, 12 February 2026

MEPs decided on 11 subjects between 12:12 and 12:56 — 11 adopted. That took 234 ballots, 142 of them by roll call with every MEP’s position recorded.

11
subjects decided
11 / 0
adopted / rejected
234
ballots, incl. 49 amendments
142
roll calls (per-MEP record)
New here? How plenary voting works and how to read this page

A sitting is one day of voting in the Parliament’s plenary. Everything voted that day is listed here by subject — a report, resolution, agreement or objection the Parliament is deciding on. Subjects are sorted into sections by what kind of decision they are (new laws, international agreements, non-binding resolutions, …); each section explains what “adopted” means there.

Each subject can involve many ballots. MEPs first vote on amendments (proposed changes) and on parts of the text a group asked to vote on separately, then hold the decisive vote on the whole text — that is the result shown at the top of every subject. The strip of squares and circles under it shows all the ballots in the order they were taken; open the list to see each one.

Only roll-call votes record how each MEP voted — click one to see every individual position and the full breakdown by political group. The row of group badges (✓ mostly for, ✗ mostly against, – mostly abstained, ~ split) shows which groups backed a result. Votes by show of hands record only the outcome.

Every subject is based on a document (a committee report, a motion for a resolution, or a Council/Commission text) and belongs to a procedure — the full legislative file that can span years. The buttons on each subject take you to both.

Glossary: Am 27 = amendment 27 · § 5 = paragraph 5 · part 1/2 = a paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts (a split vote) · separate vote = a paragraph voted on its own, usually so a group can vote against it · = joins identical amendments voted together · 1st reading (***I) = Parliament’s first pass at a proposed law · Lapsed = fell away without a vote because an earlier vote settled the matter.

New EU laws

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

1

Cooperation among enforcement authorities regarding unfair trading practices in the agri-food supply chain

Committee report by Stefano Bonaccini · 1st reading · voted at 12:19

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 555 Against 0 Abstained 26

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 12:19 · 96% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; ESN mostly abstained.

Resolutions & reports

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

2

Post-election situation in Uganda and threats against opposition leader Bobi Wine

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:12–12:13

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 514 Against 3 Abstained 56

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:13 · 90% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; ESN mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 11 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 4 parts of the text voted on separately (4 adopted). 5 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by Renew, PfE, ESN · split votes by ECR, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 11 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 1 12:12 RC-B10-0121/2026 – § 5 – Am 1 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
2. Paragraph 5 — part 1 of 3 § 5 Part 1: ‘Calls for the EU and its Member States to review cooperation with and assistance for Uganda to ensure respect for EU principles, implement targeted sanctions,’ excluding the words ‘ensure respect for EU principles,’ Split vote requested by ECR, PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Paragraph 5 — part 2 12:12 RC-B10-0121/2026 – § 5/2 Part 2: ‘ensure respect for EU principles,’ Split vote requested by ECR, PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
4. Paragraph 5 — part 2 of 3 § 5 Part 2: ‘ensure respect for EU principles,’ Split vote requested by ECR, PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Paragraph 5 — part 3 of 3 § 5 Part 3: ‘implement targeted sanctions, and prioritise support for civil society, human rights and LGBTIQ+ defenders, and journalists;’ excluding the words ‘and LGBTQI+’ Split vote requested by ECR, PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Final vote — text as a whole 12:13 RC-B10-0121/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
7. Alternative motion B10-0121/2026 B10-0121/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
8. Alternative motion B10-0123/2026 B10-0123/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
9. Alternative motion B10-0124/2026 B10-0124/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
10. Alternative motion B10-0125/2026 B10-0125/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
11. Alternative motion B10-0132/2026 B10-0132/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
3

Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:13–12:16

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 524 Against 3 Abstained 41

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:16 · 92% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; ESN mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 15 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 amendments (2 adopted, 4 rejected) and 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 adopted). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, Renew, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 15 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 6 12:13 RC-B10-0110/2026 – § 1 – Am 6 Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
2. Separate vote: after paragraph 7 After § 7
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Amendment 2 12:15 RC-B10-0110/2026 – § 10 – Am 2 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
4. Amendment 4 12:15 RC-B10-0110/2026 – § 10 – Am 4 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
5. Amendment 3 12:16 RC-B10-0110/2026 – After § 10 – Am 3 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
6. Amendment 1 12:16 RC-B10-0110/2026 – After recital D – Am 1 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
7. Amendment 5 12:16 RC-B10-0110/2026 – After recital F – Am 5 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
8. Final vote — text as a whole 12:16 RC-B10-0110/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
9. Alternative motion B10-0110/2026 B10-0110/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
10. Alternative motion B10-0117/2026 B10-0117/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
11. Alternative motion B10-0119/2026 B10-0119/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
12. Alternative motion B10-0122/2026 B10-0122/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
13. Alternative motion B10-0128/2026 B10-0128/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
14. Alternative motion B10-0130/2026 B10-0130/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
15. Alternative motion B10-0133/2026 B10-0133/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
4

Targeted expulsions of foreign journalists and foreign Christians in Türkiye under national security pretexts

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:17–12:18

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 502 Against 2 Abstained 59

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:18 · 89% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ~
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; Verts/ALE mostly abstained; The Left split.

How the vote unfolded · 15 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 6 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted, 2 rejected, 1 lapsed). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by Renew, ESN · separate votes by Verts/ALE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 15 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: after paragraph 1 After § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Separate vote: after paragraph 7 After § 7
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Amendment 3 12:17 RC-B10-0120/2026 – Recital D – Am 3 Roll call requested by ESN
Rejected
5. Separate vote: recital D Recital D Separate vote requested by Verts/ALE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Separate vote: recital D Recital D Separate vote requested by Verts/ALE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
7. Separate vote: after recital F After recital F
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Final vote — text as a whole 12:18 RC-B10-0120/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
9. Alternative motion B10-0111/2026 B10-0111/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
10. Alternative motion B10-0118/2026 B10-0118/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
11. Alternative motion B10-0120/2026 B10-0120/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
12. Alternative motion B10-0127/2026 B10-0127/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
13. Alternative motion B10-0129/2026 B10-0129/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
14. Alternative motion B10-0131/2026 B10-0131/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
15. Alternative motion B10-0134/2026 B10-0134/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5

Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy

Committee report by João Oliveira · voted 12:19–12:25

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 385 Against 141 Abstained 53

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:25 · 66% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 27 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 10 amendments (6 adopted, 4 rejected) and 15 parts of the text voted on separately (8 adopted, 7 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, S&D, PPE, PfE, Members · split votes by Members (4) · separate votes by Members.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 27 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 1 12:19 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
2. Alternative motions for resolutions
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote: paragraph 2 12:19 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 2 Separate vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
4. Paragraph 4 — part 1 12:20 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 4/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘undocumented persons, migrants,’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
5. Paragraph 4 — part 2 12:20 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 4/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by The Left, S&D
Rejected
6. Separate vote: paragraph 16 12:20 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 16 Separate vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by The Left, S&D
Rejected
7. Separate vote: paragraph 17 12:20 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 17 Separate vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by The Left, S&D
Rejected
8. Paragraph 22 — part 1 12:21 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 22/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls for this plan to dedicate robust EU funding to the expansion and renovation of public and social housing stock;’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
9. Paragraph 22 — part 2 12:21 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 22/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by The Left, S&D
Adopted
10. Amendment 6 12:21 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 31 – Am 6 Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
11. Amendment 3 12:21 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 35 – Am 3 Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
12. Amendment 11 12:21 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 46 – Am 11 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
13. Amendment 8 12:22 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 47 – Am 8 Roll call requested by PPE, Members
Adopted
14. Amendment 4 12:22 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 48 – Am 4 Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
15. Amendment 7 12:22 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 50 – Am 7 Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
16. Amendment 5 12:22 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 55 – Am 5 Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
17. Amendment 9 12:22 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After § 63 – Am 9 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
18. Separate vote: paragraph 64 12:23 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 64 Separate vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
19. Separate vote: paragraph 65 12:23 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – § 65 Separate vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
20. Separate vote: paragraph 67 § 67
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
21. Recital D — part 1 12:23 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – Recital D/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘a more equitable distribution of wealth,’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
22. Recital D — part 2 12:23 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – Recital D/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by The Left, S&D
Rejected
23. Recital O — part 1 12:24 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – Recital O/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘undocumented persons, migrants,’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
24. Recital O — part 2 12:24 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – Recital O/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by The Left, S&D
Rejected
25. Separate vote: after recital W After recital W
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
26. Amendment 10 12:24 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – After recital AG – Am 10 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
27. Final vote — text as a whole 12:25 A10-0260/2025 – João Oliveira – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
6

Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights

Committee report by Johan Danielsson · voted 12:25–12:28

Adopted Adopted by a clear majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 332 Against 209 Abstained 33

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:28 · 58% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 15 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (3 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (4 adopted, 7 rejected).

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, S&D, Members · split votes by Members (4) · separate votes by Members.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 15 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: paragraph 3 12:25 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 3 Separate vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D, Verts/ALE
Rejected
2. Amendment 1 12:25 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – After § 3 – Am 1 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
3. Paragraph 4 — part 1 12:25 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 4/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and to consider introducing a well-defined regime for the joint and several liability of economic operators and subcontractors and for ensuring transparency regarding the subcontractors involved and the share of the contract that the contractor intends to subcontract’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
4. Paragraph 4 — part 2 12:26 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 4/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
5. Paragraph 8 — part 1 12:26 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 8/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to include relevant proposals favouring direct employment relationships in its upcoming quality jobs act;’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
6. Paragraph 8 — part 2 12:26 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 8/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
7. Paragraph 11 — part 1 12:26 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 11/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to propose a framework to limit subcontracting chains with a focus on addressing issues in high-risk sectors;’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D, Verts/ALE
Adopted
8. Paragraph 11 — part 2 12:26 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 11/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D, Verts/ALE
Rejected
9. Amendment 3 12:27 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – After § 11 – Am 3 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
10. Amendment 2 12:27 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – After § 14 – Am 2 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
11. Paragraph 19 — part 1 12:27 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 19/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Stresses the need for a minimum EU framework under which labour intermediaries operate in order to strengthen their accountability, transparency obligations and compliance with minimum requirements and quality standards, as stipulated by ILO Convention No 181 on Private Employment Agencies;’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
12. Paragraph 19 — part 2 12:27 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – § 19/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
13. Separate vote: recital N 12:28 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – Recital N Separate vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
14. Separate vote: recital O 12:28 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – Recital O Separate vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
15. Final vote — text as a whole 12:28 A10-0256/2025 – Johan Danielsson – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
7

Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women

Committee report by Lina Gálvez · voted 12:28–12:45

Adopted Adopted by a clear majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 340 Against 141 Abstained 68

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:45 · 62% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 77 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 9 amendments (9 rejected) and 67 parts of the text voted on separately (44 adopted, 23 rejected).

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, S&D, PfE · split votes by S&D (4), PPE (14), PfE (4) · separate votes by PPE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 77 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 3 12:28 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point a – Am 3
Rejected
2. Amendment 4 12:29 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, after point b – Am 4
Rejected
3. Separate vote: paragraph 1, point d § 1, point d Separate vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Separate vote: paragraph 1, after point d § 1, after point d
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Paragraph 1, point e — part 1 of 2 § 1, point e Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and explore the possibility of implementing specific specialised courts for gender-based violence’” Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Paragraph 1, point e — part 2 of 2 § 1, point e Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Paragraph 1, point f — part 1 of 2 § 1, point f Part 1: ‘take action to fully implement existing commitments on gender equality and women’s empowerment, ensuring the protection of women’s equal human rights and fundamental freedoms without discrimination, to advance their participation in public life;’ Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Paragraph 1, point f — part 2 of 2 § 1, point f Part 2: ‘encourage and take action to ensure substantive gender equality and institutional gender parity at all levels of decision-making;’ Split vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Amendment 5 12:30 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, after point f – Am 5
Rejected
10. Separate vote: paragraph 1, after point f § 1, after point f
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Paragraph 1, point g — part 1 12:31 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point g/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘call for enhanced international cross-border mechanisms to ensure that victims of violence – especially migrants, refugees and people in need of international protection – can access justice across different countries;’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
12. Paragraph 1, point g — part 2 12:31 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point g/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
13. Paragraph 1, point h — part 1 12:31 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point h/1 Part 1: ‘emphasise the need to recognise gender apartheid as a crime against humanity under the Rome Statute and advocate for its international recognition, in order to ensure access to justice, accountability and the possibility of prosecution by international courts; support the definition of the UN Working Group on Discrimination against Women and Girls of gender apartheid’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
14. Paragraph 1, point h — part 2 12:31 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point h/2 Part 2: ‘as acts within an institutionalised system of gender-based discrimination and domination;’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
15. Paragraph 1, point i — part 1 of 2 § 1, point i Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘strengthen and expand dedicated courts, divisions or specialised procedures for gender-based violence or designate specialised judges within regular courts;’” Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
16. Paragraph 1, point i — part 2 of 2 § 1, point i Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
17. Separate vote: paragraph 1, point j 12:32 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point j Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
18. Paragraph 1, point k — part 1 12:32 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point k/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘relevant’” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
19. Paragraph 1, point k — part 2 12:33 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point k/2 Part 2: “that word” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
20. Separate vote: paragraph 1, after point k § 1, after point k
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
21. Paragraph 1, point n — part 1 12:33 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point n/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘defined as 50:50 parity between women and men in all their diversity’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
22. Paragraph 1, point n — part 2 12:33 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point n/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
23. Amendment 6 12:34 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, after point o – Am 6 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
24. Separate vote: paragraph 1, point p 12:34 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point p Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
25. Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 12:34 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point q/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘feminist and’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
26. Paragraph 1, point q — part 2 12:34 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point q/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
27. Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 12:34 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point r/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
28. Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 12:35 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point r/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
29. Amendment 7 12:35 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point s – Am 7
Rejected
30. Paragraph 1, point s — part 1 12:35 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point s/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘relevant’” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
31. Paragraph 1, point s — part 2 12:35 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point s/2 Part 2: “that word” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
32. Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 12:36 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR, including safe and legal abortion’, ‘call for efforts to ensure broad and equitable access to SRHR globally, and reaffirm that access to safe and legal abortion is a fundamental component of women’s SRHR and essential to their bodily autonomy;’, ‘abortion’ and ‘particularly emergency contraception,’” Split vote requested by PPE, PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
33. Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 12:36 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/2 Part 2: “second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR, including safe and legal abortion’” Split vote requested by PPE, PfE · Roll call requested by PfE, Verts/ALE
Adopted
34. Paragraph 1, point u — part 3 12:36 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/3 Part 3: ‘call for efforts to ensure broad and equitable access to SRHR globally, and reaffirm that access to safe and legal abortion is a fundamental component of women’s SRHR and essential to their bodily autonomy;’ without the words: second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’ (second occurrence) and ‘and reaffirm that access to safe and legal abortion is a fundamental component of women’s SRHR and essential to their bodily autonomy;’ Split vote requested by PPE, PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
35. Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 12:36 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/4 Part 4: “second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’ (second occurrence)” Split vote requested by PPE, PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
36. Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 12:36 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/5 Part 5: ‘and reaffirm that access to safe and legal abortion is a fundamental component of women’s SRHR and essential to their bodily autonomy’ Split vote requested by PPE, PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
37. Paragraph 1, point u — part 6 12:36 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/6 Part 6: ‘abortion’ Split vote requested by PPE, PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
38. Paragraph 1, point u — part 7 12:37 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point u/7 Part 7: ‘particularly emergency contraception,’ Split vote requested by PPE, PfE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
39. Paragraph 1, point v — part 1 12:37 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point v/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
40. Paragraph 1, point v — part 2 12:37 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point v/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
41. Paragraph 1, point w — part 1 12:37 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point w/1 Part 1: ‘reiterate that rape remains one of the most widespread human rights violations globally;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE, S&D
Adopted
42. Paragraph 1, point w — part 2 12:38 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point w/2 Part 2: ‘stress the importance of adopting consent-based rape legislation as an essential element of a comprehensive approach to combating sexual violence against women and girls; advocate for a consent-based definition of rape as a universal standard worldwide, aimed at enhancing legal protections and ensuring that sexual violence is defined by the absence of consent, rather than solely by the use of violence, coercion or threat; promote the concept that the silence of, and absence of resistance by, the victims do not constitute consent; underline that neither prior consent nor an existing relationship imply ongoing or future consent for any sexual acts; call, in this regard, on all countries to introduce a consent-based definition of rape and to guarantee survivors access to justice;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
43. Paragraph 1, point x — part 1 12:38 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point x/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘may’” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
44. Paragraph 1, point x — part 2 12:38 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point x/2 Part 2: ‘can’ Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
45. Amendment 8 12:38 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point aa – Am 8 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
46. Paragraph 1, point aa — part 1 12:38 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point aa/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘reaffirm the right of women and girls subjected to acts of persecution owing to gender-based violence to seek asylum;’, ‘in migration and to implement gender-responsive policies, including the establishment of safe and legal routes, the strengthening of the protection of women’ and ‘call for the recognition of gender-based persecution and gender apartheid as grounds for seeking asylum;’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
47. Paragraph 1, point aa — part 2 12:39 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point aa/2 Part 2: ‘reaffirm the right of women and girls subjected to acts of persecution owing to gender-based violence to seek asylum;’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
48. Paragraph 1, point aa — part 3 12:39 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point aa/3 Part 3: ‘in migration and to implement gender-responsive policies, including the establishment of safe and legal routes, the strengthening of the protection of women’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
49. Paragraph 1, point aa — part 4 12:39 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point aa/4 Part 4: ‘call for the recognition of gender-based persecution and gender apartheid as grounds for seeking asylum;’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
50. Paragraph 1, point ab — part 1 12:39 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point ab/1 Part 1: ‘advocate for girls’ right to inclusive, equitable and quality education, as a key driver of empowerment and the achievement of gender equality, equipping them with the knowledge, skills, opportunities and capacities that are essential for their whole lives, enabling them to claim their rights, access justice, participate fully in public life, and combat gender-based violence;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE, S&D
Adopted
51. Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2 12:39 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point ab/2 Part 2: ‘point out the importance of promoting women’s empowerment through inclusive, equitable and quality education, training and life-long learning, which are of vital importance for fighting gender stereotypes, attitudes and prejudices in all their dimensions and combating persisting inequalities; recall the importance of preventing gender-based violence through adequate campaigns and other actions, including by increasing digital media literacy, as well as through relevant, targeted education on age-appropriate, comprehensive relationships and sexuality, in order to increase knowledge about bodily integrity; highlight the need for a deeper understanding of anti-rights and anti-gender movements, including disinformation on gender equality, the incel phenomenon and misogyny and, in particular, their online manifestation known as the manosphere; advocate for more active policies to counter these phenomena and their narratives;’ Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
52. Amendment 9 12:40 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – § 1, point ad – Am 9 Roll call requested by PfE, S&D
Rejected
53. Separate vote: after citation 4 After citation 4
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
54. Separate vote: citation 6 12:40 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Citation 6 Separate vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
55. Separate vote: recital B Recital B
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
56. Amendment 1 12:41 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital B – Am 1 Roll call requested by PfE, S&D
Rejected
57. Separate vote: after recital C After recital C
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
58. Separate vote: after recital D After recital D
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
59. Separate vote: recital E Recital E Split vote requested by PfE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
60. Recital E — part 2 12:42 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital E/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PfE · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
61. Amendment 2 12:42 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital F – Am 2
Rejected
62. Separate vote: recital G Recital G Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
63. Recital G — part 1 12:42 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital G/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘whereas achieving balanced gender representation in these decision-making bodies must be a priority;’ and ‘stating parity as 50:50 representation between women and men in all their diversity,’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
64. Recital G — part 2 12:42 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital G/2 Part 2: ‘whereas achieving balanced gender representation in these decision-making bodies must be a priority;’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
65. Recital G — part 3 12:43 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital G/3 Part 3: ‘stating parity as 50:50 representation between women and men in all their diversity,’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
66. Recital H — part 1 of 3 Recital H Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘mandatory’ and ‘all’” Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
67. Recital H — part 2 of 3 Recital H Part 2: ‘mandatory,’ Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
68. Recital H — part 3 of 3 Recital H Part 3: ‘all’ Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
69. Recital K — part 1 12:43 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital K/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘may’” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
70. Recital K — part 2 12:44 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital K/2 Part 2: “that word” Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by S&D
Rejected
71. Recital M — part 1 12:44 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital M/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and rights (SRHR), including the denial of safe and legal abortion services’, ‘including safe and legal abortion,’ and second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
72. Recital M — part 2 12:44 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital M/2 Part 2: ‘and rights (SRHR), including the denial of safe and legal abortion services’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
73. Recital M — part 3 12:44 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital M/3 Part 3: ‘including safe and legal abortion,’ Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
74. Recital M — part 4 12:44 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital M/4 Part 4: “second ‘R’ in ‘SRHR’” Split vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
75. Separate vote: recital N Recital N
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
76. Separate vote: recital P 12:45 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Recital P Separate vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by S&D
Adopted
77. Final vote — text as a whole 12:45 A10-0010/2026 – Lina Gálvez – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
8

World Cancer Day

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:46–12:48

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 427 Against 15 Abstained 93

Final vote — text as a whole · 80% of votes cast in favour · electronic vote (totals only), no individual positions

How the vote unfolded · 19 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 11 parts of the text voted on separately (10 adopted, 1 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, ECR, ESN · split votes by Verts/ALE (2), ECR (2), ESN · separate votes by PPE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 19 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: paragraph 3 § 3 Split vote requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Paragraph 3 — part 2 12:46 RC-B10-0112/2026 – § 3/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by ESN · Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
3. Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 2 § 13 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘products’, ‘harmful’ and ‘including PFAS’” Split vote requested by Verts/ALE, ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Paragraph 13 — part 2 12:46 RC-B10-0112/2026 – § 13/2 Part 2: ‘products’ Split vote requested by Verts/ALE, ECR
Adopted
5. Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 2 § 13 Part 2: ‘products’ Split vote requested by Verts/ALE, ECR
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Paragraph 13 — part 4 12:46 RC-B10-0112/2026 – § 13/4 Part 4: ‘including PFAS’ Split vote requested by Verts/ALE, ECR
Adopted
7. Recital C — part 1 of 2 Recital C Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘harmful’ and ‘including to PFAS’” Split vote requested by Verts/ALE, ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Recital C — part 2 of 2 Recital C Part 2: ‘harmful’ Split vote requested by Verts/ALE, ECR
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Recital C — part 3 12:47 RC-B10-0112/2026 – Recital C/3 Part 3: ‘including to PFAS’ Split vote requested by Verts/ALE, ECR · Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
10. Amendment 1 12:47 RC-B10-0112/2026 – Recital D – Am 1 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
11. Separate vote: recital D Recital D Separate vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
12. Separate vote: recital D 12:48 RC-B10-0112/2026 – Recital D Separate vote requested by PPE · Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
13. Final vote — text as a whole Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Alternative motion B10-0112/2026 B10-0112/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
15. Alternative motion B10-0113/2026 B10-0113/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
16. Alternative motion B10-0142/2026 B10-0142/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
17. Alternative motion B10-0126/2026 B10-0126/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
18. Alternative motion B10-0135/2026 B10-0135/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
19. Alternative motion B10-0141/2026 B10-0141/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
9

Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:49–12:56

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 363 Against 71 Abstained 81

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:56 · 70% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 52 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 18 amendments (18 rejected) and 25 parts of the text voted on separately (18 adopted, 4 rejected, 3 lapsed). 8 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, Renew, ECR, PfE, ESN · split votes by S&D, PfE, ESN (8).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 52 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 18 12:49 RC-B10-0114/2026 – § 3 – Am 18 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
2. Paragraph 4 — part 1 of 2 § 4 Part 1: ‘Calls on all regional actors, including Türkiye, to refrain from any military action or support for armed groups that risks undermining the ceasefire, civilian protection and the prospects for an inclusive settlement;’ Split vote requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Paragraph 4 — part 2 of 2 § 4 Part 2: ‘denounces the continued military intervention and aggression by Türkiye in north-east Syria, including deadly attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure in Kurdish majority cities and provinces along the border between the two countries; urges the Turkish Government to immediately stop its military involvement in north-east Syria and enable negotiations for a peaceful solution between the Syrian transitional government and the SDF; calls on the Commission, the EEAS and the Member States to address Türkiye’s involvement in Syria in bilateral exchanges with the Turkish Government; stresses that any security arrangements must comply with international law and respect Syria’s territorial integrity, and must not result in forced displacement or demographic engineering;’ Split vote requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Amendment 12 12:49 RC-B10-0114/2026 – § 5 – Am 12 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
5. Separate vote: after paragraph 5 After § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Amendment 13 12:49 RC-B10-0114/2026 – § 8 – Am 13 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
7. Separate vote: paragraph 8 § 8 Split vote requested by ESN · Roll call requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Paragraph 8 — part 1 12:50 RC-B10-0114/2026 – § 8/1 Part 1: ‘Stresses that the continued presence of EU nationals among Daesh detainees places a direct responsibility on the Member States’ Split vote requested by ESN · Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
9. Paragraph 8 — part 2 12:50 RC-B10-0114/2026 – § 8/2 Part 2: ‘and that failure to address this issue undermines both regional and European security;’ Split vote requested by ESN · Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
10. Amendment 8 12:50 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 8 – Am 8 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
11. Amendment 9 12:50 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 8 – Am 9 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
12. Amendment 14 12:51 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 8 – Am 14 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
13. Paragraph 9 — part 1 of 2 § 9 Part 1: ‘Takes note of the international conference of the Global Coalition against Daesh in Riyadh, bringing together relevant international and regional actors to address the security situation in north-east Syria;’ Split vote requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Paragraph 9 — part 2 of 2 § 9 Part 2: ‘regrets the US administration’s announcement that it will end Operation Inherent Resolve and withdraw US troops from Syria and Iraq; calls for the EU, the Member States and like-minded countries to step up their efforts to combat any resurgence of Daesh, which would threaten the security of Syria, the region and Europe; welcomes the Syrian Government’s renewed commitment to countering terrorism within the framework of the Global Coalition against Daesh and urges the authorities to seek close military and intelligence coordination and cooperation with international partners; urges the Member States to step up their intelligence gathering with regard to Daesh’s activities in Syria and the broader Levant and assist the Syrian authorities in their efforts to dismantle existing networks and prevent fighters from regrouping; calls for the EU and its Member States to take concrete action in order to secure the long-term management of Daesh detainees and camps;’ Split vote requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Separate vote: paragraph 10 § 10 Split vote requested by ESN
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
16. Separate vote: paragraph 10 § 10 Split vote requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
17. Separate vote: paragraph 10 § 10 Split vote requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
18. Separate vote: paragraph 10 § 10 Split vote requested by ESN
Lapsed
19. Amendment 3 12:51 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 10 – Am 3 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
20. Amendment 4 12:52 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 10 – Am 4 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
21. Amendment 5 12:52 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 10 – Am 5 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
22. Amendment 15 12:52 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 11 – Am 15 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
23. Amendment 25 12:52 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 12 – Am 25 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
24. Amendment 26 12:52 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 13 – Am 26 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
25. Paragraph 14 — part 1 of 2 § 14 Part 1: ‘Recalls the role of the EU as one of the largest donors of humanitarian aid to the Syrian population; welcomes the Commission’s financial support package of approximately EUR 620 million for 2026 and 2027 and calls for the EU and its Member States to sustain humanitarian assistance and early recovery support in north-east Syria, with a particular focus on civilian protection, the resilience of local communities and support for Syrian civil society, independent human rights organisations and local peace-building initiatives;’ Split vote requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
26. Paragraph 14 — part 2 of 2 § 14 Part 2: ‘stresses the importance of predictable, multi-year humanitarian funding for Syria in order to ensure the continuity of life-saving assistance and to enable early recovery activities; underlines the importance of applying a humanitarian-development-peace nexus approach in Syria; reaffirms that EU support and the suspension of sanctions are conditional and reversible;’ Split vote requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
27. Amendment 16 12:53 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 14 – Am 16 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
28. Amendment 23 12:53 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 14 – Am 23 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
29. Paragraph 15 — part 1 12:53 RC-B10-0114/2026 – § 15/1 Part 1: ‘Calls on the Commission to adopt a stand-alone strategy on Syria’ Split vote requested by ESN · Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
30. Separate vote: paragraph 15 § 15 Split vote requested by ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
31. Amendment 10 12:54 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 15 – Am 10 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
32. Amendment 11 12:54 RC-B10-0114/2026 – After § 15 – Am 11 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
33. Amendment 24 12:54 RC-B10-0114/2026 – § 16 – Am 24 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
34. Separate vote: recital A Recital A Split vote requested by PfE, ESN
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
35. Recital A — part 2 12:54 RC-B10-0114/2026 – Recital A/2 Part 2: ‘whereas while Iran and Russia have a reduced influence on the current situation, other actors, such as Israel and Türkiye, are still using Syria as an arena for their indirect rivalries;’ excluding the words ‘Israel and’ Split vote requested by PfE, ESN · Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
36. Recital A — part 3 12:54 RC-B10-0114/2026 – Recital A/3 Part 3: ‘Israel and’ Split vote requested by PfE, ESN · Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
37. Separate vote: after recital F After recital F
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
38. Separate vote: after recital H After recital H
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
39. Recital I — part 1 of 2 Recital I Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘militia alliance’” Split vote requested by S&D
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
40. Recital I — part 2 of 2 Recital I Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by S&D
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
41. Amendment 7 12:55 RC-B10-0114/2026 – Recital J – Am 7 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
42. Recital N — part 1 12:55 RC-B10-0114/2026 – Recital N/1 Part 1: ‘whereas any EU development, reconstruction or stabilisation assistance must remain strictly conditional on tangible and verifiable progress on civilian protection, respect for ceasefire arrangements,’ Split vote requested by ESN · Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
43. Recital N — part 2 12:55 RC-B10-0114/2026 – Recital N/2 Part 2: ‘human rights and the protection of all components of Syrian society;’ Split vote requested by ESN · Roll call requested by ESN
Adopted
44. Final vote — text as a whole 12:56 RC-B10-0114/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
45. Alternative motion B10-0114/2026 B10-0114/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
46. Alternative motion B10-0115/2026 B10-0115/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
47. Alternative motion B10-0116/2026 B10-0116/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
48. Alternative motion B10-0136/2026 B10-0136/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
49. Alternative motion B10-0137/2026 B10-0137/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
50. Alternative motion B10-0138/2026 B10-0138/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
51. Alternative motion B10-0139/2026 B10-0139/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
52. Alternative motion B10-0140/2026 B10-0140/2026
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
10

Accession of the Republic of Albania to the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters

Motion for a resolution

Adopted Adopted

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Final vote on the motion for a resolution — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

11

Accession of Montenegro to the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters

Motion for a resolution

Adopted Adopted

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Final vote on the motion for a resolution — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.