Skip to content
2 New EU laws ·decision 2 of 15 on Tuesday, 25 November 2025

Enhancing police cooperation in relation to the prevention, detection and investigation of migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings; enhancing Europol’s support to preventing and combating such crimes

Committee report by Jeroen Lenaers · · voted at 12:28

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 556 for · 74 against · 7 abstained (87 % in favour) Justice, rule of law & rightsCrime, police & judicial cooperation

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 556 Against 74 Abstained 7

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 12:28 · 87% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left and Verts/ALE.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its position on a proposed EU law to step up police cooperation against migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings and to strengthen Europol's support in fighting these crimes. The law would make Europol a central hub for criminal information and create a European Centre Against Migrant Smuggling inside the agency, with member states setting up dedicated national structures. Parliament also backed extra funding and 50 new posts for Europol, while asking the Commission to clarify how staff and money would be moved from other programmes.

How the vote unfolded · 7 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 parts of the text voted on separately (4 lapsed).

Roll call requested by ESN.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 7 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote on the provisional agreement 12:28 A10-0109/2025 – Jeroen Lenaers – Provisional agreement – Am 56
Adopted
2. Final vote Text as a whole
— no individual positions recorded
4. Separate vote on Article 6 Article 6 – § 1 – point a
5. Separate vote on Article 6 Article 6 – § 1 – after point h
7. Final vote Commission proposal

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 25 November 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0109 in procedure 2023/0438.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site