← 9 July 8 September →

Plenary sitting, Thursday, 10 July 2025

MEPs decided on 7 subjects between 13:03 and 13:18 — 6 adopted, 1 rejected. That took 88 ballots, 37 of them by roll call with every MEP’s position recorded.

7
subjects decided
6 / 1
adopted / rejected
88
ballots, incl. 26 amendments
37
roll calls (per-MEP record)
Tightest result of the day: Motion of censure on the Commission — Rejected 175–360
New here? How plenary voting works and how to read this page

A sitting is one day of voting in the Parliament’s plenary. Everything voted that day is listed here by subject — a report, resolution, agreement or objection the Parliament is deciding on. Subjects are sorted into sections by what kind of decision they are (new laws, international agreements, non-binding resolutions, …); each section explains what “adopted” means there.

Each subject can involve many ballots. MEPs first vote on amendments (proposed changes) and on parts of the text a group asked to vote on separately, then hold the decisive vote on the whole text — that is the result shown at the top of every subject. The strip of squares and circles under it shows all the ballots in the order they were taken; open the list to see each one.

Only roll-call votes record how each MEP voted — click one to see every individual position and the full breakdown by political group. The row of group badges (✓ mostly for, ✗ mostly against, – mostly abstained, ~ split) shows which groups backed a result. Votes by show of hands record only the outcome.

Every subject is based on a document (a committee report, a motion for a resolution, or a Council/Commission text) and belongs to a procedure — the full legislative file that can span years. The buttons on each subject take you to both.

Glossary: Am 27 = amendment 27 · § 5 = paragraph 5 · part 1/2 = a paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts (a split vote) · separate vote = a paragraph voted on its own, usually so a group can vote against it · = joins identical amendments voted together · 1st reading (***I) = Parliament’s first pass at a proposed law · Lapsed = fell away without a vote because an earlier vote settled the matter.

New EU laws

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

1

Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies

Committee report by Antonio Decaro · 1st reading · voted 13:10–13:11

📄 Report A-10-2025-0134 Full procedure 2025/0129
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 542 Against 97 Abstained 12

Final vote at 13:11 · 83% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left and Verts/ALE.

How the vote unfolded · 9 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 4 parts of the text voted on separately (4 rejected).

Roll call requested by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 9 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 1 13:10 A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro – Recital 2 – Am 1 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
2. Separate vote: recital 2 Recital 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Amendment 2 13:10 A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro – After recital 2 – Am 2 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
4. Amendment 3 13:10 A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro – After recital 2 – Am 3 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
5. Amendment 4 13:11 A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro – After recital 2 – Am 4 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
6. Separate vote: recital 4 Recital 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Separate vote: after recital 4 After recital 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Separate vote: recital 6 Recital 6
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Final vote 13:11 A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro – Commission proposal
Adopted

Resolutions & reports

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

2

Motion of censure on the Commission

Motion for a resolution · voted at 13:03

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0319 Full procedure 2025/2140
Rejected Rejected by a large majority

Parliament rejected the text.

For 175 Against 360 Abstained 18

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 13:03 · 32% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✗
  • Renew ✗
  • PPE ✗
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE.

3

Case of Ryan Cornelius in Dubai

Motion for a resolution · voted at 13:06

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0341 Full procedure 2025/2796
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 511 Against 50 Abstained 75

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 13:06 · 80% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by ESN; PfE mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 6 ballots

5 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll call requested by Renew.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 6 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote on the motion for a resolution 13:06 RC-B10-0328/2025 – Motion for a resolution Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
2. Alternative motion B10-0328/2025 B10-0328/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
3. Alternative motion B10-0333/2025 B10-0333/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
4. Alternative motion B10-0336/2025 B10-0336/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5. Alternative motion B10-0340/2025 B10-0340/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
6. Alternative motion B10-0341/2025 B10-0341/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
4

Arbitrary arrest and torture of Belgian-Portuguese researcher Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic

Motion for a resolution · voted at 13:06

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0334 Full procedure 2025/2797
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 617 Against 4 Abstained 18

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 13:06 · 97% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI –

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 6 ballots

5 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll call requested by Renew.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 6 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote on the motion for a resolution 13:06 RC-B10-0327/2025 – Motion for a resolution Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
2. Alternative motion B10-0323/2025 B10-0323/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
3. Alternative motion B10-0327/2025 B10-0327/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
4. Alternative motion B10-0334/2025 B10-0334/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5. Alternative motion B10-0339/2025 B10-0339/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
6. Alternative motion B10-0342/2025 B10-0342/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5

Urgent need to protect religious minorities in Syria following the recent terrorist attack on Mar Elias Church in Damascus

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:07–13:10

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0335 Full procedure 2025/2798
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 625 Against 7 Abstained 10

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:10 · 97% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 27 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 9 amendments (5 adopted, 4 rejected) and 9 parts of the text voted on separately (5 adopted, 2 rejected, 2 lapsed). 8 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, Renew, ECR, PfE · split votes by ECR (2).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 27 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: paragraph 1 § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Separate vote: paragraph 2 § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Amendment 11 13:07 RC-B10-0335/2025 – After § 3 – Am 11 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
5. Separate vote: paragraph 4 § 4 Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Separate vote: paragraph 4 § 4 Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Separate vote: paragraph 4 § 4 Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
8. Separate vote: paragraph 4 § 4 Split vote requested by ECR
Lapsed
9. Amendment 12 13:07 RC-B10-0335/2025 – After § 4 – Am 12 Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
10. Separate vote: paragraph 5 § 5
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Amendment 1 13:08 RC-B10-0335/2025 – After § 5 – Am 1 Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
12. Amendment 4 13:08 RC-B10-0335/2025 – After § 5 – Am 4 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
13. Amendment 2 — part 1 13:08 RC-B10-0335/2025 – § 7 – Am 2/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘warns against the serious international security risk that a sudden disengagement of the United States in the region would cause in this uncertain context;’” Split vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
14. Amendment 2 — part 2 13:08 RC-B10-0335/2025 – § 7 – Am 2/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
15. Amendment 8 13:09 RC-B10-0335/2025 – After recital A – Am 8 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
16. Amendment 9 13:09 RC-B10-0335/2025 – Recital B – Am 9 Roll call requested by PfE
Adopted
17. Amendment 10 13:09 RC-B10-0335/2025 – After recital D – Am 10 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
18. Separate vote: after recital D After recital D
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
19. Final vote — text as a whole 13:10 RC-B10-0335/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
20. Alternative motion B10-0325/2025 B10-0325/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
21. Alternative motion B10-0335/2025 B10-0335/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
22. Alternative motion B10-0338/2025 B10-0338/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
23. Alternative motion B10-0343/2025 B10-0343/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
24. Alternative motion B10-0344/2025 B10-0344/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
25. Alternative motion B10-0345/2025 B10-0345/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
26. Alternative motion B10-0346/2025 B10-0346/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
27. Alternative motion B10-0347/2025 B10-0347/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
6

Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness

Committee report by Hildegard Bentele · voted 13:13–13:15

📄 Report A-10-2025-0123 Full procedure 2025/2008
Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 494 Against 83 Abstained 71

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:15 · 76% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by The Left and ESN; PfE mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 22 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 5 amendments (5 rejected) and 16 parts of the text voted on separately (16 adopted).

Roll call requested by Members · split votes by Members (6) · separate votes by Members.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 22 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 3 13:13 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – § 1 – Am 3 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
2. Amendment 4 13:13 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – § 8 – Am 4 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
3. Paragraph 10 — part 1 of 2 § 10 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘to ensure that the relevant EU agencies are adequately resourced,’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Paragraph 10 — part 2 of 2 § 10 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Separate vote: paragraph 14 § 14 Separate vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Paragraph 18 — part 1 of 2 § 18 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘sustainable’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Paragraph 18 — part 2 of 2 § 18 Part 2: “that word” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Separate vote: paragraph 21 § 21 Separate vote requested by Members
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Paragraph 24 — part 1 of 2 § 24 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘considers that bio-based feedstocks, such as sustainably sourced biomass, recycled waste and CO2 captured from biogenic sources, could be used as alternative feedstocks for the manufacturing of various products, contributing to the EU’s emissions reduction, resource efficiency and strategic autonomy; in this context, recalls the commitment in the EU’s Competitiveness Compass to develop policies to reward early movers;’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Paragraph 24 — part 2 of 2 § 24 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Amendment 5 13:14 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – After § 26 – Am 5 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
12. Paragraph 32 — part 1 13:14 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – § 32/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘welcomes the latest revision of the Renewable Energy Directive and its provisions to simplify permitting procedures, and’” Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
13. Separate vote: paragraph 32 § 32 Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Separate vote: paragraph 34 § 34 Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Paragraph 34 — part 2 13:15 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – § 34/2 Part 2: ‘underlines that the sector is characterised by high levels of risk and that reducing the cost of investment failure in the EU is necessary for attracting large-scale capital investment; calls for dedicated support to ensure that biotechnology and biomanufacturing SMEs, start-ups and scale-ups can access sufficient funding and compete globally; stresses that cross-border investment barriers must be reduced to facilitate investment in biotechnology and biomanufacturing scale-ups;’ Split vote requested by Members · Roll call requested by Members
Adopted
16. Amendment 1 13:15 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – After citation 2 – Am 1 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
17. Separate vote: citation 7 Citation 7 Separate vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
18. Recital H — part 1 of 2 Recital H Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘or Member State’” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
19. Recital H — part 2 of 2 Recital H Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Separate vote: recital N Recital N Separate vote requested by Members
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
21. Amendment 2 13:15 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – After recital S – Am 2 Roll call requested by Members
Rejected
22. Final vote — text as a whole 13:15 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted
7

Tackling China’s critical raw materials export restrictions

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:16–13:18

📄 Motion B-10-2025-0331 Full procedure 2025/2800
Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 523 Against 75 Abstained 14

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:18 · 85% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by The Left and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 17 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 8 amendments (8 rejected) and 2 parts of the text voted on separately (2 adopted). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, PfE · split votes by The Left.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 17 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 2 13:16 RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – After § 1 – Am 2 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
2. Amendment 3 13:16 RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – After § 2 – Am 3 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
3. Amendment 4 13:16 RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – § 8 – Am 4 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
4. Amendment 5 13:16 RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – § 10 – Am 5 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
5. Amendment 6 13:17 RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – After § 12 – Am 6 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
6. Amendment 7 13:17 RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – § 13 – Am 7 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
7. Separate vote: paragraph 13 § 13 Split vote requested by The Left
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Paragraph 13 — part 2 13:17 RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – § 13/2 Part 2: ‘underlines the importance of free trade agreements and the Global Gateway initiative in enhancing access to CRMs;’ Split vote requested by The Left · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
9. Amendment 8 13:17 RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – After § 13 – Am 8 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
10. Amendment 1 13:17 RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – § 14 – Am 1 Roll call requested by PfE
Rejected
11. Final vote — text as a whole 13:18 RC-B10-0324/2025/REV1 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
12. Alternative motion B10-0324/2025 B10-0324/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
13. Alternative motion B10-0326/2025 B10-0326/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
14. Alternative motion B10-0329/2025 B10-0329/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
15. Alternative motion B10-0330/2025 B10-0330/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
16. Alternative motion B10-0331/2025 B10-0331/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
17. Alternative motion B10-0332/2025 B10-0332/2025
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed