Skip to content
6 Resolutions & reports ·decision 6 of 7 on Thursday, 10 July 2025

Future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector: leveraging research, boosting innovation and enhancing competitiveness

Committee report by Hildegard Bentele · voted 13:13–13:15

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by a large majority 494 for · 83 against · 71 abstained (76 % in favour) Economy & single marketCompetitiveness & industrySimplification & red tape

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 494 Against 83 Abstained 71

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:15 · 76% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by The Left and ESN; PfE mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted a resolution on the future of the EU biotechnology and biomanufacturing sector, focusing on research, innovation, and competitiveness. The text calls for reducing regulatory and financial obstacles, shortening authorisation procedures, and improving access to capital and feedstock. It also recommends creating a Chief Biotechnology Officer in the European Commission to improve coordination and support the sector.

How the vote unfolded · 22 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 5 amendments (5 rejected) and 16 parts of the text voted on separately (16 adopted).

Roll call requested by Members · split votes by Members (6) · separate votes by Members.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 22 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 3 to paragraph 1 13:13 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – § 1 – Am 3 requested by Members
Rejected
2. Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 13:13 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – § 8 – Am 4 requested by Members
Rejected
3. Paragraph 10 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘to ensure that the relevant EU agencies are adequately resourced,’” requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Paragraph 10 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Separate vote on paragraph 14 requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Paragraph 18 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘sustainable’” requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Paragraph 18 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “that word” requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Separate vote on paragraph 21 requested by Members
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Paragraph 24 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘considers that bio-based feedstocks, such as sustainably sourced biomass, recycled waste and CO2 captured from biogenic sources, could be used as alternative feedstocks for the manufacturing of various products, contributing to the EU’s emissions reduction, resource efficiency and strategic autonomy; in this context, recalls the commitment in the EU’s Competitiveness Compass to develop policies to reward early movers;’” requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Paragraph 24 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 26 13:14 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – After § 26 – Am 5 requested by Members
Rejected
12. Paragraph 32 — part 1 13:14 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – § 32/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘welcomes the latest revision of the Renewable Energy Directive and its provisions to simplify permitting procedures, and’” requested by Members requested by Members
Adopted
13. Separate vote on paragraph 32 requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Separate vote on paragraph 34 requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Paragraph 34 — part 2 13:15 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – § 34/2 Part 2: ‘underlines that the sector is characterised by high levels of risk and that reducing the cost of investment failure in the EU is necessary for attracting large-scale capital investment; calls for dedicated support to ensure that biotechnology and biomanufacturing SMEs, start-ups and scale-ups can access sufficient funding and compete globally; stresses that cross-border investment barriers must be reduced to facilitate investment in biotechnology and biomanufacturing scale-ups;’ requested by Members requested by Members
Adopted
16. Amendment 1, adding text after citation 2 13:15 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – After citation 2 – Am 1 requested by Members
Rejected
17. Separate vote on citation 7 requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
18. Recital H — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘or Member State’” requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
19. Recital H — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Separate vote on recital N requested by Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
21. Amendment 2, adding text after recital S 13:15 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – After recital S – Am 2 requested by Members
Rejected
22. Final vote — text as a whole 13:15 A10-0123/2025 – Hildegard Bentele – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 10 July 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0123 in procedure 2025/2008.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site