Skip to content
1 New EU laws ·decision 1 of 7 on Thursday, 10 July 2025

Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policies

Committee report by Antonio Decaro · · voted 13:10–13:11

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 542 for · 97 against · 12 abstained (83 % in favour) Climate & environmentHealthEconomy & single marketWaste & circular economySingle market rules

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 542 Against 97 Abstained 12

Final vote at 13:11 · 83% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left and Verts/ALE.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its position on a proposed law that would amend EU rules on battery due diligence policies for economic operators. The position takes over the Commission's proposal, meaning Parliament agrees with the proposed changes. Parliament asks the Commission to refer the matter back if it makes substantial changes, and will forward its position to the Council, Commission, and national parliaments.

How the vote unfolded · 9 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 4 parts of the text voted on separately (4 rejected).

Roll call requested by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 9 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 1 to recital 2 13:10 A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro – Recital 2 – Am 1 requested by PfE
Rejected
2. Separate vote on recital 2
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Amendment 2, adding text after recital 2 13:10 A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro – After recital 2 – Am 2 requested by PfE
Rejected
4. Amendment 3, adding text after recital 2 13:10 A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro – After recital 2 – Am 3 requested by PfE
Rejected
5. Amendment 4, adding text after recital 2 13:11 A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro – After recital 2 – Am 4 requested by PfE
Rejected
6. Separate vote on recital 4
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Vote on text inserted after recital 4
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Separate vote on recital 6
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Final vote 13:11 A10-0134/2025 – Antonio Decaro – Commission proposal
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 10 July 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0134 in procedure 2025/0129.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site