4 Resolutions & reports ·decision 4 of 7 on Wednesday, 18 June 2025

Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility

Committee report by Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan · voted 13:06–13:17

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by a large majority 421 for · 180 against · 55 abstained (64 % in favour) EU budget & funds Economy & single market

The vote ✦ In short Full text Procedure

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 421 Against 180 Abstained 55

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:17 · 64% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it

The Left ~
Verts/ALE ✓
S&D ✓
Renew ✓
PPE ✓
ECR ✗
PfE ✗
ESN ✗
NI ✗

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN; The Left split.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility, which provides EU funds to member states for investments and reforms. The report assesses the Facility's performance and impact, and proposes improvements for the rest of its implementation period. It also draws lessons for the future, ahead of discussions on the post-2027 EU budget.

How the vote unfolded · 87 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 24 amendments (24 rejected) and 62 parts of the text voted on separately (51 adopted, 11 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, PfE, ESN · split votes by PfE (10), ESN (8) · separate votes by PfE, ESN.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 87 ballots in voting order

1. Paragraph 1 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘of solidarity in the light of two unprecedented crises’” requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

2. Paragraph 1 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

3. Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 13:06 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 1 – Am 2 requested by ESN

Rejected

4. Paragraph 3 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the Commission finding that the RRF has led to a sustained increase in investments across the EU and’ and ‘given its synergies with other EU funds; is, however, concerned that the RRF expiration in 2026 poses a significant risk of a substantial decline in public investment in common European priorities;’” requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

5. Paragraph 3 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

6. Separate vote on paragraph 5 requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

7. Separate vote on paragraph 5 requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

8. Separate vote on paragraph 5 requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

9. Amendment 15 to paragraph 7 13:07 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 7 – Am 15 requested by PfE

Rejected

10. Separate vote on paragraph 7 requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

11. Paragraph 7 — part 2 13:07 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 7/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE requested by PfE

Adopted

12. Separate vote on paragraph 9 requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

13. Separate vote on paragraph 15 requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

14. Amendment 16 to paragraph 17 13:07 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 17 – Am 16 requested by ESN

Rejected

15. Paragraph 17 — part 1 of 3 Part 1: ‘Stresses that the RRF is the first major performance-based instrument at EU level which is exclusively based on financing not linked to costs (FNLC);’ requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

16. Paragraph 17 — part 2 of 3 Part 2: ‘recalls that Article 8 of the RRF Regulation stipulates that the RRF must be implemented by the Commission in direct management in accordance with the relevant rules adopted pursuant to Article 322 TFEU, in particular the Financial Regulation and the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation;’ requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

17. Paragraph 17 — part 3 of 3 Part 3: ‘regrets that the Council did not agree to insert specific rules in the Financial Regulation to address the risks of this delivery model, such as double funding; considers that the rules of the Financial Regulation should be fully applicable to future instruments based on FNLC, including as regards fines, penalties and sanctions;’ requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

18. Amendment 3 to paragraph 18 13:08 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 18 – Am 3 requested by ESN

Rejected

19. Separate vote on paragraph 18

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

20. Separate vote on paragraph 19 requested by ESN, PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

21. Paragraph 19 — part 2 13:08 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 19/2 Part 2: ‘including through sufficient proceeds from new own resources introduced after 2021 without any undue reduction in programme expenditure or investment instruments under the MFF; deplores the lack of progress made in this regard, which raises concerns regarding the viability of the repayment of the debt undertaken under NGEU,’ requested by ESN, PfE

Adopted

22. Paragraph 19 — part 3 13:08 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 19/3 Part 3: ‘and urges the Council to adopt new own resources without delay and as a matter of urgency;’ requested by ESN, PfE

Adopted

23. Paragraph 19 — part 4 13:08 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 19/4 Part 4: ‘urges the Commission, furthermore, to continue efforts to identify additional genuine new own resources beyond the IIA and linked to EU policies, in order to cover the high spending needs associated with the funding of new priorities and the repayment of NGEU debt;’ requested by ESN, PfE

Adopted

24. Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 19 13:09 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 19 – Am 4 requested by ESN

Rejected

25. Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 19 13:09 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 19 – Am 18 requested by ESN, PfE

Rejected

26. Amendment 19 to paragraph 20 13:09 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 20 – Am 19 requested by ESN, PfE

Rejected

27. Amendment 5 to paragraph 21 13:09 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 21 – Am 5 requested by ESN

Rejected

28. Separate vote on paragraph 22

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

29. Separate vote on paragraph 23

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

30. Amendment 22 to paragraph 24 13:10 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 24 – Am 22 requested by PfE

Rejected

31. Separate vote on paragraph 25 requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

32. Separate vote on paragraph 26 requested by ESN, PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

33. Separate vote on paragraph 27 requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

34. Paragraph 28 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘need for an acceleration of investments in transnational cooperation’” requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

35. Paragraph 28 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

36. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 30

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

37. Amendment 24 to paragraph 33 13:10 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 33 – Am 24 requested by PfE

Rejected

38. Separate vote on paragraph 33 requested by ESN, PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

39. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 33

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

40. Amendment 26 to paragraph 34 13:11 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 34 – Am 26 requested by PfE

Rejected

41. Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 35 13:11 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 35 – Am 27 requested by PfE

Rejected

42. Separate vote on paragraph 36

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

43. Separate vote on paragraph 37 requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

44. Paragraph 38 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: ‘Notes that some milestones and targets may be no longer achievable because of objective circumstances;’ requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

45. Paragraph 38 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: ‘stresses that any NRRP revisions should be made in accordance with the RRF Regulation, including the applicable deadlines, and should not entail backtracking on reforms, commitments or lower quality projects but should maintain the overall ambition and the efficiency of public spending;’ requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

46. Amendment 29 to paragraph 39 13:12 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 39 – Am 29 requested by PfE

Rejected

47. Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 41 13:12 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 41 – Am 1 requested by The Left

Rejected

48. Separate vote on paragraph 42 requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

49. Separate vote on paragraph 42 requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

50. Paragraph 43 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: ‘Calls for an evaluation of how this framework could enable targeted investments in EU defence supply chains, strategic stockpiles and defence innovation,’ requested by PfE requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

51. Paragraph 43 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: ‘ensuring alignment with broader European security objectives;’ requested by PfE requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

52. Amendment 31 to paragraph 44 13:12 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 44 – Am 31 requested by ESN

Rejected

53. Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 45 13:13 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 45 – Am 32 requested by ESN, PfE

Rejected

54. Separate vote on paragraph 46

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

55. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 47

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

56. Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 47 13:13 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 47 – Am 34 requested by ESN, PfE

Rejected

57. Separate vote on paragraph 52 13:13 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 52 requested by ESN

Adopted

58. Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 55 13:13 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 55 – Am 35 requested by ESN

Rejected

59. Amendment 36 to paragraph 59 13:14 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 59 – Am 36 requested by PfE

Rejected

60. Paragraph 60 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘civil society organisations, social partners’” requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

61. Paragraph 60 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

62. Paragraph 64 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: ‘Believes that the combination of reforms and investments has proved successful but that a clearer link is needed between the two;’ requested by PfE requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

63. Paragraph 64 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: ‘highlights the importance of aligning any funding with the objectives of the instrument and disbursing it in line with the progress made towards them; insists that the level of ambition of NRRPs should not be lowered but should be commensurate with the RRF timeline to ensure their successful implementation;’ requested by PfE requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

64. Separate vote on paragraph 65 requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

65. Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 66 13:14 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After § 66 – Am 37 requested by ESN, PfE

Rejected

66. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 67

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

67. Paragraph 70 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘social partners, civil society organisations’” requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

68. Paragraph 70 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

69. Separate vote on paragraph 81 13:15 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 81 requested by ESN

Adopted

70. Amendment 38 to paragraph 82 13:15 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – § 82 – Am 38 requested by ESN

Rejected

71. Separate vote on citation 6 requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

72. Amendment 9, adding text after recital A 13:15 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – After recital A – Am 9 requested by PfE

Rejected

73. Amendment 10 to recital E 13:15 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital E – Am 10 requested by ESN, PfE

Rejected

74. Separate vote on recital E requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

75. Recital E — part 2 13:15 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital E/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by ESN requested by ESN

Adopted

76. Separate vote on recital F

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

77. Separate vote on recital G requested by ESN, PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

78. Recital G — part 2 13:16 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital G/2 Part 2: ‘whereas the Council has yet to adopt the adjusted basket of new own resources proposed by the Commission, which raises concerns about the viability of the repayment of the debt undertaken under NGEU;’ requested by ESN, PfE requested by ESN

Adopted

79. Separate vote on recital H requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

80. Separate vote on recital I

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

81. Recital K — part 1 of 2 Part 1: ‘whereas by 31 December 2024, Member States had submitted 95 payment requests and the level of RRF disbursements including pre-financing stood at EUR 197.46 billion in grants (55 % of the total grants envelope) and EUR 108.68 billion in loans (37 % of the total loans envelope); whereas three Member States have already received their fifth payment, while one Member State has not received any RRF funding; whereas all Member States have revised their national recovery and resilience plans (NRRP) at least once; whereas 28 % of milestones and targets have been satisfactorily fulfilled and the Commission has made use of the possibility to partially suspend payments where some milestones and targets linked to a payment request were not found to be satisfactorily fulfilled;’ requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

82. Recital K — part 2 of 2 Part 2: ‘whereas delays in the execution of planned reforms and investments, particularly in social infrastructure and public services, could lead to the underutilisation of available resources, thereby reducing the expected impact on economic growth, employment and social cohesion;’ requested by ESN

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

83. Recital M — part 1 of 2 Part 1: ‘whereas robust audit and control systems are crucial to protect the financial interests of the EU throughout the life cycle of the RRF;’ requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

84. Recital M — part 2 of 2 Part 2: ‘whereas the milestones commonly known as “super milestones”, in particular related to the rule of law, had to be fulfilled prior to any RRF disbursements;’ requested by PfE

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

85. Vote on text inserted after recital L

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

86. Amendment 13 to recital P 13:17 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Recital P – Am 13 requested by PfE

Rejected

87. Final vote — text as a whole 13:17 A10-0098/2025 – Victor Negrescu, Siegfried Mureşan – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 18 June 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0098 in procedure 2024/2085.

New here? How plenary voting works

A sitting: One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots: Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how: Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure: Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges: How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

Am 27 — amendment 27
§ 5 — paragraph 5
§ 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
***I — ; *** — ; * —
Lapsed —
A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site