Skip to content
Resolution on a topical subject First reading

Rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly the case of Sonia Dahmani

A resolution tabled by political groups, usually on an urgent matter or in reaction to a statement by the Commission or Council. Not binding.

Where it stands: Parliament adopted the text on 27 November 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

  1. ✓ Tabled for plenary
  2. ✓ Plenary vote Adopted 27 November 2025
  3. ✓ Parliament’s position Final
How a file moves through Parliament

A file is referred to one lead committee (others may give an opinion). Its rapporteur writes a draft report, committee members table amendments, and the committee votes to adopt the report. The report is then tabled for all MEPs; political groups can table further amendments, which are voted on before the final vote in plenary. The adopted resolution is Parliament’s final position; it is not itself law.

The text, version by version

Adopted by Parliament · latest Adopted text TA10-0304/2025 27 November 2025 ✦ Parliament condemns the arbitrary detention and sentencing of lawyer Sonia Dahmani and demands her immediate release, along with all those detained for exercising freedom of expression.⇄ what changed Tabled for plenary Joint motion RC-B10-0518/2025 26 November 2025 ⇄ what changed Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0518/2025 24 November 2025 ✦ The resolution condemns Tunisia's crackdown on dissent and urges the release of Sonia Dahmani and all those detained for exercising freedom of expression.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0537/2025 24 November 2025 ✦ This resolution demands the immediate release of Sonia Dahmani and all those detained solely for exercising freedom of expression or association, and insists on protecting these rights as guaranteed by the Tunisian Constitution.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0532/2025 24 November 2025 ✦ This resolution condemns escalating repression in Tunisia, including arbitrary detentions and restrictions on freedoms, and demands the release of Sonia Dahmani and all political prisoners.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0538/2025 24 November 2025 ✦ This resolution concerns the rule of law and human rights in Tunisia, focusing on the case of journalist and lawyer Sonia Dahmani, and calls for her release.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0525/2025 24 November 2025 ✦ This resolution condemns Tunisia's repression of dissent and the detention of lawyer Sonia Dahmani, demanding her release and better conditions.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0522/2025 24 November 2025 ✦ This resolution addresses the rule of law and human rights situation in Tunisia, focusing on the detention of journalist and lawyer Sonia Dahmani. It calls for the release of arbitrarily detained individuals and for constructive engagement with Tunisia.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0520/2025 24 November 2025 ✦ This resolution condemns the politically motivated conviction and detention of Sonia Dahmani in Tunisia and calls for her immediate release, as well as for the release of all individuals imprisoned for exercising their human rights.← Tabled for plenary Motion for a resolution B10-0536/2025 24 November 2025 ✦ This resolution addresses the rule of law and human rights in Tunisia, focusing on the case of Sonia Dahmani. It calls on Tunisian authorities to ensure her medical care, legal counsel, and independent trials.

Latest Tabled for plenary → Adopted by Parliament: No change of substance: the two versions differ only in presentation — cover page, numbering or the parts a report carries that the adopted text does not. see the changes →

Newest version first. Open a version to read it in full. “What changed” shows the differences paragraph by paragraph; ✦ lines are AI-written from the texts themselves.

Timeline

  1. Plenary stage
  2. Adopted Adopted by a large majority
    For 464 Against 58 Abstained 75

    Final vote — text as a whole at 12:06 · 78% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

    How the vote unfolded · 12 ballots

    adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

    Show all 12 ballots in voting order
    1. Separate vote on paragraph 1 12:05 RC-B10-0518/2025 – § 1
    Adopted
    2. Separate vote on paragraph 2 12:05 RC-B10-0518/2025 – § 2
    Adopted
    3. Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 7 12:06 RC-B10-0518/2025 – After § 7 – Am 1
    Rejected
    4. Final vote — text as a whole 12:06 RC-B10-0518/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
    Adopted
    5. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0518/2025
    — no individual positions recorded
    6. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0520/2025
    — no individual positions recorded
    7. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0522/2025
    — no individual positions recorded
    8. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0525/2025
    — no individual positions recorded
    9. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0532/2025
    — no individual positions recorded
    10. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0536/2025
    — no individual positions recorded
    11. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0537/2025
    — no individual positions recorded
    12. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0538/2025
    — no individual positions recorded
  3. 26 November 2025 1 amendment tabled for the plenary vote

    Groups propose changes to the tabled text; each is voted on before the final vote.