Skip to content
4 New EU laws ·decision 4 of 8 on Thursday, 22 October 2026

Revised heat and fuel benchmark values for 2026-2030

Committee report by Adam Jarubas · · voted 13:18–13:20

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 474 for · 82 against · 28 abstained (81 % in favour) EnergyClimate & environmentEfficiency & buildings

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 474 Against 82 Abstained 28

Final vote at 13:20 · 81% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left and Verts/ALE.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The proposal is a regulation amending Directive 2003/87/EC on revised benchmark values for the heat and fuel benchmarks for the period from 2026 to 2030. Parliament adopted its position on the law at first reading, which means it has set out where it stands on the proposal. Parliament calls on the Commission to refer the matter to it again if the Commission replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal. Parliament instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

How the vote unfolded · 17 ballots

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 6 amendments (6 rejected) and 7 parts of the text voted on separately (2 adopted, 5 rejected). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 17 ballots in voting order
1. Proposal to reject the text 13:18 A10-0276/2026 – Adam Jarubas – Proposal for rejection – Am 6= 7=
Rejected
2. Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Amendment 13 to Article 1 13:18 A10-0276/2026 – Adam Jarubas – Article 1 – § 1 – point -1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – § 1 – sub§ 6 – Am 13 requested by S&D
Rejected
4. Separate vote on Article 1 Article 1 – § 1 – point -1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – § 1 – sub§ 6
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Separate vote on Article 1 Article 1 – § 1 – point 1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – § 2a – sub§ 1
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Separate vote on Article 1 Article 1 – § 1 – point 1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – § 2a – sub§ 1
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Separate vote on Article 1 Article 1 – § 1 – point 1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – § 2a – sub§ 2
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Separate vote on Article 1 Article 1 – § 1 – point 1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – § 2a – after sub§ 2
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Separate vote on Article 1 Article 1 – § 1 – point 1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – § 2a – after sub§ 2
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Amendment 18 to Article 1 13:19 A10-0276/2026 – Adam Jarubas – Article 1 – § 1 – point 1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – after § 2a – Am 18 requested by PfE
Rejected
11. Separate vote on Article 1 Article 1 – § 1 – point 1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – § 2b
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
12. Amendment 14 to Article 1 13:19 A10-0276/2026 – Adam Jarubas – Article 1 – § 1 – point 1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – after § 2b – Am 14 requested by S&D
Rejected
13. Amendment 15 to Article 1 13:19 A10-0276/2026 – Adam Jarubas – Article 1 – § 1 – point 1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – after § 2b – Am 15 requested by S&D
Rejected
14. Amendment 16 to Article 1 13:19 A10-0276/2026 – Adam Jarubas – Article 1 – § 1 – point 1; Directive 2003/87/EC – Article 10a – after § 2b – Am 16 requested by S&D
Rejected
15. Amendment 17, adding text after recital 2 13:20 A10-0276/2026 – Adam Jarubas – After recital 2 – Am 17 requested by PfE
Rejected
16. Final vote 13:20 A10-0276/2026 – Adam Jarubas – Commission proposal
Adopted
17. Referral back to committee Request for referral back to committee
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 22 October 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0276 in procedure 2026/0211.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site