The report concerns vocational education and training (VET) and how to boost skills in the Union during transitions, responding to the Commission's Union of Skills initiative and the Herning Declaration. Parliament adopted the text as its official position, setting out its vision for a stronger, more attractive and equally valued vocational education and training sector. The text calls on the Commission and member states to turn parity of esteem between vocational and academic pathways into concrete measures in policy design, learner guidance, mobility, recognition systems, investment in quality and public communication.
How the vote unfolded · 6 ballots
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 rejected) and 3 parts of the text voted on separately (1 adopted, 1 rejected, 1 lapsed).
Roll call requested by PfE · split votes by Members.
adoptedrejectedlapsedsquare = amendmentcircle = part of the textdecisive voteSolid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions
All 6 ballots in voting order
1.Amendment 1 to paragraph 2713:48A10-0259/2026 – Brigitte van den Berg – § 27 – Am 1A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
Rejected
2.Amendment 2 to paragraph 2913:48A10-0259/2026 – Brigitte van den Berg – § 29 – Am 2A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
Rejected
3.Paragraph 29 — part 1 of 3Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to establish an individual right to training for workers as proposed in the Draghi report on the future of European competitiveness, available during working time and at no cost to workers;’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Members
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
4.Paragraph 29 — part 2 of 3Part 2: ‘calls on the Commission to establish an individual right to training for workers as proposed in the Draghi report on the future of European competitiveness,’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Members
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
5.Paragraph 29 — part 3 of 3Part 3: ‘available during working time and at no cost to workers;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Members
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Not put to a vote, because an earlier vote already settled the matter.
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).
Codes in ballot labels
Am 27 — amendment 27
§ 5 — paragraph 5
§ 5/2, part 2 — a A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another., taken in parts
Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
***I — Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council.; *** — Parliament can approve or reject the text, for example an international agreement, but cannot amend it.; * — Parliament gives its opinion on a proposal. The Council decides, but must wait for Parliament’s opinion.
Lapsed — Not put to a vote, because an earlier vote already settled the matter.