Skip to content
8 Objections to Commission measures ·decision 8 of 10 on Wednesday, 21 October 2026

Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

Genetically modified soybean MON 87769

Motion for a resolution · voted at 13:50

Parliament can object to technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Against a delegated act an adopted objection is a veto; against most implementing measures (such as GMO authorisations) it is a call on the Commission to withdraw the measure, which is not legally binding.

Adopted by a large majority 442 for · 196 against · 9 abstained (68 % in favour) Jobs, social affairs & equalityEducation, youth & culture

What Parliament decided

Adopted Objection passed by a large majority

The objection passed. For an implementing measure it is not legally binding: the Commission is asked to withdraw the measure but can still adopt it.

For 442 Against 196 Abstained 9

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:50 · 68% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✗
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by PPE.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament voted on a motion for a resolution on a draft Commission decision to renew the authorisation for placing on the market products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified soybean MON 87769. Parliament adopted the resolution, meaning it states its position that the draft decision exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 and is not consistent with Union law. Parliament calls on the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing decision and not to renew the authorisation of the GM soybean. It also asks the Commission to require an updated assessment of nutritional and compositional changes, to take account of current risk-assessment methodologies, and to strengthen post-market monitoring.

How the vote unfolded · 3 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 parts of the text voted on separately (2 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 3 ballots in voting order
1. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Vote on text inserted after recital N
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Final vote — text as a whole 13:50 B10-0469/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) requested by The Left, Verts/ALE
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 21 October 2026. The vote was taken on Motion B-10-2026-0469 in procedure 2026/2880.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site