Skip to content
6 Budget & emergency funds ·decision 6 of 10 on Wednesday, 21 October 2026

Mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund: assistance to Malta, Italy, Portugal and Spain with regard to storms in 2026

Committee report by Lucia Yar · voted at 13:40

Budget decisions: the annual budget, amending budgets, solidarity and adjustment funds, and discharge (approving how a budget was spent).

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 651 for · 17 against · 3 abstained (97 % in favour) Economy & single marketEU budget & fundsEuro & monetary union

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

The budget decision was approved.

For 651 Against 17 Abstained 3

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:40 · 97% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The Commission proposed to mobilise the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF) to provide assistance to Malta and Italy for storm Harry in January 2026 and to Portugal and Spain for storms in January and February 2026. Parliament approved the budget decision, meaning the assistance can be released to the four member states. The rapporteur supports swift adoption of the Commission proposal and the rapid release of the financial assistance, and calls on the Commission to deliver the contribution with particular urgency.

How the vote unfolded · 7 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 rejected) and 4 parts of the text voted on separately (4 rejected).

Roll call requested by Verts/ALE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 7 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 2 13:40 A10-0274/2026 – Lucia Yar – After § 2 – Am 1 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
2. Separate vote on paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote on paragraph 5
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Amendment 2 to paragraph 5 13:40 A10-0274/2026 – Lucia Yar – § 5 – Am 2 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
5. Separate vote on paragraph 6
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Separate vote on paragraph 15
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Final vote — text as a whole 13:40 A10-0274/2026 – Lucia Yar – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 21 October 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0274 in procedure 2026/0284.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site