Skip to content
4 Budget & emergency funds ·decision 4 of 7 on Wednesday, 7 October 2026

Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2026/002 ES/Galicia automotive ancillary – Spain

Committee report by Sandra Gómez López · voted at 13:15

Budget decisions: the annual budget, amending budgets, solidarity and adjustment funds, and discharge (approving how a budget was spent).

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 608 for · 55 against · 7 abstained (91 % in favour) Climate & environmentTransport & tourismRoad & vehiclesEmissions & carbon pricing

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

The budget decision was approved.

For 608 Against 55 Abstained 7

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:15 · 91% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament approved the release of money from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers, following an application from Spain for workers made redundant in the automotive ancillary industry in Galicia. The decision means Spain is entitled to a financial contribution of EUR 2 725 100, which represents 85 % of the total cost of EUR 3 206 000, to support the reintegration in the labour market of 400 targeted beneficiaries. The money is to be transferred from the EGF reserve to the EGF budget line, and the Employment and Social Affairs Committee and the Committee on Regional Development are associated with the process.

How the vote unfolded · 4 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 rejected).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 4 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote on paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Separate vote on paragraph 4
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote on paragraph 12
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Final vote — text as a whole 13:15 A10-0242/2026 – Sandra Gómez López – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 7 October 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0242 in procedure 2026/0195.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site