Skip to content
5 New EU laws ·decision 5 of 9 on Tuesday, 6 October 2026

Simplification of certain requirements for spatial information infrastructure in the Union (INSPIRE) (Omnibus VIII on environmental legislation)

Committee report by Emma Wiesner · · voted at 13:42

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 515 for · 108 against · 35 abstained (78 % in favour) Economy & single marketEU budget & funds

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 515 Against 108 Abstained 35

Final vote at 13:42 · 78% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ~

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by PfE and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The proposal would amend the INSPIRE Directive, which set up a European Spatial Data Infrastructure for sharing environmental spatial information between public sector organisations and improving public access to spatial data across the Union. It would simplify the directive by removing redundant technical requirements for network services and data sharing and instead rely on the general data legislation. Parliament adopted its position on the law at first reading, which is the step it takes before it can agree with the Council for the law to be final. Parliament calls on the Commission to refer the matter to it again if the Commission replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal.

How the vote unfolded · 4 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Roll call requested by The Left.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 4 ballots in voting order
1. Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Amendment 24 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 6 13:42 A10-0233/2026 – Emma Wiesner – Article 1, § 1, after point 6 – Am 24 requested by The Left
Rejected
3. Final vote 13:42 A10-0233/2026 – Emma Wiesner – Commission proposal
Adopted
4. Referral back to committee Request for referral back
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 6 October 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0233 in procedure 2025/0393.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site