Skip to content
8 Resolutions & reports ·decision 8 of 10 on Thursday, 17 September 2026

Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:31–13:34

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 601 for · 4 against · 5 abstained (99 % in favour) Justice, rule of law & rightsHealthCrime, police & judicial cooperationTobacco, alcohol & drugs

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 601 Against 4 Abstained 5

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:34 · 99% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted a resolution on drug trafficking in Europe's waters, covering border protection and support for law enforcement officers. Parliament adopted the text as its official position, meaning it states Parliament's stance without creating law. The resolution condemns attacks and deaths linked to drug trafficking and calls for stronger maritime surveillance, intelligence-sharing and international cooperation along trafficking routes.

How the vote unfolded · 21 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 14 amendments (5 adopted, 9 rejected) and 6 parts of the text voted on separately (2 adopted, 4 rejected).

Roll calls requested by PPE, PfE · split votes by Verts/ALE, S&D (4).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 21 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1 13:31 B10-0390/2026 – After § 1 – Am 2/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘stresses that police and Guardia Civil officers on the front line against drug trafficking must have the necessary vessels, equipment, training, staff and legal protection to carry out their missions safely; calls on the Member States to reflect the high-risk nature of this work in the professional status and social protection of these officers;’” requested by S&D requested by PPE
Rejected
2. Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2 13:31 B10-0390/2026 – After § 1 – Am 2/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by S&D requested by PPE
Adopted
3. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 13:31 B10-0390/2026 – After § 1 – Am 6 requested by PfE
Rejected
5. Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1 13:31 B10-0390/2026 – After § 1 – Am 7 requested by PfE
Rejected
6. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1 13:32 B10-0390/2026 – § 2 – Am 14/1 Part 1: ‘recognises the high-risk nature of the duties performed by police officers, border and customs officials and other frontline law enforcement personnel involved in combating drug trafficking,’ requested by S&D requested by PPE
Adopted
8. Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2 13:32 B10-0390/2026 – § 2 – Am 14/2 Part 2: ‘and calls for these duties to be recognised and classified as high-risk occupations in the EU;’ requested by S&D requested by PPE
Adopted
9. Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1 13:32 B10-0390/2026 – After § 2 – Am 9/1 Part 1: ‘Deeply regrets the deaths of Guardia Civil officers David Pérez Carracedo and Miguel Ángel González Gómez, who were killed in the line of duty in Barbate, Cádiz, on 9 February 2024 when their patrol vessel was deliberately rammed by drug traffickers using a high-powered vessel; pays tribute to their courage, dedication and ultimate sacrifice in the service of Spain and the protection of its citizens;’ requested by S&D requested by PfE, PPE
Rejected
10. Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2 13:32 B10-0390/2026 – After § 2 – Am 9/2 Part 2: ‘regrets that law enforcement officers are forced to confront organised criminal groups while lacking the means, resources and legal protection necessary to defend their own lives and those of others;’ requested by S&D requested by PfE, PPE
Rejected
11. Paragraph 5 — part 1 13:32 B10-0390/2026 – § 5/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and neutralisation’” requested by Verts/ALE requested by PPE
Adopted
12. Paragraph 5 — part 2 13:33 B10-0390/2026 – § 5/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by Verts/ALE requested by PPE
Adopted
13. Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5 13:33 B10-0390/2026 – After § 5 – Am 10 requested by PfE
Rejected
14. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 19
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
15. Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 22 13:33 B10-0390/2026 – After § 22 – Am 12 requested by PfE
Rejected
16. Amendment 4, adding text after recital B 13:33 B10-0390/2026 – After recital B – Am 4 requested by PfE
Rejected
17. Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1 13:33 B10-0390/2026 – Recital C – Am 13/1 Part 1: ‘whereas the nature of these duties exposes police officers, border and customs officials and other frontline law enforcement personnel to particularly high levels of risk,’ requested by S&D requested by PPE
Adopted
18. Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2 13:34 B10-0390/2026 – Recital C – Am 13/2 Part 2: ‘underscoring the need to recognise and classify these activities as high-risk professions in the EU;’ requested by S&D requested by PPE
Adopted
19. Vote on text inserted after recital C
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
20. Amendment 5, adding text after recital H 13:34 B10-0390/2026 – After recital H – Am 5 requested by PfE
Rejected
21. Final vote — text as a whole 13:34 B10-0390/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) requested by PPE
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 17 September 2026. The vote was taken on Motion B-10-2026-0390 in procedure 2026/2797.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site