Parliament adopted its annual report on the application of the regulation on European political parties and foundations, assessing the first months of the new rules. The text highlights the strategic role of European political foundations and calls for a review of their funding provisions, which are deemed insufficient for their growing tasks. MEPs ask the Commission to consider a legislative proposal to revise the funding rules, ensuring adequate resources while maintaining transparency and accountability.
How the vote unfolded · 18 ballots
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 9 amendments (9 rejected) and 8 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted, 5 rejected).
Roll calls requested by The Left, PfE, ESN.
adoptedrejectedlapsedsquare = amendmentcircle = part of the textdecisive voteSolid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions
All 18 ballots in voting order
1.Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 413:40A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 4 – Am 10A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
Rejected
2.Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 413:40A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 4 – Am 11A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
Rejected
3.Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 513:41A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 5 – Am 1A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Rejected
4.Separate vote on paragraph 6
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
5.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 16
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
6.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 16
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
7.Amendment 14 to paragraph 2013:41A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 20 – Am 14A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
Rejected
8.Separate vote on paragraph 2013:41A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 20A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
Adopted
9.Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 2013:41A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 20 – Am 5A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Rejected
10.Vote on text inserted after paragraph 20
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
11.Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 2013:42A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After § 20 – Am 7A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Rejected
12.Separate vote on paragraph 2113:42A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 21A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
Adopted
13.Amendment 8 to paragraph 2213:42A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 22 – Am 8A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Rejected
14.Separate vote on paragraph 2213:42A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – § 22A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PfE
Adopted
15.Separate vote on recital A
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
16.Amendment 2 to recital A13:42A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – Recital A – Am 2A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Rejected
17.Amendment 3, adding text after recital A13:43A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – After recital A – Am 3A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ESN
Rejected
18.Final vote — text as a whole13:43A10-0145/2026 – Loránt Vincze, Charles Goerens – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).
Codes in ballot labels
Am 27 — amendment 27
§ 5 — paragraph 5
§ 5/2, part 2 — a A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another., taken in parts
Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
***I — Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council.; *** — Parliament can approve or reject the text, for example an international agreement, but cannot amend it.; * — Parliament gives its opinion on a proposal. The Council decides, but must wait for Parliament’s opinion.
Lapsed — Not put to a vote, because an earlier vote already settled the matter.