Skip to content
2 New EU laws ·decision 2 of 22 on Thursday, 26 March 2026

Combating corruption

Committee report by Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle · · voted at 11:11

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 581 for · 21 against · 42 abstained (90 % in favour) Justice, rule of law & rightsCorruption & integrityCrime, police & judicial cooperation

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 581 Against 21 Abstained 42

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 11:11 · 90% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN –
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; ESN mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its position on a proposed EU directive to combat corruption, replacing existing rules and updating criminal offences. The directive sets minimum standards for defining and sanctioning corruption, including bribery in public and private sectors, and adds new offences like concealment of corruption proceeds and misconduct in public office. Parliament also strengthens prevention measures, protects whistle-blowers and victims, and aligns rules with the UN Convention against corruption.

How the vote unfolded · 17 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 13 parts of the text voted on separately (13 lapsed).

Roll call requested by ECR · split votes by ECR (3).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 17 ballots in voting order
1. Proposal to vote on amendments 11:11 A9-0048/2024 – Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle – Proposal to vote on amendments
Rejected
2. Final vote on the provisional agreement 11:11 A9-0048/2024 – Raquel García Hermida-Van Der Walle – Provisional agreement – Am 221
Adopted
3. Final vote Text as a whole
— no individual positions recorded
5. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1 (corresponds to Article 20 in Amendment 221)
— no individual positions recorded
16. Separate vote on recital 26 (corresponds to recital 33 in Amendment 221)
— no individual positions recorded
17. Final vote Commission proposal

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 26 March 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-9-2024-0048 in procedure 2023/0135.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site