Skip to content
4 New EU laws ·decision 4 of 24 on Thursday, 13 November 2025

Exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process

Committee report by Kris Van Dijck · · voted 11:51–11:52

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 543 for · 72 against · 22 abstained (85 % in favour) Foreign affairsTrade & customsEconomy & single marketEnlargement & neighbourhoodTariffs & trade defenceCustoms

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 543 Against 72 Abstained 22

Final vote at 11:52 · 85% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and ESN; opposed by PfE.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The EU is updating its exceptional trade measures for countries linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process, which cover duty suspensions for certain fruits and vegetables and tariff quotas for wine. Parliament adopted its position on the law, endorsing the Commission's proposal to extend these measures until 2030 and to remove an obsolete reference to fisheries. The measures have supported EU-Western Balkans trade, which exceeded EUR 83 billion in 2024, and the extension maintains conditionality on democratic principles and human rights. Parliament asks the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends its proposal, and will forward its position to the Council, Commission, and national parliaments.

How the vote unfolded · 5 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected).

Roll call requested by Verts/ALE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 5 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 3 to Article 1 11:51 A10-0188/2025 – Kris Van Dijck – Article 1 – § 1 – before point 1 – Am 3 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
2. Amendment 2 to Article 1– paragraph 1 11:52 A10-0188/2025 – Kris Van Dijck – Article 1– § 1 – point 1– after point b – Am 2 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
3. Amendment 4 to Article 1 11:52 A10-0188/2025 – Kris Van Dijck – Article 1 – § 1 – after point 4 – Am 4 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
4. Amendment 1, adding text after recital 5 11:52 A10-0188/2025 – Kris Van Dijck – after recital 5 – Am 1 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
5. Final vote 11:52 A10-0188/2025 – Kris Van Dijck – Commission proposal
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 13 November 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0188 in procedure 2025/0108.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site