Skip to content
6 New EU laws ·decision 6 of 12 on Tuesday, 21 October 2025

Monitoring framework for resilient European forests

Committee report by Emma Wiesner, Eric Sargiacomo · · voted at 13:25

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a clear majority 370 for · 264 against · 9 abstained (58 % in favour) Climate & environmentAgriculture, food & fisheriesNature & biodiversity

What Parliament decided

Adopted Rejected outright by a clear majority

A proposal to reject the whole text was adopted, so no final vote was needed.

For 370 Against 264 Abstained 9

Proposal to reject the text at 13:25 · 58% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✗
  • Renew ✗
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D and Renew.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament voted on a proposed EU law to set up a monitoring framework for resilient European forests. It rejected the Commission's proposal and called on the Commission to withdraw it. Parliament will forward its position to the Council, the Commission and national parliaments.

How the vote unfolded · 11 ballots

MEPs also decided on 7 parts of the text voted on separately (7 lapsed).

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, PPE, PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 11 ballots in voting order
1. Proposal to reject the text 13:25 A10-0176/2025 – Emma Wiesner, Eric Sargiacomo – Proposal for rejection
Adopted
2. Final vote Text as a whole
— no individual positions recorded
4. Separate vote on Article 13
— no individual positions recorded
10. Final vote Commission proposal
11. Referral back to committee Request for referral back (Rule 60(2))
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 21 October 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0176 in procedure 2023/0413.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site