Skip to content
7 Budget & emergency funds ·decision 7 of 10 on Wednesday, 8 October 2025

Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund: application EGF/2025/002 DE/Goodyear 2 – Germany

Committee report by Olivier Chastel · voted 14:00–14:01

Budget decisions: the annual budget, amending budgets, solidarity and adjustment funds, and discharge (approving how a budget was spent).

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 577 for · 47 against · 15 abstained (90 % in favour) Jobs, social affairs & equalityEU budget & fundsEmployment & workers’ rights

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

The budget decision was approved.

For 577 Against 47 Abstained 15

Final vote — text as a whole at 14:01 · 90% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament approved mobilising €3,085,166 from the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for redundant workers (EGF) to support Germany after 1,171 job cuts at Goodyear Germany GmbH. The money covers personalised services like retraining, career advice, job-search help and start-up grants for 915 targeted workers made redundant in the rubber and plastics sector. Parliament agreed with the Commission that Germany meets the intervention conditions and called for thorough final evaluations of the measures.

How the vote unfolded · 6 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 rejected) and 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 rejected).

Roll call requested by ESN.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 6 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote on paragraph 7
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Amendment 1, adding text after recital E 14:00 A10-0168/2025 – Olivier Chastel – After recital E – Am 1 requested by ESN
Rejected
3. Separate vote on recital F
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Amendment 2, adding text after recital F 14:00 A10-0168/2025 – Olivier Chastel – After recital F – Am 2 requested by ESN
Rejected
5. Separate vote on recital K
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Final vote — text as a whole 14:01 A10-0168/2025 – Olivier Chastel – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 8 October 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0168 in procedure 2025/0245.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site