Skip to content

← Decision 8 Decision 10 →

9 Resolutions & reports ·decision 9 of 10 on Thursday, 11 September 2025

Situation in Colombia after the wave of recent terrorist attacks

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:41–13:43

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by a large majority 355 for · 173 against · 15 abstained (65 % in favour) Foreign affairsLatin America
The vote✦ In shortFull textProcedure

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 355 Against 173 Abstained 15

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:43 · 65% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✗
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ~

Backed by Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE and S&D.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted a resolution on the situation in Colombia after a wave of recent terrorist attacks, condemning the assassination of Senator Miguel Uribe Turbay and other violence. The text calls on Colombian authorities to investigate the attacks fully, including intellectual instigators and facilitators, to bring perpetrators to justice. It expresses condolences to victims' families and the people of Colombia, and notes with concern the rise of organised crime and terrorism.

How the vote unfolded · 22 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 10 parts of the text voted on separately (3 adopted, 7 rejected). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, PPE · split votes by The Left.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 22 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote on paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 4
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote on paragraph 6
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6 13:41 RC-B10-0366/2025 - Après le § 6 - Am 5 requested by The Left
Rejected
6. Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 13:41 RC-B10-0366/2025 - Après le § 6 - Am 6 requested by The Left
Rejected
7. Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 7 13:41 RC-B10-0366/2025 - Après le § 7 - Am 7 requested by The Left
Rejected
8. Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 7 13:42 RC-B10-0366/2025 - Après le § 7 - Am 8 requested by The Left
Rejected
9. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Separate vote on recital F
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
11. Separate vote on recital H
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
12. Vote on text inserted after recital K
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
13. Recital L — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘paradoxical’” requested by The Left
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Recital L — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “that word” requested by The Left
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Final vote — text as a whole 13:43 RC-B10-0366/2025 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) requested by PPE
Adopted
16. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0366/2025
— no individual positions recorded
17. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0368/2025
— no individual positions recorded
18. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0370/2025
— no individual positions recorded
19. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0375/2025
— no individual positions recorded
20. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0378/2025
— no individual positions recorded
21. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0380/2025
— no individual positions recorded
22. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0384/2025
— no individual positions recorded

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 11 September 2025. The vote was taken on Motion B-10-2025-0366 in procedure 2025/2855.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site