Skip to content
2 New EU laws ·decision 2 of 16 on Wednesday, 10 September 2025

Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review

Committee report by Dragoş Benea · · voted 14:18–14:19

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 440 for · 168 against · 52 abstained (67 % in favour) EU budget & fundsCohesion & regional funds

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 440 Against 168 Abstained 52

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 14:19 · 67% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The proposal amends EU cohesion policy rules to let member states redirect funds to new strategic priorities, such as defence and competitiveness, during the mid-term review. Parliament adopted its position on the law, backing the changes with amendments, including support for long-duration electricity storage and safeguards on rule-of-law conditionality. Parliament calls on the Commission to reassess the 15% reallocation threshold and to report on transfers, ensuring transparency and protecting cohesion objectives.

How the vote unfolded · 16 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 10 parts of the text voted on separately (10 lapsed).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 16 ballots in voting order
1. Amendments 79 + 81 (voted as one) 14:18 A10-0129/2025 - Dragoş Benea - Rejet - Am 79= 81= requested by The Left
Rejected
2. Proposal to vote on amendments 14:18 A10-0129/2025 - Dragoş Benea - Demande de procéder au vote sur les amendements
Rejected
3. Final vote on the provisional agreement 14:19 A10-0129/2025 - Dragoş Benea - Accord provisoire - Am 77
Adopted
4. Commission statement
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Final vote Text as a whole
6. Separate vote on Title
— no individual positions recorded
10. Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 1, point 1, point c; Regulation (EU) 2021/1058; Article 3, paragraph 1c, subparagraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
15. Vote on text inserted after recital 19
— no individual positions recorded
16. Final vote Commission proposal

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 10 September 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0129 in procedure 2025/0084.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site