Skip to content
1 New EU laws ·decision 1 of 16 on Wednesday, 10 September 2025

European Social Fund (ESF+): specific measures to address strategic challenges

Committee report by Marit Maij · · voted at 14:17

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 453 for · 149 against · 59 abstained (69 % in favour) EU budget & fundsJobs, social affairs & equalityCohesion & regional funds

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 453 Against 149 Abstained 59

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 14:17 · 69% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by The Left, PfE and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its position on a proposal to amend the European Social Fund+ regulation to address strategic challenges. The changes allow member states to redirect funds to new EU priorities, with incentives like higher pre-financing and co-financing rates. Parliament asks the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends the proposal.

How the vote unfolded · 9 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 lapsed).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 9 ballots in voting order
1. Rejection
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Proposal to vote on amendments
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Final vote on the provisional agreement 14:17 A10-0122/2025 - Marit Maij - Accord provisoire - Am 32
Adopted
4. Commission statement
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Final vote Text as a whole
— no individual positions recorded
6. Separate vote on Title
— no individual positions recorded
7. Vote on text inserted after Article 1
— no individual positions recorded
8. Vote on text inserted after recital 9
— no individual positions recorded
9. Final vote Commission proposal

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 10 September 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0122 in procedure 2025/0085.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site