Skip to content
6 Resolutions & reports ·decision 6 of 9 on Wednesday, 2 April 2025

Protocol on the Implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024-2029) (Resolution)

Committee report by Eric Sargiacomo · voted 13:29–13:30

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 605 for · 68 against · 10 abstained (89 % in favour) Agriculture, food & fisheriesForeign affairsTrade & customsFisheriesAfricaTrade agreements

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 605 Against 68 Abstained 10

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:30 · 89% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted a resolution on the EU-Guinea-Bissau fisheries agreement protocol for 2024-2029, which sets fishing opportunities for EU vessels and EU financial support for Guinea-Bissau's fisheries sector. The resolution is Parliament's official position, accompanying its consent to the protocol, and includes recommendations for the Commission to consider during implementation. It calls for sustainable development of Guinea-Bissau's fisheries, better monitoring of sectoral support, and full information to Parliament at each stage.

How the vote unfolded · 6 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 4 parts of the text voted on separately (4 rejected).

Roll call requested by Verts/ALE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 6 ballots in voting order
1. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 5
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Separate vote on paragraph 9
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 10 13:29 A10-0040/2025 – Eric Sargiacomo – After § 10 – Am 2 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
4. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 21
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 25
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Final vote — text as a whole 13:30 A10-0040/2025 – Eric Sargiacomo – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 2 April 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0040 in procedure 2024/0159M.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site