Skip to content
5 Resolutions & reports ·decision 5 of 8 on Wednesday, 12 March 2025

Continuing the unwavering EU support for Ukraine, after three years of Russia’s war of aggression

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:31–12:45

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by a large majority 442 for · 98 against · 126 abstained (66 % in favour) Foreign affairsDefence & securityUkraine & RussiaSanctions

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 442 Against 98 Abstained 126

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:45 · 66% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR –
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by The Left and ESN; ECR and PfE mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted a resolution reaffirming its condemnation of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and demanding an immediate, complete and unconditional withdrawal of Russian forces. The text urges the EU and member states to massively increase military support to Ukraine, lift restrictions on using Western weapons against targets on Russian territory, and enhance sanctions. It also expresses strong disapproval of recent US statements and actions under the Trump administration, which it says undermine Ukraine's security and endanger Europe.

How the vote unfolded · 80 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 30 amendments (1 adopted, 29 rejected) and 40 parts of the text voted on separately (39 adopted, 1 rejected). 8 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE, ESN · split votes by PPE (2), ECR (5), PfE (5) · separate votes by ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 80 ballots in voting order
1. Motion for adjournment of the vote - ECR Group (Rule 206(4))
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Amendment 14, adding text before paragraph 1 12:31 RC–B10–0156/2025 – Before § 1 – Am 14 requested by The Left
Rejected
3. Amendment 15, adding text before paragraph 1 12:31 RC–B10–0156/2025 – Before § 1 – Am 15 requested by The Left
Rejected
4. Amendment 16, adding text before paragraph 1 12:31 RC–B10–0156/2025 – Before § 1 – Am 16 requested by The Left
Rejected
5. Amendment 17, adding text before paragraph 1 12:31 RC–B10–0156/2025 – Before § 1 – Am 17 requested by The Left
Rejected
6. Amendment 18, adding text before paragraph 1 12:31 RC–B10–0156/2025 – Before § 1 – Am 18 requested by The Left
Rejected
7. Separate vote on paragraph 1 12:32 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 1 requested by ECR, PfE, The Left
Adopted
8. Separate vote on paragraph 2 12:32 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 2 requested by The Left
Adopted
9. Paragraph 3 — part 1 12:32 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 3/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and that in response this calls for bold, brave and comprehensive political, security and financial decisions by the EU’” requested by PfE requested by ECR, PfE, The Left
Adopted
10. Paragraph 3 — part 2 12:32 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 3/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE requested by ECR, The Left
Adopted
11. Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 3 12:33 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 3 – Am 3 requested by PfE
Rejected
12. Separate vote on paragraph 4 12:33 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 4 requested by The Left
Adopted
13. Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 4 12:33 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 4 – Am 1 requested by The Left
Rejected
14. Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4 12:33 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 4 – Am 2 requested by The Left
Rejected
15. Amendment 19 to paragraph 5 12:33 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 5 – Am 19 requested by The Left
Rejected
16. Paragraph 5 — part 1 12:34 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 5/1 Part 1: ‘Expresses deep concern over the apparent shift in the United States’ stance on Russia’s war of aggression, which has included openly blaming Ukraine for the ongoing war, suspending US military aid, and attempting to coerce Ukraine into relinquishing its legitimate right to self-defence and into making territorial concessions;’ requested by ECR requested by PfE
Adopted
17. Paragraph 5 — part 2 12:34 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 5/2 Part 2: ‘stresses that, in light of this change, the EU and its Member States are now Ukraine’s primary strategic allies and must maintain their role as the largest donor to Ukraine and significantly increase the much-needed assistance they provide to uphold Ukraine’s right to self-defence and step in, as far as possible, to replace suspended USAID funding, while ensuring long-term aid for reconstruction and recovery;’ without the words: ‘in light of this change’; ‘now’; ‘as the largest donor to Ukraine’ and ‘to replace suspended USAID funding,’ requested by ECR requested by PfE
Adopted
18. Paragraph 5 — part 3 12:34 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 5/3 Part 3: “The words ‘in light of this change’; ‘now’; ‘as the largest donor to Ukraine’ and ‘to replace suspended USAID funding,’” requested by ECR requested by PfE
Adopted
19. Paragraph 6 — part 1 of 5 Part 1: ‘Reiterates its call on the Member States, in the light of the regrettable decision of the US administration to cease all military assistance to Ukraine, along with intelligence sharing and access to satellite imagery, to substantially increase and accelerate their military support, in particular the provision of weapons and ammunition, as well as training, in response to pressing needs (inter alia long range weapons systems, air defence systems, artillery systems, electronic warfare systems, anti-drone capabilities and engineering equipment);’ without the words: ‘in the light of the regrettable decision of the US administration to cease all military assistance to Ukraine, along with intelligence sharing and access to satellite imagery,’ requested by ECR, PPE, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Paragraph 6 — part 2 of 5 Part 2: ‘in the light of the regrettable decision of the US administration to cease all military assistance to Ukraine, along with intelligence sharing and access to satellite imagery,’ requested by ECR, PPE, PfE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
21. Paragraph 6 — part 3 of 5 Part 3: ‘urges Member States and their defence industries to invest in and partner with the Ukrainian defence industry in order to maximise the full potential of its production capabilities to produce critical equipment in the most efficient manner following the Danish and Dutch examples;’ requested by ECR, PPE, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
22. Paragraph 6 — part 4 12:35 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 6/4 Part 4: ‘reiterates its position that all EU Member States and NATO allies should collectively and individually commit to supporting Ukraine militarily, with no less than 0.25 % of their GDP annually;’ requested by ECR, PPE, PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
23. Paragraph 6 — part 4 of 5 Part 4: ‘reiterates its position that all EU Member States and NATO allies should collectively and individually commit to supporting Ukraine militarily, with no less than 0.25 % of their GDP annually;’ requested by ECR, PPE, PfE requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
24. Paragraph 6 — part 5 of 5 Part 5: ‘calls on the EU and its Member States to utilise their satellite imagery infrastructure for Ukraine; recalls that the military support to Ukraine must be sufficient to ultimately stop Russia’s war of aggression and allow Ukraine to liberate all its people, re-establish full control over its entire territory within its internationally recognised borders and deter any further aggression by Russia;’ requested by ECR, PPE, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
25. Amendment 20, adding text after paragraph 7 12:35 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 7 – Am 20 requested by The Left
Rejected
26. Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 9 12:35 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 9 – Am 21 requested by The Left
Rejected
27. Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 9 12:36 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 9 – Am 22 requested by The Left
Rejected
28. Separate vote on paragraph 10 12:36 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 10 requested by ECR
Adopted
29. Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 11 12:36 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 11 – Am 5 requested by ECR
Rejected
30. Amendment 23 to paragraph 12 12:36 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 12 – Am 23 requested by The Left
Rejected
31. Separate vote on paragraph 12 12:37 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 12 requested by ECR, PfE
Adopted
32. Separate vote on paragraph 13 requested by ECR
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
33. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 13
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
34. Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 13 12:39 RC-B10-0156/2025 – After § 13 – Am 4 requested by PfE
Rejected
35. Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 13 12:39 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 13 – Am 10 requested by ESN
Rejected
36. Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 14 12:39 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 14 – Am 24 requested by The Left
Rejected
37. Separate vote on paragraph 15 12:40 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 15 requested by The Left
Adopted
38. Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 17 12:40 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 17 – Am 11 requested by ESN
Rejected
39. Paragraph 18 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: ‘Emphasises its full support for the ongoing investigation by the Prosecutor of the ICC into the situation in Ukraine based on alleged war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide; welcomes Ukraine’s ratification of the Rome Statute of the ICC, which allowed it to become a state party to it as of January 2025; in this context, expresses its utmost concern about the US sanctions against the ICC, its prosecutors, judges and staff, which constitute a serious attack on the international justice system; calls on the Commission to urgently activate the Blocking Statute’ without the words: ‘in this context, expresses its utmost concern about the US sanctions against the ICC, its prosecutors, judges and staff, which constitute a serious attack on the international justice system;’ requested by ECR, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
40. Paragraph 18 — part 2 12:40 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 18/2 Part 2: ‘in this context, expresses its utmost concern about the US sanctions against the ICC, its prosecutors, judges and staff, which constitute a serious attack on the international justice system;’ requested by ECR, PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
41. Paragraph 18 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: ‘in this context, expresses its utmost concern about the US sanctions against the ICC, its prosecutors, judges and staff, which constitute a serious attack on the international justice system;’ requested by ECR, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
42. Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 18 12:41 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 18 – Am 12 requested by ESN
Rejected
43. Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 18 12:41 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 18 – Am 13 requested by ESN
Rejected
44. Paragraph 19 — part 1 of 5 Part 1: ‘Welcomes the European Council’s decision to open accession negotiations with Ukraine once the Commission’s recommendations are met; Reaffirms that Ukraine’s future lies in the EU;’ requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
45. Paragraph 19 — part 2 of 5 Part 2: ‘welcomes progress on accession-related reforms despite wartime conditions;’ requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
46. Paragraph 19 — part 3 of 5 Part 3: ‘calls for the acceleration of accession talks, recognising Ukraine’s EU integration as a strategic priority;’ requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
47. Paragraph 19 — part 4 of 5 Part 4: ‘underscores the importance of continued EU financial assistance, linked to concrete reform, as a key instrument to sustain and accelerate Ukraine’s transformation in line with European standards; underlines that the Copenhagen criteria and the required reforms, in particular concerning the rule of law, democracy, fundamental freedoms and human rights, are fundamental to the merit-based process of accession;’ requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
48. Paragraph 19 — part 5 of 5 Part 5: ‘believes that Ukraine’s membership of the EU represents a geostrategic investment in a united and strong Europe and that it equates to showing leadership, resolve and vision;’ requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
49. Separate vote on paragraph 20 requested by ECR
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
50. Amendment 25 to paragraph 21 12:42 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 21 – Am 25 requested by The Left
Rejected
51. Amendment 26 to paragraph 23 12:42 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 23 – Am 26 requested by The Left
Rejected
52. Separate vote on paragraph 23 requested by ECR
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
53. Paragraph 23 — part 2 12:42 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 23/2 Part 2: “and therefore calls for the Russian sovereign assets immobilised under EU sanctions to be confiscated for the purpose of supporting Ukraine’s defence and reconstruction;” requested by ECR requested by ECR
Adopted
54. Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 23 12:42 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 23 – Am 27 requested by The Left
Rejected
55. Separate vote on paragraph 24 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
56. Paragraph 24 — part 2 12:43 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 24/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
57. Amendment 28 to paragraph 25 12:43 RC–B10–0156/2025 – § 25 – Am 28 requested by The Left
Adopted
58. Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 25 12:43 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 25 – Am 29 requested by The Left
Rejected
59. Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 25 12:43 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After § 25 – Am 30 requested by The Left
Rejected
60. Separate vote on paragraph 28 requested by ECR
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
61. Paragraph 33 — part 1 of 3 Part 1: ‘Calls on the EU and its Member States to strengthen EU strategic communication, particularly to publicly set the record straight about the EU’s leading support to Ukraine, especially in light of claims that seek to diminish its contribution, to counter hybrid threats and grey zone activities, and to prevent Russian interference in political, electoral, and other democratic processes in Ukraine and Europe; urges proactive communication on EU enlargement benefits to enhance public understanding and support for Ukraine’s accession in both Ukraine and the Member States; underlines that Ukraine’s EU integration is an opportunity for the development of both bordering regions and the Member States; calls strongly for the EU and the Member States to combat Russian disinformation about the war, by strengthening digital literacy, promoting fact-based narratives’ requested by ECR, PPE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
62. Paragraph 33 — part 2 of 3 Part 2: ‘and holding social media platforms accountable for spreading harmful content’ requested by ECR, PPE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
63. Paragraph 33 — part 3 of 3 Part 3: ‘by strictly enforcing the Digital Services Act;’ requested by ECR, PPE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
64. Separate vote on recital M requested by ECR
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
65. Separate vote on recital N requested by ECR
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
66. Separate vote on recital O requested by ECR
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
67. Separate vote on recital Q requested by ECR
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
68. Amendment 6, adding text after recital U 12:44 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After recital U – Am 6 requested by ESN
Rejected
69. Amendment 7, adding text after recital U 12:44 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After recital U – Am 7 requested by ESN
Rejected
70. Amendment 8, adding text after recital U 12:45 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After recital U – Am 8 requested by ESN
Rejected
71. Amendment 9, adding text after recital U 12:45 RC–B10–0156/2025 – After recital U – Am 9 requested by ESN
Rejected
72. Final vote — text as a whole 12:45 RC–B10–0156/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) requested by Renew, PPE, The Left
Adopted
73. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0156/2025
— no individual positions recorded
74. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0158/2025
— no individual positions recorded
75. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0159/2025
— no individual positions recorded
76. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0161/2025
— no individual positions recorded
77. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0163/2025
— no individual positions recorded
78. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0165/2025
— no individual positions recorded
79. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0166/2025
— no individual positions recorded
80. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0168/2025
— no individual positions recorded

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 12 March 2025. The vote was taken on Motion B-10-2025-0156 in procedure 2025/2528.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site