Skip to content

← 10 March 12 March →

Plenary sitting, Tuesday, 11 March 2025

8 decisions: 8 adopted. 24 ballots in all, 9 by , between 12:56 and 13:03.

Tightest result: European Social Fund Plus post-2027 — adopted 432 to 155.

✦ The day in brief · AI briefing

Parliament adopted positions on new EU laws and resolutions, covering Moldova's reform facility, the post-2027 social fund, research funding, and appointments to the bank resolution board.

New EU laws · 1

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

  1. Decision 1:Establishing the Reform and Growth Facility for the Republic of Moldova

    Committee report by Siegfried Mureşan, Sven Mikser ·

    The Facility aims to support Moldova's reforms for sustainable growth, EU accession, and socio-economic convergence.

    Adopted by a large majority 499 for · 117 against · 44 abstained

    Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by PfE and ESN.

Resolutions & reports · 6

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

  1. Decision 2:Verification of credentials

    Committee report by Ilhan Kyuchyuk

    Parliament verified the credentials of Members elected in the June 2024 European elections, declaring their mandates valid where national authorities had notified results and required declarations were made.

    Adopted by an overwhelming majority 643 for · 10 against · 15 abstained

    Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

  2. Decision 3:European Social Fund Plus post-2027

    Committee report by Marit Maij · 13 ballots, incl. 1 amendment

    The text sets out Parliament's position on how the fund should be shaped, including a call to double its budget.

    Adopted by a large majority 432 for · 155 against · 82 abstained

    Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

  3. Decision 4:Assessment of the implementation of Horizon Europe in view of its interim evaluation and recommendations for the 10th Research Framework Programme

    Committee report by Christian Ehler · 5 ballots, incl. 4 amendments

    The text calls for a simpler, science-driven programme with a budget of at least EUR 220 billion, and for putting researchers and innovators in the driving seat.

    Adopted by a large majority 472 for · 75 against · 92 abstained

    Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by The Left and ESN; PfE mostly abstained.

  4. Decision 5:Appointment of a member of the Single Resolution Board – Slavka Eley

    Committee report

    The Single Resolution Board is the EU body that ensures orderly resolution of failing banks.

    Adopted by an overwhelming majority 539 for · 43 against · 37 abstained

    Secret ballot, so how each group voted is not recorded.

  5. Decision 6:Appointment of a member of the Single Resolution Board – Radek Urban

    Committee report

    The decision follows a hearing and an evaluation of the candidate's credentials.

    Adopted by an overwhelming majority 562 for · 19 against · 67 abstained

    Secret ballot, so how each group voted is not recorded.

  6. Decision 7:Appointment of the Vice-Chair of the Single Resolution Board – Miguel Carcaño Saenz Cenzano

    Committee report

    The Single Resolution Board handles the resolution of failing banks under the EU's Single Resolution Mechanism.

    Adopted by an overwhelming majority 570 for · 46 against · 29 abstained

    Secret ballot, so how each group voted is not recorded.

Parliamentary immunity · 1

Requests from national authorities to lift an MEP’s immunity so legal proceedings can go ahead, or from an MEP to defend it.

  1. Decision 8:Request for the waiver of the immunity of Adam Bielan

    Committee report

    Adopted by show of hands, no counts recorded

✦ AI: one-sentence summaries written by an AI from the text voted on; the outcome and the numbers come from Parliament’s official record. Each decision’s page shows every ballot, the full text and the procedure.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

All the terms used on this site