22 Resolutions & reports ·decision 22 of 23 on Wednesday, 13 March 2024

Guidelines for the 2025 Budget – Section III

Committee report by Victor Negrescu · voted 17:32–17:43

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by a large majority 380 for · 102 against · 100 abstained (65 % in favour)

The vote ✦ In short Full text Procedure

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 380 Against 102 Abstained 100

Final vote — text as a whole at 17:43 · 65% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it

The Left ✓
Verts/ALE ✓
S&D ✓
Renew ✓
PPE ✓
ECR –
PfE ✗
ESN ✗
NI ✗

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 50 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 31 amendments (1 adopted, 30 rejected) and 18 parts of the text voted on separately (8 adopted, 10 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, ECR, MEPs, ID · split votes by PPE, ID (2) · separate votes by ID.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 50 ballots in voting order

1. Separate vote on subheading 1

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

2. Vote on text inserted before paragraph 1

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

3. Vote on text inserted before paragraph 1

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

4. Vote on text inserted before paragraph 1

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

5. Amendment 4, adding text before paragraph 1 17:32 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – Before § 1 – Am 4 requested by The Left

Rejected

6. Amendment 21 to paragraph 1 17:32 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – § 1 – Am 21 requested by The Left

Rejected

7. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

8. Amendment 22 to paragraph 4 17:32 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – § 4 – Am 22 requested by The Left

Rejected

9. Separate vote on paragraph 9 requested by ID

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

10. Paragraph 9 — part 2 17:33 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – § 9/2 Part 2: ‘urges, furthermore, the Commission to continue the efforts to identify fresh, new and preferably genuine own resources and other revenue sources for the EU budget beyond the IIA;’ requested by ID requested by ID

Adopted

11. Paragraph 10 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: ‘Regrets the fact that the capacity to respond to unforeseen events or to launch new initiatives is severely affected by budgetary scarcities and intends to rectify this situation to the extent possible and also taking account of the increased expectations by EU citizens;’ requested by ID

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

12. Paragraph 10 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: ‘recalls that it is necessary to establish an additional special instrument over and above the MFF ceilings so that the EU budget can better adapt and quickly react to crises and their social and economic effects;’ requested by ID

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

13. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 11

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

14. Amendment 23 to paragraph 12 17:33 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – § 12 – Am 23 requested by The Left

Rejected

15. Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 12 17:34 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 12 – Am 5 requested by The Left

Rejected

16. Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 12 17:34 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 12 – Am 6 requested by The Left

Rejected

17. Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 12 17:34 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 12 – Am 24 requested by The Left

Rejected

18. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 14

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

19. Amendment 25 to paragraph 18 17:34 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – § 18 – Am 25 requested by The Left

Rejected

20. Amendment 26 to paragraph 24 17:35 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – § 24 – Am 26 requested by The Left

Rejected

21. Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 24 17:35 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 24 – Am 7 requested by The Left

Rejected

22. Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24 17:35 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 24 – Am 31 requested by ID

Rejected

23. Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 26 17:36 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 26 – Am 8 requested by The Left

Rejected

24. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 26

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

25. Amendment 10, adding text before paragraph 27 17:36 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – Before § 27 – Am 10 requested by The Left

Rejected

26. Separate vote on paragraph 29 requested by ID

— no individual positions recorded

Adopted

27. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 29

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

28. Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 29 17:37 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 29 – Am 12 requested by The Left

Rejected

29. Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 31 17:37 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 31 – Am 13 requested by The Left

Rejected

30. Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 33 17:37 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 33 – Am 14 requested by The Left

Rejected

31. Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 33 17:37 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 33 – Am 15 requested by The Left

Rejected

32. Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 33 17:38 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 33 – Am 32 requested by ID

Rejected

33. Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 35 17:38 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 35 – Am 33 requested by ID

Rejected

34. Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 36 17:38 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 36 – Am 27 requested by ECR

Rejected

35. Separate vote on paragraph 40 17:39 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – § 40 requested by ID

Adopted

36. Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 40 17:39 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 40 – Am 34 requested by ID

Rejected

37. Amendment 35, adding text after paragraph 42 17:39 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 42 – Am 35 requested by ID

Rejected

38. Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 42 17:39 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 42 – Am 40 requested by MEPs

Adopted

39. Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 44 17:40 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 44 – Am 39 requested by MEPs

Rejected

40. Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 45 17:40 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 45 – Am 16 requested by The Left

Rejected

41. Amendment 41 to paragraph 46 17:40 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – § 46 – Am 41 requested by MEPs

Rejected

42. Paragraph 46 — part 1 17:41 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – § 46/1 Part 1: ‘Recalls its resolution adopted on 18 January 2024 acknowledging the role of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), which is providing shelter currently for over one million internally displaced persons and is the largest platform for providing humanitarian assistance to the population of the Gaza Strip, where the whole population faces deteriorating humanitarian conditions including shortages of shelter, clean water, food and medical assistance; reiterates, therefore, the importance of continued and predictable EU funding; welcomes the fact, that the UN launched an investigation without delay, following the serious allegations regarding individuals that were part of the UNRWA staff purportedly involved in the terrorist attacks against Israel of 7 October, and the information provided and prompt actions taken by the agency, notably to immediately terminate the existing contracts; notes the Commission’s call for an external audit reviewing thereby the pillar assessment of the UN control systems, agreed by UNRWA; supports the control, monitoring and scrutiny systems implemented by the Commission reminding that the use of EU funds by beneficiaries must respect EU rules and safeguards and international law;’ requested by PPE

Adopted

43. Paragraph 46 — part 2 17:41 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – § 46/2 Part 2: ‘welcomes, in this regards, that the Commission’s review of EU aid to Palestine concluded that the controls and existing and effective safeguards in place work well and that no evidence has been found to date that money has been diverted for unintended purposes, as well as the risk assessment and related additional measures;’ requested by PPE

Adopted

44. Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 46 17:41 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 46 – Am 36 requested by ID

Rejected

45. Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 46 17:42 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 46 – Am 17 requested by The Left

Rejected

46. Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 47 17:42 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 47 – Am 18 requested by The Left

Rejected

47. Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 47 17:42 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 47 – Am 19 requested by The Left

Rejected

48. Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 50 17:42 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – After § 50 – Am 38 requested by MEPs

Rejected

49. Separate vote on paragraph 53

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

50. Final vote — text as a whole 17:43 A9-0068/2024 – Victor Negrescu – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)

Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 13 March 2024. The vote was taken on Report A-9-2024-0068 in procedure 2023/2220.

New here? How plenary voting works

A sitting: One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots: Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how: Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure: Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges: How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

Am 27 — amendment 27
§ 5 — paragraph 5
§ 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
***I — ; *** — ; * —
Lapsed —
A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site