Final vote — text as a whole at 17:30 · 44% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →
Who backed it
The Left –
Verts/ALE ✓
S&D ✓
Renew ✓
PPE ✗
ECR ✗
PfE ✗
ESN ✗
NI –
Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D and Renew; opposed by PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; The Left mostly abstained.
How the vote unfolded · 41 ballots
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 15 amendments (3 adopted, 12 rejected) and 25 parts of the text voted on separately (23 adopted, 2 rejected).
Roll calls requested by The Left, S&D, PPE, ID · split votes by The Left, Renew (3), PPE (6), ID (4).
adoptedrejectedlapsedsquare = amendmentcircle = part of the textdecisive voteSolid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions
All 41 ballots in voting order
1.Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 117:21A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 1 – Am 7A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
2.Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 117:21A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 1 – Am 8/1Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘through applicable European and national legislative provisions; calls for the housing sector to be included as one of the Social Services of General Interest, and not only social housing, as this is essential to guarantee the right to affordable and decent housing for all; asks the Commission to revise the EU State aid rules to broaden the target group for affordable housing in order to guarantee an adequate supply of affordable housing for all, as well as the following measures: preventing any privatisation of public or social housing that would reduce the capacity of the state to ensure the right to adequate housing, and maintaining a regulatory framework for rented housing that safeguards security of tenure and ensures affordable housing for tenants, including through rent caps, controls or rent freezes where needed; highlights that the EU and Member States should ensure the provision of sufficient, adequate and affordable social housing to cover the housing needs of the three bottom quintiles of society and reduce by half the overburden of housing costs faced by these groups by 2030 and should establish a standard that at least 30 % of all new houses be affordable housing for the lower-income group, and at least 30 % affordable housing for the middle-income group calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce green social housing in their housing investment plans, including social housing sustainability criteria, as well as other aspects such as the provision of care facilities, access to recreational facilities, community centres, parks and green spaces especially in the most deprived areas, as a way to improve residents’ living conditions;’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Renew·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Adopted
3.Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 217:22A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 1 – Am 8/2Part 2: ‘through applicable European and national legislative provisions; calls for the housing sector to be included as one of the Social Services of General Interest, and not only social housing, as this is essential to guarantee the right to affordable and decent housing for all; asks the Commission to revise the EU State aid rules to broaden the target group for affordable housing in order to guarantee an adequate supply of affordable housing for all, as well as the following measures: preventing any privatisation of public or social housing that would reduce the capacity of the state to ensure the right to adequate housing, and maintaining a regulatory framework for rented housing that safeguards security of tenure and ensures affordable housing for tenants, including through rent caps, controls or rent freezes where needed;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Renew·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
4.Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 317:22A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 1 – Am 8/3Part 3: ‘to cover the housing needs of the three bottom quintiles of society and reduce by half the excessive housing costs faced by these groups by 2030 and should establish a standard that at least 30 % of all new houses be affordable housing for the lower-income group, and at least 30 % affordable housing for the middle-income group; calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce green social housing in their housing investment plans, including social housing sustainability criteria, as well as other aspects such as the provision of care facilities, access to recreational facilities, community centres, parks and green spaces especially in the most deprived areas, as a way to improve residents’ living conditions;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Renew·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
5.Paragraph 3 — part 1 of 2Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and third country nationals’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ID
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
6.Paragraph 3 — part 2 of 2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ID
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
7.Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 317:23A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 3 – Am 6A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ID
Rejected
8.Amendment 2 to paragraph 417:23A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – § 4 – Am 2A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Rejected
9.Separate vote on paragraph 5A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
10.Paragraph 5 — part 217:23A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – § 5/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PPE
Adopted
11.Paragraph 6 — part 1 of 2Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘underlines the need to strengthen and facilitate the recognition of skills and qualifications in the Union, including of non-EU nationals, who should be integrated into the labour market while further ensuring fair working conditions;’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ID
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
12.Paragraph 6 — part 2 of 2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ID
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
13.Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 7 — part 117:24A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 7 – Am 9/1Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Calls on the Commission to ensure quality jobs and fair working conditions through a revision of the Public Procurement Directive1a to further strengthen the social clause and to introduce social conditionalities and gender equality requirements for European funds and State aid to ensure quality jobs and collective bargaining; considers that this revision should help Member States meet the objective of an 80 % collective bargaining coverage rate as set out in the Adequate Minimum Wages Directive; furthermore’, ‘to present a directive on the anticipation and management of change in order to ensure just transitions, based on collective bargaining and social dialogue, and’ and ‘and an initiative to reduce working time for a better quality of working life’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Renew·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Adopted
14.Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 7 — part 217:24A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 7 – Am 9/2Part 2: ‘Calls on the Commission to ensure quality jobs and fair working conditions through a revision of the Public Procurement Directive1a to further strengthen the social clause and to introduce social conditionalities and gender equality requirements for European funds and State aid to ensure quality jobs and collective bargaining; considers that this revision should help Member States meet the objective of an 80 % collective bargaining coverage rate as set out in the Adequate Minimum Wages Directive; furthermore’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Renew·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
15.Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 7 — part 317:24A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 7 – Am 9/3Part 3: ‘to present a directive on the anticipation and management of change in order to ensure just transitions, based on collective bargaining and social dialogue, and’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Renew·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
16.Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 7 — part 417:25A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 7 – Am 9/4Part 4: ‘and an initiative to reduce working time for a better quality of working life’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Renew·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
17.Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 817:25A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 8 – Am 10A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
18.Paragraph 9 — part 117:25A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – § 9/1Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘while there is a need to reduce public debt within a reasonable time frame as required by Stability and Growth Pact,’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by The Left·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Adopted
19.Paragraph 9 — part 217:25A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – § 9/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by The Left·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Adopted
20.Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 9 — part 117:26A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 9 – Am 11/1Part 1: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘permanent’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Renew·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Adopted
21.Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 9 — part 217:26A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – After § 9 – Am 11/2Part 2: “that word”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by Renew·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by S&D
Rejected
22.Paragraph 10 — part 1 of 2Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the EPSR through their national recovery and resilience plans,’ and ‘migrants, ethnic minorities including Roma,’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ID
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
23.Paragraph 10 — part 2 of 2Part 2: ‘the EPSR through their national recovery and resilience plans,’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ID
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
24.Paragraph 10 — part 317:27A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – § 10/3Part 3: ‘migrants, ethnic minorities including Roma,’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by ID·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ID
Adopted
25.Paragraph 11 — part 117:27A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – § 11/1Part 1: ‘Calls for the mainstreaming of the EPSR in all relevant EU funds through the introduction of social conditionality in their allocation rules, as part of the Financial Regulation covering the EU general budget;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE, ID·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by ID
Adopted
26.Paragraph 11 — part 217:27A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – § 11/2Part 2: ‘calls on the Commission to explore a possible revision of the Public Procurement Directive to further strengthen the social clause and to align it with the Union’s upcoming rules on due diligence, while ensuring that benefiting companies and sub-contractors support collective bargaining and respect workers’ rights;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE, ID
Adopted
27.Separate vote on paragraph 11A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE, ID
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
28.Amendment 3 to paragraph 1217:28A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – § 12 – Am 3A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Rejected
29.Separate vote on paragraph 14A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
30.Paragraph 14 — part 217:28A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – § 14/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PPE
Adopted
31.Separate vote on paragraph 15A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
32.Paragraph 15 — part 217:28A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – § 15/2Part 2: ‘calls on the Commission to advance the EU social taxonomy;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PPE
Adopted
33.Separate vote on paragraph 16A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
34.Paragraph 16 — part 217:29A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – § 16/2Part 2: ‘and calls on the Member States to remove any national legislation that hampers collective bargaining;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PPE
Adopted
35.Vote on text inserted after recital C
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
36.Vote on text inserted after recital J
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Rejected
37.Recital K — part 117:29A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – Recital K/1Part 1: ‘whereas the inclusion of a social convergence framework in a revised and more democratic European Semester should foster upward social convergence and should improve the assessment and monitoring of employment and social developments in the Member States and the EU by identifying and addressing risks to upward convergence for Member States in the joint employment report based on the Social Scoreboard headline indicators and through the Commission’s publication of social convergence reports for those Member States identified as facing risks to upward social convergence;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PPE
Adopted
38.Separate vote on recital KA paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
39.Separate vote on recital M17:30A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – Recital MA vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
Adopted
40.Amendment 1 to recital R17:30A9-0050/2024 – Dragoş Pîslaru – Recital R – Am 1A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by The Left
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).
Codes in ballot labels
Am 27 — amendment 27
§ 5 — paragraph 5
§ 5/2, part 2 — a A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another., taken in parts
Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
***I — Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council.; *** — Parliament can approve or reject the text, for example an international agreement, but cannot amend it.; * — Parliament gives its opinion on a proposal. The Council decides, but must wait for Parliament’s opinion.
Lapsed — Not put to a vote, because an earlier vote already settled the matter.