With recommendations to the Commission on the 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies
JURI-PR-773199
Committee on Legal Affairs · Rapporteur: René Repasi
Written by a language model from the full text only; every figure comes from the text. The paragraph links open the paragraph a statement rests on — check the text itself before relying on it.
This draft report proposes a new EU legal framework, the '28th Regime', for innovative companies, to be called the 'European Start-Up and Scale-Up' (ESSU) company.¶¶¶ It recommends a directive based on Articles 50 and 114(1) TFEU, with maximum harmonisation, and rejects other legal bases.¶¶ The ESSU would be a national limited liability corporate form, automatically recognised across the EU, with simplified digital registration within 48 hours.¶¶¶ It includes safeguards for labour law and codetermination, optional long-termism schemes, employee stock ownership, equity-like debt instruments, and specialised dispute resolution.¶¶¶
Committee position. The rapporteur proposes a directive-based 28th regime for innovative companies, named ESSU, with maximum harmonisation and safeguards, and requests the Commission to act by early 2026.¶¶¶
Key points
- Requests the Commission to submit a proposal for a directive by the first quarter of 2026, based on Articles 50 and 114 TFEU.¶
- Opposes Article 352(1) TFEU, enhanced cooperation, and intergovernmental agreements as legal bases.¶
- Calls for maximum harmonisation to ensure uniform rules in all Member States.¶¶
- The ESSU should be a limited liability company, not listed, with registered seat in a Member State, and open to any company, not just 'innovative' ones.¶¶¶
- Registration must be digital, completed within 48 hours, and follow the 'once only' principle; a uniform EU digital register should be created.¶¶¶
- The ESSU must not undermine labour law or codetermination; codetermination law is determined by the real seat.¶¶¶
- Calls for optional steward ownership, asset locks, and dual-class shares to protect against 'killer acquisitions'.¶¶¶
- Calls for harmonised rules on employee stock ownership plans, with principles of transparency, non-discrimination, and voluntary participation.¶¶¶
- Calls for harmonised equity-like debt instruments that allow investment without control rights.¶¶
- Calls for model documents and expert groups to develop standardised articles and shareholder agreements.¶¶¶
- Calls for an alternative dispute resolution mechanism and special national court panels for ESSU disputes, with English possible.¶¶¶
Who is affected
- Small and medium enterprises, start-ups and scale-ups in the EU that may opt into the ESSU corporate form.¶¶¶
- Member States, which must incorporate the ESSU into national law and ensure automatic recognition.¶¶¶
- Investors, who may use new equity-like debt instruments and model agreements.¶¶¶
- Employees of ESSUs, who may participate in stock ownership plans and retain labour protections.¶¶¶
Figures and deadlines
Legal basis: Articles 50 and 114(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union¶¶¶