Bugetul general al Uniunii Europene pentru exercițiul financiar 2027 – toate secțiunile
ENVI-AD-789974
Comisia pentru mediu, climă și siguranță alimentară · Rapporteur: Pierfrancesco Maran
Written by a language model from the full text only; every figure comes from the text. The paragraph links open the paragraph a statement rests on — check the text itself before relying on it.
The Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food Safety asks the Committee on Budgets to include its points in the 2027 budget resolution. It wants the last budget of the 2021-2027 MFF to fund climate, environment, biodiversity, zero pollution and sustainable food goals.¶¶¶ It calls for money for climate action and adaptation, nature restoration, pollution reduction, circularity, water, soil and food safety, and for the EU budget to back the green transition and the phase-out of fossil fuels.¶¶ It says the 30% climate spending commitment must be met and tracked, regrets that biodiversity spending is below the 10% ambition for 2027, and asks for more money for the LIFE programme, especially its biodiversity strand.¶¶ It asks for a swift phase-out of substances of very high concern including PFAS, stronger water pollution prevention and water investment, and targeted just transition support through the Just Transition Fund and Social Climate Fund.¶¶¶ It wants a stronger Union Civil Protection Mechanism and rescEU, adequate staff for the European Environment Agency, European Chemicals Agency and European Food Safety Authority, swift pilot projects, and environmental and health impact assessment of budget spending.¶¶¶
Committee position. The committee asks the Committee on Budgets to incorporate its points into the 2027 budget resolution, prioritising climate, environment, biodiversity, water, pollution and food safety spending and calling for more resources for LIFE and the relevant EU agencies.¶¶¶
Key points
- The 2027 budget, the last of the 2021-2027 MFF, should prioritise climate, environment, biodiversity, zero pollution and sustainable food objectives while safeguarding competitiveness and innovation.¶
- Funding should support the just twin transition, economic growth, competitiveness, job creation and energy transition, taking account of national and regional differences.¶
- Resources should prioritise climate action, risk-preparedness and adaptation, nature restoration, biodiversity, pollution prevention, circularity, water, soil health and food safety.¶
- The budget must reflect the Union's international commitments and environmental law by supporting the green transition, renewable energy, energy efficiency and the phase-out of fossil fuels.¶
- The commitment to dedicate at least 30% of the MFF to climate action must be honoured and tracked; biodiversity spending remains below the 10% ambition for 2027 and should be redirected.¶
- The European Green Deal and the Clean Industrial Deal should guide budget consistency, including phasing out fossil fuel and other environmentally harmful subsidies under the 8th Environment Action Programme.¶
- The LIFE programme should get additional resources, especially for biodiversity, including cross-border projects in biologically valuable regions exposed to climate change and human pressure.¶
- The committee calls for a swift phase-out of substances of very high concern including PFAS, allowing use where no safe alternatives exist, and for waste prevention, reuse, repair, recycling and the polluter pays principle.¶
- It calls for stronger prevention of water pollution, investment in clean and affordable water, water efficiency and leakage reduction, and support for member states facing acute water scarcity.¶
- It calls for targeted support for the most affected regions, workers and households through the Just Transition Fund, the Social Climate Fund and climate-relevant cohesion investments.¶
- It stresses reinforcing the Union Civil Protection Mechanism and rescEU for floods, heatwaves, droughts and wildfires, and more investment in disaster prevention and early detection.¶
- It calls for adequate support and staff for the European Environment Agency, European Chemicals Agency and European Food Safety Authority, and for swift pilot projects and environmental and health impact assessment of budget spending.¶¶¶
Who is affected
- Member states: called on to redirect commitments towards biodiversity-relevant measures and given support for water efficiency and scarcity.¶¶
- The Commission: asked to track climate spending transparently and to redirect commitments towards biodiversity.
- The LIFE programme: should receive additional resources, particularly for its biodiversity strand.¶
- The European Environment Agency, European Chemicals Agency and European Food Safety Authority: should receive adequate support and human resources.¶
- Regions, workers and households most affected by the transition: targeted support through the Just Transition Fund and Social Climate Fund.¶