Sittings · Document

Report (2025/2164(INI)) 2026-01-14

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

15.1.2026 A10-0253/36

Amendment 36

Manon Aubry, Emma Fourreau, Anthony Smith, Marina Mesure, Per Clausen, Irene Montero, Isabel Serra Sánchez, Hanna Gedin, Jonas Sjöstedt, Danilo Della Valle, Rima Hassan, Arash Saeidi, Leila Chaibi, Damien Carême, Estrella Galán

on behalf of The Left Group

Report A10-0253/2025

David McAllister

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

(2025/2164(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 78 b (new)

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

78b. Calls on the Commission to immediately freeze the two regulations implementing the trade deal with the United States for as long as the US administration makes claims and threats in relation to Greenland; strongly encourages the Commission to put any further negotiations with the United States on hold;

Or. en

15.1.2026 A10-0253/37

Amendment 37

Manon Aubry, Emma Fourreau, Anthony Smith, Marina Mesure, Per Clausen, Irene Montero, Isabel Serra Sánchez, Danilo Della Valle, Rima Hassan, Arash Saeidi, Leila Chaibi, Damien Carême, Estrella Galán

on behalf of The Left Group

Report A10-0253/2025

David McAllister

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

(2025/2164(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 78 c (new)

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

78c. Underlines that the EU cannot accept extortive policies; stresses that threats made by the US administration against Greenland and Denmark, in addition to those made in relation to the EU’s digital legislation, fall under the definition of ‘economic coercion’ as set out in Regulation 2023/26751a; calls therefore for the Commission to immediately react by triggering the Anti-Coercion Instrument1b;

______________

1a Regulation (EU) 2023/2675 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 November 2023 on the protection of the Union and its Member States from economic coercion by third countries (OJ L, 2023/2675, 7.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2675/oj).

1b Regulation (EU) 2023/2675 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 November 2023 on the protection of the Union and its Member States from economic coercion by third countries (OJ L, 2023/2675, 7.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/2675/oj).

Or. en

15.1.2026 A10-0253/38

Amendment 38

on behalf of The Left Group

Report A10-0253/2025

David McAllister

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

(2025/2164(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 78 d (new)

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

78d. Strongly deplores and condemns any rhetoric, pressure or threats aimed at bringing Greenland under US control; calls for the EU, the VP/HR, the Commission and the Member States to react immediately, making clear that any attempt to undermine the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Denmark and Greenland would have serious political consequences and must be met with firm European solidarity;

Or. en

15.1.2026 A10-0253/39

Amendment 39

Manon Aubry, Emma Fourreau, Anthony Smith, Marina Mesure, Irene Montero, Isabel Serra Sánchez, Danilo Della Valle, Rima Hassan, Arash Saeidi, Leila Chaibi, Damien Carême, Estrella Galán

on behalf of The Left Group

Report A10-0253/2025

David McAllister

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

(2025/2164(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 78 e (new)

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

78e. Calls on the Council and the Commission, in line with Article 29 TEU and Article 215 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to adopt sanctions, without delay, against the United States in view of its serious violations of international law, including unlawful use of force and extraterritorial coercive measures undermining the sovereignty of third countries; stresses that the EU’s credibility requires the application of the same level of firmness whenever comparable legal thresholds are met, including in cases of territorial aggression against a sovereign nation;

Or. en

15.1.2026 A10-0253/40

Amendment 40

Lynn Boylan, Kathleen Funchion, Irene Montero, Isabel Serra Sánchez

on behalf of The Left Group

Report A10-0253/2025

David McAllister

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

(2025/2164(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 89

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

89. Acknowledges that the requirement for unanimity compels Member States to work relentlessly to achieve compromise and unity, which constitutes a key source of the EU’s political leverage on the global stage; points out, however, that the trade-off between the ideal of unity and the substantial costs of unanimity should be assessed carefully;

89. Acknowledges that the requirement for unanimity ensures that the Member States retain their sovereignty in respect of foreign policy issues; notes with concern that any proposals to move away from unanimity could undermine the neutrality of certain Member States;

Or. en

15.1.2026 A10-0253/41

Amendment 41

Lynn Boylan, Kathleen Funchion

on behalf of The Left Group

Report A10-0253/2025

David McAllister

Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025

(2025/2164(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 91

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

91. Reiterates its call for the Council to gradually transition to qualified majority voting for decisions in areas of the CFSP that do not have military or defence implications, specifically in the context of our sanctions regime; acknowledges the concerns of some Member States regarding a perceived reduction in their influence over foreign and security policy at EU level; recalls that the VP/HR is tasked, as set out in her mission letter, with triggering the use of Treaty provisions enabling qualified majority voting for the CFSP and, accordingly, expects the VP/HR to engage in constructive dialogue with the Member States to that end; encourages the full use of all possibilities that currently exist to enhance decisiveness in this regard and calls on the Member States to make greater and more transparent use of constructive abstention in line with Article 31(1) TEU in cases where they cannot endorse a decision but do not wish to block the Union’s collective action; stresses that this approach strengthens the EU’s ability to respond swiftly and coherently to international crises, while respecting national sovereignty, and demonstrates that greater effectiveness in the CFSP is already possible without a Treaty change; recognises that progress towards the application of qualified majority voting can only be gradual, building on the formation of a European strategic culture;

deleted

Or. en