Sittings · Document
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
11.6.2025 A10-0098/29
Amendment 29
Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet, Jana Nagyová, Filip Turek
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0098/2025
Victor Negrescu
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
(2024/2085(INI))
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
| 39. Is concerned about the Commission’s uneven assessment of NRRPs, which has led to double standards in the application of the Regulation; is further concerned about the uneven and different definition of milestones and targets from one NRRP to the other, as consistently reported by the ECA; | 39. Is concerned about the Commission’s uneven assessment of NRRPs, which has led to double standards in the application of the Regulation; is further concerned about the uneven and different definition of milestones and targets from one NRRP to the other, as consistently reported by the ECA; notes that these anomalies demonstrate unequal treatment and a lack of vision, and reinforce the perception of irresponsibility; |
Or. en
11.6.2025 A10-0098/30
Amendment 30
Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet, Nikola Bartůšek
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0098/2025
Victor Negrescu
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
(2024/2085(INI))
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
| 42. Calls for an 18-month extension of mature RRF projects through an amendment of the RRF Regulation by co-decision, if needed; emphasises that the envisaged extension of projects will be conducted by the Commission based on objective, clear and fair benchmarks; welcomes the possibility of establishing a targeted and performance-based prioritisation and transfer system after the 2026 deadline in order to allow for the finalisation of ongoing projects through other funding schemes, including the European Investment Fund and a possible new European competitiveness fund; urges the Commission to present a strategy to address the huge demand for public investment beyond 2026 without compromising budgetary resources in other critical areas; | 42. Calls for an 18-month extension of mature RRF projects through an amendment of the RRF Regulation by co-decision, if needed; emphasises that the envisaged extension of projects will be conducted by the Commission based on objective, clear and fair benchmarks; welcomes the possibility of establishing a targeted and performance-based prioritisation and transfer system after the 2026 deadline in order to allow for the finalisation of ongoing projects through other funding schemes, including the European Investment Fund and a possible new European competitiveness fund; urges the Commission to present a strategy to address the huge demand for public investment beyond 2026 without compromising budgetary resources in other critical areas; notes that it is a particularly serious situation for the EU to be so lacking in reactivity and efficiency compared to our competitors in the globalised economy; |
Or. en
11.6.2025 A10-0098/31
Amendment 31
Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet, Jana Nagyová, Filip Turek, Nikola Bartůšek
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0098/2025
Victor Negrescu
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
(2024/2085(INI))
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 44
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
| 44. Is concerned that some Member States might choose to forego parts of the amounts or entire amounts associated with their last payment request, thus avoiding the fulfilment of the last milestones and targets; | 44. Is concerned that some Member States might choose to forego parts of the amounts or entire amounts associated with their last payment request, thus avoiding the fulfilment of the last milestones and targets, once again demonstrating the evident weaknesses in the architecture of the RRF, whose shortcomings are particularly serious, given that it is a historic fund worth several hundred billion euro, financed through borrowing that will indebt us for over 30 years, and for which certain irresponsible bodies are now calling for the creation of own resources that would burden households and businesses in the Union, which this fund was initially intended to support; |
Or. en
11.6.2025 A10-0098/32
Amendment 32
Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0098/2025
Victor Negrescu
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
(2024/2085(INI))
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
| 45a. Deplores the lack of real-time monitoring and transparency for citizens regarding the use of RRF funds; considers that, for historic funds of such magnitude, which will lead to massive debts that will burden the Union’s budget for decades, this level of transparency should be an absolute minimum, and that merely listing the main final beneficiaries is completely insufficient to ensure transparency in the use of public money; |
Or. en
11.6.2025 A10-0098/33
Amendment 33
Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet, Jana Nagyová, Filip Turek
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0098/2025
Victor Negrescu
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
(2024/2085(INI))
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
| 46. Notes that the Commission relies on its own methodologies when calculating partial payments and suspensions of funds; regrets that these methodologies were only developed two years after the start of the RRF implementation and without the consultation of Parliament; | 46. Notes that the Commission relies on its own methodologies when calculating partial payments and suspensions of funds; regrets that these methodologies were only developed two years after the start of the RRF implementation, reinforcing the perception of serious improvisation for a fund of such magnitude; |
Or. en
11.6.2025 A10-0098/34
Amendment 34
Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet, Jana Nagyová, Nikola Bartůšek
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0098/2025
Victor Negrescu
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
(2024/2085(INI))
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
| 47a. Notes that the resources allocated to controlling the use of RRF funds are clearly insufficient and facilitate irregularities, which is an extremely serious situation for a fund of such magnitude; |
Or. en
11.6.2025 A10-0098/35
Amendment 35
Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet, Nikola Bartůšek
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0098/2025
Victor Negrescu
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
(2024/2085(INI))
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 55 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
| 55a. Stresses the numerous cases of irregularities and investments exposed to risks of non-compliance, including technically completed projects that may be tainted by illegal working conditions, conflicts of interest or artificial cost overruns, as well as cases of irregularities currently under investigation; |
Or. en
11.6.2025 A10-0098/36
Amendment 36
Enikő Győri, Paolo Borchia, Jorge Martín Frías
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0098/2025
Victor Negrescu
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
(2024/2085(INI))
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 59
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
| 59. Regrets the fact that Parliament has no role in the design of NRRPs and is not consulted on payment requests; criticises furthermore the fact that Parliament has not been provided with a clear and traceable overview of the implementation status of projects and payments; expects to be informed about the context of NRRP revisions in order to make its own assessment of the revisions and to have an enhanced role in possible future instruments based on the RRF experience; | 59. Recalls the fact that Parliament’s role is laid down in Articles 25 and 26 of the RRF Regulation; reiterates that, based on this regulation, Parliament has no role in the design of NRRPs and is not consulted on payment requests; emphasises, in this regard, that Parliament must always act within the remit of its competences; |
Or. en
11.6.2025 A10-0098/37
Amendment 37
Julien Sanchez, Angéline Furet, Jana Nagyová, Filip Turek
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0098/2025
Victor Negrescu
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
(2024/2085(INI))
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 66 a (new)
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
| 66a. Stresses that the RRF facility has set a worrying precedent in terms of budgetary implementation and transparency; considers that this exceptional mechanism, designed in a context of urgency, should under no circumstances serve as a model for the next MFF; |
Or. en
11.6.2025 A10-0098/38
Amendment 38
Julien Sanchez, Enikő Győri, Angéline Furet, Jana Nagyová, Paolo Borchia, Filip Turek, Jorge Martín Frías, Nikola Bartůšek
on behalf of the PfE Group
Report A10-0098/2025
Victor Negrescu
Implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
(2024/2085(INI))
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 82
| Motion for a resolution | Amendment |
| 82. Stresses that any possible future budgetary decisions on EU borrowing should respect the unity of the budget and Parliament’s role as part of the budgetary authority; highlights the risks of cost overruns for the repayment of debt, resulting inter alia from volatile interest rates; deems it important to ensure from the outset that sufficient funding is available to cover these costs without presenting a detriment to other programmes or political priorities; | 82. Stresses that the NGEU borrowing did not respect the unity of the budget and Parliament’s role as part of the budgetary authority; underlines, furthermore, that any possible future budgetary decisions on EU borrowing would put severe pressure not just on the EU budget but also on European taxpayers, and highlights the risks of cost overruns for the repayment of debt, resulting inter alia from volatile interest rates; deems it important to ensure from the outset that sufficient funding is available to cover these costs without presenting a detriment to other programmes or political priorities, which was manifestly not the case in this context and constitutes an extremely serious precedent, likely to have lasting negative consequences for the Union’s budget and for future generations; |
Or. en