Skip to content
2 New EU laws ·decision 2 of 8 on Thursday, 22 October 2026

Erasmus+ programme 2028-2034

Committee report by Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski · · voted 13:12–13:16

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 454 for · 34 against · 93 abstained (78 % in favour) Jobs, social affairs & equalityEU budget & fundsEducation, youth & culture

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 454 Against 34 Abstained 93

Final vote at 13:16 · 78% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN –
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; PfE and ESN mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The proposal would set up the Erasmus+ programme for the period 2028-2034 and repeal Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888. Parliament adopted its position on the law at first reading, which is the starting point for agreeing the final text with the Council. Parliament calls on the Commission to refer the matter to it again if the Commission replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal, and instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

How the vote unfolded · 35 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 8 amendments (2 adopted, 6 rejected) and 19 parts of the text voted on separately (6 adopted, 9 rejected, 4 lapsed). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Roll call requested by PfE · split votes by PfE (4) · separate votes by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 35 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote on block vote Amendments by the committee responsible – block vote
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Amendment 4 — part 2 13:12 A10-0257/2026 – Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 4/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
4. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Amendment 145 — part 2 13:12 A10-0257/2026 – Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 145/2 Part 2: ‘including measures aimed at aligning the status of participants in the Programme with that of other nationals in the same situation or at addressing difficulties in obtaining visas or residence permits.’ requested by PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
8. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
10. Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 1, point 12
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 1, point 12
— no individual positions recorded
12. Separate vote on Article 2, paragraph 1, point 12
— no individual positions recorded
13. Amendment 174 to Article 3, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1 13:13 A10-0257/2026 – Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski – Article 3, § 1, sub§ 1 – Am 174 requested by PfE
Rejected
14. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 2, point b
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
16. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 2, point b
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
17. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 3, after point b
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
18. Separate vote on Article 5, paragraph 1, after point a
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
19. Separate vote on Article 7, paragraph 1, point a
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
20. Amendment 175 to Article 8, paragraph 1 13:14 A10-0257/2026 – Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski – Article 8, § 1 – Am 175 requested by PfE
Rejected
21. Separate vote on Article 8, paragraph 6
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
22. Amendment 176, adding text after Article 8 13:14 A10-0257/2026 – Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski – After Article 8 – Am 176 requested by PfE
Rejected
23. Separate vote on Article 9, paragraph 4
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
24. Amendment 177 to Article 13, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1, point e 13:14 A10-0257/2026 – Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski – Article 13, § 2, sub§ 1, point e – Am 177 requested by PfE
Rejected
25. Amendment 178 to Article 14, paragraph 1 13:15 A10-0257/2026 – Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski – Article 14, § 1 – Am 178 requested by PfE
Rejected
26. Separate vote on Article 14, after paragraph 1
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
27. Separate vote on Article 14, paragraph 5
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
28. Separate vote on recital 16 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
29. Separate vote on recital 16 requested by PfE
30. Separate vote on recital 25 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
31. Separate vote on recital 25 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
32. Amendment 173 to recital 27 13:15 A10-0257/2026 – Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski – Recital 27 – Am 173 requested by PfE
Rejected
33. Vote on text inserted after recital 27
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
34. Final vote 13:16 A10-0257/2026 – Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski – Commission proposal
Adopted
35. Referral back to committee Request for referral back to committee
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 22 October 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0257 in procedure 2025/0222.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site